@Ukandi_one@_y3maya If you can't stick to an agreement, you shouldn't be having strong opinions.
You should be doing character development.
Because you obviously have none of it.
You want to have attitude without consequences. The nerve!
@Ukandi_one@_y3maya You can't adhere to an agreement, but you want the other party to pay the price for your disavowal.
You people don't know when to conceal your abusive nature.
Y'all be out here trying to make stupidity seem like a testament of quality character all because you can use grammar.
You can't create value out of thin air.
Don't be fooled by hours-long explainer videos, long whitepapers and buzzwords.
No matter how complex, advanced, or "revolutionary" your crypto is, there's a limited number of opcodes that exist on EVM, and Solidity is not magic.
Actually it's a very limited programming language. You can read state, write state, and move value between addresses, if you meet the conditions.
That's it. That's all any smart contract can do.
βββββββββββββββββββ
So since you can't create value out of thin air, what can a protocol do?
Obviously, users can add value by buying a token or by using a protocol that (for example) charges some fees or something.
But a protocol on itself can do just one thing:
It can only TAKE value from somewhere, not create it out of thin air.
Take it from one place. Move it to another.
βββββββββββββββββββ
SCADA's entire design is value redirection:
Trade happens on AMM β 1% taken (value redirected from trade)
β
Tax stored in protocol-owned LP (value redirected to liquidity)
β
Threshold met β SupplyBlock executes (90% of stored value redirected to buyback)
β
out of which
90% burned (value redirected to scarcity)
β
10% to stakers (value redirected to participants)
βββββββββββββββββββ
Take value from where it flows (trades).
Redirect it to where it compounds (burns + LP).
Simple.
$SCADA
nukethesupply. com
$SCADA punishes selling.
Not with words. With math.
When you sell SCADA:
1. You pay 1.2% sell tax
2. That tax feeds protocol-owned LP
3. LP accumulates until supplyBlock triggers
4. SupplyBlock buys SCADA from market
5. 90% burned. 10% to stakers.
So your sell tax funded a buyback that benefits everyone who stayed.
You left. Your tax made it scarcer for those who didn't.
βββββββββββββββββββ
It gets worse for the seller:
You gave up your share of a shrinking supply.
That share doesn't come back at the same price.
Because while you were out:
- Supply shrank (your tax helped burn it)
- LP deepened (your tax helped build it)
- Ratio shifted (your tax helped push it)
To get the same position back, you now pay more for fewer tokens.
You funded your own replacement cost.
$SCADA
nukethesupply. com
@ElonMuskPDA $Zazu season is very imminent.
Giga cat on Eth β
Big send potential π―
Don't fade β οΈ
0xfEc77a3C34C4a11a87bcdb6813343d105B33f262
#Eth#EthMemes
There are people on this chain that genuinely think market cap means something.
Sirs,
"Market cap" is the most misleading number in crypto. Not because Richard Heart said so, but because how a normal Uniswap v2 pool actually works.
And here's the kicker before I even start: the example I will show next is the BEST-case scenario. The least fake version. It only gets worse from there.
Picture a token where the whole supply is sitting in one pool, paired against real money (ETH/stables). Day one, before anyone buys, the math is honest: market cap = exactly the real money in the pool. 1:1. Fair.
Then people start buying. And the number quietly detaches from reality.
Immediately.
In a v2 pool, price isn't set by a crowd of bids. It's just a ratio between the two sides of the pool. Every buy pulls tokens out and pushes price up - and the fewer tokens left in the pool, the more violently the next buy moves it. Price doesn't climb in a straight line. It curves upward, faster and faster.
Since market cap = price Γ total supply, when price goes parabolic, market cap goes parabolic with it - multiplied across every token in existence, including the ones nobody bought.
Quick uniswap v2 math:
50% of the supply bought from the pair β market cap is 2x the real money inside
90% bought β 10x
99% bought β 100x
Now remember what I said at the start - that was the BEST case. The whole supply was in the pool.
That's almost never reality.
In your average launch, only a slice of the supply goes into the pool. The rest sits in dev wallets, team allocations, "marketing" bags, influencer payouts.. But market cap counts ALL of it - every token, at the price set by the tiny fraction that's actually trading.
So you have a price discovered by maybe 10-30% of the supply in a pool(s), then stamped onto 100% of the supply to print a giant headline number.
Fun fact: deeper liquidity doesn't save you. Fatter liquidity means price moves slower per dollar, a smoother ride up. But the gap between market cap and real money is exactly the same at every stage. You can't deepen your way out of it. You just take longer to reach the same illusion.
So next time someone flexes his token's market cap... just ignore it.
He's right about everything EXCEPT the conclusion.
The problem isn't crypto. The problem is the casino layer built on top of crypto. Strip that away and what's left?
βββββββββββββββββββ
Crypto isn't dead. The way most people DO crypto is dead.
And that's a good thing.
"Crypto's image and reputation are destroyed."
The reputation of WHAT exactly?
Memecoins? Yes, destroyed.
Influencer shills? Yes, destroyed.
Gambling platforms? Yes, destroyed.
Bundler-controlled launches? Yes, destroyed.
Good. Let it burn.
That was never crypto. That was a casino wearing crypto's clothes.
βββββββββββββββββββ
"Legit developers get destroyed because there's no buy pressure after the first 8 hours."
SCADA launched at $3K mcap.
Had its hype for three weeks.
Hype died 6 months ago.
Today: $650K mcap. 4.5x from ATL. 1000+ supplyBlocks. Two chains. Derivatives platform.
All built AFTER the hype died.
Because the mechanism doesn't need hype. It needs volume. Any volume. Even just arb bot volume.
Legit developers don't get destroyed if they build mechanisms that don't depend on hype.
βββββββββββββββββββ
"There is simply NO liquidity to make everyone happy."
Correct. Not everyone will make it.
But SCADA doesn't need "everyone" to be happy.
It needs:
- Any amount of volume (even $500/day from bots)
- Time
That's it.
Not liquidity from the next memecoin rotation.
Not attention from the next influencer cycle.
Just volume and time.
βββββββββββββββββββ
"The game is finished."
No, the CASINO is finished.
The casino where bundlers control launches.
The casino where influencers shill garbage.
The casino where degens chase 1000x and lose everything.
That game? Yes. Finished. Good riddance.
βββββββββββββββββββ
The real game hasn't started yet.
The game where mechanisms matter more than marketing.
Where code execution matters more than Twitter reach.
Where locked commitment matters more than hype cycles.
Where automated systems matter more than manual promises.
βββββββββββββββββββ
His conclusion: "The game is finished. Run."
My conclusion: The casino is closing. Real #crypto is just starting.
$SCADA
PLS: 0x69e23263927ae53e5ff3a898d082a83b7d6fb438
ETH: 0xa7d12701385abb9814f220d2df705b9fe75bfdfa
nukethesupply. com
@koop0x You mean the next multi-billion memecoin?
Scoop $Zazu at this price. This may be the last time you see this level.
0xfEc77a3C34C4a11a87bcdb6813343d105B33f262
#Eth#EthMemes