#Worcester MA has 429 registered day care centers, similar to this one that is registered to Cardoso, Marlecy Rodrigues.
She is approved to stuff TEN kids in this tiny 840 SF bungalow located at 106 Standish St. Anyone want to show up some weekday morning and see how many kids arrive?
Really? TEN kids in a residential neighborhood bungalow?
Are they even real? Do they really have kids registered?
@MassAGO@WCVB@nickshirleyy@agenturban@mikeminoguema@bostonherald can someone please look into this as it’s 4x the state avg.
Massachusetts subsidizes daycare centers through direct child care financial assistance (vouchers) and operating grants (C3). Subsidies range from roughly $40 to $105+ per day per child, varying by the child's age, regional cost of living, and whether the care is center-based or in-home
Think about how many of YOUR tax dollars are being STOLEN to subsidize these day cares, some of which have no children attending at all.
MA taxpayers are suckers!
This AI just exposed the BIGGEST legal insider trading operation in America.
A platform called GovGreed built a seven-layer machine learning system that cross-references every stock trade disclosed by every sitting politician against the bills their committees control, the campaign donations they receive, and the companies their votes directly impact.
It scored all 540 politicians currently in Congress. And the numbers are crazy:
56% of every stock purchase made by Congress in the last 16 months was on a stock directly affected by a bill the buyer later voted on. That is 6,170 out of 11,016 total purchases.
More than HALF of all congressional stock buys are on companies whose fate that same politician is about to decide.
343 of 540 Congress members actively trade stocks while holding access to nonpublic legislative information.
That is 63.8% of the entire legislature making market bets with an informational edge that would put any hedge fund manager in prison.
The AI identified 752 active "Triple Signals" in the current Congress. A Triple Signal fires when three conditions line up at once:
The politician sits on the committee controlling a bill, they traded stock in a company affected by that bill, AND they received campaign contributions from that same industry.
Bills carrying these insider indicators pass at 5.4 TIMES the normal rate.
Now look at the individual leaderboard:
- Nancy Pelosi's estimated portfolio sits at $194 million with a Greediness score of 98.1 out of 100
- Ro Khanna made 13,231 trades across 800+ different tickers
- Michael McCaul made 32,302 trades and filed 6,670 of them late
- Thomas Suozzi filed 86.4% of his trades late with an average delay of 396 days, meaning his disclosures landed over a YEAR after he made the trade
And then there is Lisa McClain, the fourth-ranking Republican in the House. She has made 1,443 trades in three years, more than 98% of all politicians tracked.
She violated the STOCK Act twice in a single year, disclosing up to $900,000 in trades months after the legal deadline. Her husband bought up to $250,000 in Elon Musk's xAI, which quietly converted into SpaceX equity before last Friday's $2 trillion IPO.
The penalty for all of this? A $200 fine.
The number of Congress members ever prosecuted under the STOCK Act since it passed in 2012? Zero.
And the cruelest part is this:
A bill to ban congressional stock trading was introduced in January 2026. It has bipartisan support. Over 80% of American voters want it passed.
But Congress is sitting on it, because the people who would have to vote yes are the same people making millions from the system staying exactly the way it is.
They write the insider trading laws, they exempt themselves from enforcement, they trade on the information those laws generate, and when they get caught, they pay a fine that is basically nothing.
The AI didn't discover anything Congress was hiding. It just organized what was already public into a pattern so obvious that nobody can pretend it isn't there anymore.
@WallStreetApes My dentist is awesome. He doesn’t take insurance, doesn’t push bullshit. My rear molar was cracked and kept getting food stuck in it, but not painful yet. We crowned it with a porcelain crown, no root canal needed, in the office, in one day, six years ago. It’s still perfect.
@MassDailyNews@DailyMail They are lying to people ; go to their site sign up & they will send you the NEW Location. ITS Still at BPL …. They think they are smarter than everyone else and are just Liars …… sign up; See for yourself
Governor, you should be the last person in America grandstanding about the Revolution. Massachusetts was the birthplace of resistance to government that taxed, controlled, ignored petitions, and treated citizens like subjects — and Beacon Hill is doing a modern version of that every day.
King George’s problem was government power without real accountability. Your Massachusetts has voters approving a legislative audit by 71.57%, and yet the political class still fights transparency instead of opening the books. That is not “preserving history.” That is behaving exactly like the kind of unaccountable ruling class the Revolution was fought against.
The Declaration listed grievances against King George as proof of tyranny. One of the core complaints was government overriding the people’s rights and representation. The Revolution was about citizens refusing to be governed by elites who believed they knew better than the people paying the bills.
