Technology won't fix itself. Thinking the opposite is being blinded by some religion-like belief (religion not intended as spirituality).
Be fucking better.
@finkd: "let's remind ourselves that our mission @Meta is to build the future of human connection [...] helping people to feel closer"
One second later (actually, 20 minutes later): AI chatbots
(a small thread)
This is terrifying
Meta launched AI chatbots that have the faces of celebrities, with different names, that you can talk to
This is NOT Charli D’Amelio
There are so many wrong things about this.
But most of all, directly or not, these kind of products leverage on a documented loneliness epidemic (https://t.co/mUW7l7xfSd) for their market positioning.
Is this the future we want? Is this the purpose of technology?
@MathisHammel Au delà du tweet en soi: en vrai il y a des (petits, jamais assez, ...) efforts qui sont faits, qui donnent de l'espoir.
Dans le cas du ICCV, entre autres, il y avait un panel dediés aux femmes dans la computer vision: https://t.co/zmm4KFKELF
@MirchaEmanuel@prevenzione Sta al garante adeguarsi al contesto tecnologico e non quest’ultimo ad un framework legale che tutela dei diritti degli utilizzatori? il GDPR non è perfetto, ma mettere in discussione l’adeguatezza implica che non si abbia fiducia nel suo ruolo primario: controbilanciare
@MirchaEmanuel@prevenzione Si ma non siamo più nel 2000. Il GDPR ci tutela, e deve essere visto come tale. Non come un freno… chi sviluppa dovrebbe prenderne atto in quanto requirement legale. Non si può fare quello che si vuole, soprattutto a questa scala (milioni di utenti).
Layers within layers
(Within layers within layers)
(Incepting a feature-rich Linux terminal within chatGPT that can then browse the web and incept a feature-rich Linux terminal within the incepted web’s chatGPT)
https://t.co/rOmy2nq5s9