Learner and leader curious about tech x edu, future of work, and education. Director of Technology and Co-Founder @Ed3dao | Founder of Peck Education LLC
So excited to begin exploring the new frontier of web3 and its pending impacts on education, the future of work, and technology. Join me via wordpress or https://t.co/duYiXzRHz0. https://t.co/qxiWwEg7RU
@packyM Appreciate this piece, Packy. Having a 3yr old and working in education, I think about this a lot. I'm very excited for the potential opportunities these new models are exploring.
Ben Horowitz says instead of banning AI, educators should set problems students can't solve without it:
"I was talking to Dan Boneh, who is a great professor of computer science and cryptography at Stanford. His take on AI was: You have two choices. You can ban it, and by the way, that won't work. Or you can make the problems so hard that you can't solve them without AI."
"What he's seeing is, 'I've got students solving things that no student in history could have ever solved.' That's what's possible. You want to have that orientation: What can you solve with the tools? What can you do that's a breakthrough? Now everybody has an opportunity to create a breakthrough."
"Then you're a main character, not an NPC. That's what the academy is about. Do you want to be a main character? If you want to be a main character, we help you do that. If you want to be a cog in a machine, this is not going to be the best place for you."
@bhorowitz
Anyone else find it real interesting that certain models tend to get lazy? My Hermes Agent really struggles with tool calling and executing multiple steps. Kinda funny how GLM 5.2 is like "yeah Mimo is hallucinating again"
This has been obvious to anyone who studies history and previous technological revolutions.
We abstract lower level problems away and move up the stack to new problems. That creates new complexity and a wider variety of jobs.
Complexity breeds more complexity.
The work is infinite because the problems are infinite. No machine, human, or man and machine hybrid can solve them all.
AI is not magic and we need to stop thinking about it that way.
The stack of problems is infinite and never ending.
@SOutremont@Austen Sure you can make that case. Especially when played in slow motion which is what FIFAs statement suggested was the driver. I guess the rhetorical question becomes why was one no card at all and one a red?
One thing I've been doing is having my Hermes agent make a workflow chart every 30 days to track changes in use case and enhancements. Would be great to see other and how they use theres. I think I really need to create subagents...
@vintrotweets@HermesAgentTips Yeah it was a skill I created for Hermes where a prompt would be in parallel run through 3 different models. Return results for all 3. Basically MOA sans orchestrator.
@vintrotweets@HermesAgentTips Only twice so far. I’ve built a couple diffeeent versions of panels, but didn’t think to include an orchestrator and so MOA seems to be a significant improvement on that idea. I’m guessing there’s a lot more performance that can be extracted from the design.