And while you lecture the country about “history,” your administration signed another $425 million into the emergency shelter system, after the system had ballooned to thousands of families and required new criminal history, identity, residency, and lawful-status checks only after public outrage forced the issue.
So spare us the patriotic performance. The Revolution began in Massachusetts because people were sick of arrogant government, forced costs, ignored consent, and rulers hiding behind power. Sound familiar?
You don’t get to wrap yourself in Bunker Hill while governing like Beacon Hill’s version of King George.
@WhiteHouse@RapidResponse47@TheJusticeDept@MA_vs_Healey@MassFiscal@massgop@agenturban @LocalPoliticsis @Guns_Gadgets
Nothing says transparency like writing a transparency bill in secret with no public hearing, passing it in 24 hours, blocking the courts from stepping in, and burying a loophole letting the Senate refuse an audit entirely!
https://t.co/aFrd0ynUQu
Ready to have your mind blown?
Read this very slowly…
Reid Hoffman pays Roberta Kaplan to represent EJ Carroll against Trump.
Reid Hoffman funds Indivisible via ActBlue for their “Tesla Takedown” campaign after Elon and DOGE expose NGO fraud like SPLC.
SPLC funds fake racism for Charlottesville operation.
Roberta Kaplan represents Charlottesville victims.
Joe Biden uses Charlottesville operation as reason for running for President.
Joe Biden appoints Matthew Graves to prosecute J6.
Matthew Graves wife Fatima Graves sits of Indivisible Board.
Roberta Kaplan and Fatima Graves start “Times Up Legal Defense Fund” together.
Fatima Graves and Indivisible run “No Kings” protests.
A tangled web…
@MassFiscal I’m tired of being taxed to death in this state. Voters sent a loud and clear message and our “representatives” ignored it. Taxation without representation. The only reason to fight us is because they have lots to hide. The revolution started here, we desperately need another.
There is a reason the fight over the audit law has dragged on for over a year, despite being approved by 72% of voters.
The original ballot question was clear and it passed overwhelmingly.
Massachusetts voters did not ask for a negotiated audit, a limited review, or for the Legislature to define its own terms.
The people approved an independent audit of the Legislature.
Now, the response from Beacon Hill is a bill that:
• Narrows the scope of what can be examined
• Allows the Legislature to decide what records will be provided
• Prevents courts from stepping in when disputes arise
Who has ever heard of an independent audit where the entity being audited gets to decide what can be investigated?
At the same time, lawmakers are presenting this as a “transparency package.”
But even they acknowledge that many of the “new” public records provisions simply codify documents that are already available today.
So what is actually changing? The audit.
And that is exactly where the restrictions are being added.
As Auditor @DianaDiZoglio warns in this clip, this is not an expansion of transparency. It is a restructuring of a voter mandate into something Beacon Hill can define, limit, and control.
For the people of our state, the core question is straightforward:
Should the Legislature be able to redefine a law that 72% of voters already passed when it becomes inconvenient?
Congressman Tim Burchett confirms on Joe Rogan that Bill Gates is behind the massive increase in ticks
Now we have a whistleblower who says pilots are being paid to drop ticks by aircraft
This matches accounts in America of tick boxes being found
“We are paid to spread ticks by air. It happens twice a year, early spring and early fall. This year we've been hired to do it earlier. The company receives the ticks in boxes. Each box contains millions of ticks. The aircraft used are generally single or dual prop aircraft, single pilot, and There's one other passenger that handles the dispersal. It pays a lot, and I mean a lot.”
“Here we have a whistleblower saying that they are paid to disperse ticks across Canada. Now, this sounds eerily familiar to what we're hearing about these boxes of ticks that are being found” in America
The Gates Foundation funded a biotech firm called Oxitec for research on genetically modifying cattle ticks
Farmers claim to be funding “boxes of ticks”on their properties
Lyme disease cases are skyrocketed right at the time when a Lyme disease vaccine is actively in the works
So without the ticks, they can’t sell their vaccines
You’ll never guess who’s making it, Pfizer and Valneva
I can’t believe what I just read…
🚨 Peer-reviewed paper in Bioethics discusses the “Beneficial Bloodsucking” of ticks— how the Lone Star Tick making people allergic to Meat is a GOOD THING
The authors say:
“If eating meat is morally wrong, then we should actually welcome this tick-borne allergy instead of trying to prevent or cure it.
They argue that deliberately spreading AGS (for example, by releasing or genetically modifying ticks) could be a form of moral bioenhancement — a scientific way to help people become better (more ethical) by making it physically hard for them to eat meat.
Their main reasoning (the “Convergence Argument”)
They claim that promoting AGS meets three simple tests that make an action morally good:
1. It helps stop something bad (meat-eating and its harms).
2. It doesn’t violate anyone’s rights.
3. It encourages people to act more virtuously.
Pub med
https://t.co/56RFCRBgRD
Reader friendly paper
https://t.co/4nmnWs90AS
A Norwegian neuroscientist spent 20 years proving that the act of writing by hand changes the human brain in ways typing physically cannot, and almost nobody outside her field has read the paper.
Her name is Audrey van der Meer.
She runs a brain research lab in Trondheim, and the paper that closed the argument was published in 2024 in a journal called Frontiers in Psychology. The finding is brutal enough that it should have changed every classroom on Earth.
The experiment was simple. She recruited 36 university students and put each one in a cap with 256 sensors pressed against their scalp to record brain activity. Words flashed on a screen one at a time.
Sometimes the students wrote the word by hand on a touchscreen using a digital pen, and sometimes they typed the same word on a keyboard. Every neural response was recorded for the full five seconds the word stayed on screen.
Then her team looked at the part of the data most researchers had ignored for years, which is how different parts of the brain were communicating with each other during the task.
When the students wrote by hand, the brain lit up everywhere at once.
The regions responsible for memory, sensory integration, and the encoding of new information were all firing together in a coordinated pattern that spread across the entire cortex. The whole network was awake and connected.
When the same students typed the same word, that pattern collapsed almost completely.
Most of the brain went quiet, and the connections between regions that had been alive seconds earlier were nowhere to be found on the EEG.
Same word, same brain, same person, and two completely different neurological events.
The reason turned out to be something nobody had really paid attention to before her work. Writing by hand is not one motion but a sequence of thousands of tiny micro-movements coordinated with your eyes in real time, where each letter is a different shape that requires the brain to solve a slightly different spatial problem.
Your fingers, wrist, vision, and the parts of your brain that track position in space are all working together to produce one letter, then the next, then the next.
Typing throws all of that away. Every key on a keyboard requires the exact same finger motion regardless of which letter you are pressing, which means the brain has almost nothing to integrate and almost no problem to solve.
Van der Meer said it plainly in her interviews.
Pressing the same key with the same finger over and over does not stimulate the brain in any meaningful way, and she pointed out something that should scare every parent who handed their kid an iPad.
Children who learn to read and write on tablets often cannot tell letters like b and d apart, because they have never physically felt with their bodies what it takes to actually produce those letters on a page.
A decade before her, two researchers at Princeton ran the same fight using a completely different method and ended up at the same answer. Pam Mueller and Daniel Oppenheimer tested 327 students across three experiments, where half took notes on laptops with the internet disabled and half took notes by hand, before testing everyone on what they actually understood from the lectures they had watched.
The handwriting group won by a wide margin on every question that required real understanding rather than surface recall.
The reason was hiding in the transcripts of what the two groups had actually written down.
The laptop students typed almost word for word, capturing more total content but processing almost none of it as they went, while the handwriting students physically could not write fast enough to transcribe a lecture in real time, which forced them to listen carefully, decide what actually mattered, and put it in their own words on the page.
That single act of choosing what to keep was the learning itself, and the keyboard had quietly skipped the choosing and skipped the learning along with it.
Two studies. Two countries. Same answer.
Handwriting makes the brain work. Typing lets it coast.
Every note you have ever typed instead of written went into your brain through a thinner pipe. Every meeting, every book highlight, every idea you captured on your phone instead of on paper was processed at half depth.
You did not forget those things because your memory is bad. You forgot them because typing never woke the part of the brain that would have made them stick.
The fix is the thing your grandmother already knew.
Pick up a pen. Write the thing down. The slower road is the faster one.
Full breakdown of the new January 6th report
- The FBI deployed 26 paid confidential informants in Washington DC on January
- 4 entered the Capitol building during the events
- 13 entered the restricted areas around the Capitol
- This means over a dozen FBI-linked informants were actively in the “riot” or restricted zones
- CHS provided intelligence that Jan 6 “was gonna get a little hairy.” FBI HQ allegedly did nothing to prevent escalation and later claimed otherwise to Congress
- ZERO charges against any of their FBI informants
FBI covered up details before the election, confirmed Director Christopher Wray announced his resignation timing tied to report release
- Media and Democrats pushed the “inside job by Trump” while dismissing FBI and Antifa involvement, despite early knowledge of CHS numbers (THEY KNEW)
- