Edna Alexandra

[Edna Alexandra @Ednaiordache]

@SheynDim @angeliki_pap @JEO_journal Not always at least it did not happen to me. But yes, some journals send it to more reviewers. @JEO_journal #AskJEO

[Edna Alexandra @Ednaiordache]

@ACarrozzoMD @JEO_journal 2/2: i think the difference is in the details. Besides checking myself as a reviewer the instruction to authors, i add my own critical perspective. It takes some time but you get used to it and it becomes natural and easy. @JEO_journal #AskJEO

[Edna Alexandra @Ednaiordache]

@ACarrozzoMD @JEO_journal 1/2: There is a general checklist and it’s available on the official websites of both KSSTA and JEO. However i pay attention to many more details, like language, grammar, phrasing, order in the narrative and so on. @JEO_journal #AskJEO

[Edna Alexandra @Ednaiordache]

@anatheomia @JEO_journal @LMacchiarola Hi @anatheomia ! Good question. As a good reviewer you should have some basic statistical knowledge. However the main purpose of a reviewer is to check the ethical aspect, the logics behind the methods and the clinical relevance! @JEO_journal #AskJEO

[Edna Alexandra @Ednaiordache]

@angeliki_pap @JEO_journal It happens! But its only the editor who has the last word, so its up to him at the end of the process. All you can do is to do your best in judging and revising the manuscript. @JEO_journal #AskJEO

[Edna Alexandra @Ednaiordache]

@ec892894_sc3439 @JEO_journal @ec892894_sc3439 being always up to date with your field, improving your own clinical practice and knowledge, networking, getting better at writing your OWN manuscript…Dos and donts …LOTS of benefits
@JEO_journal #AskJEO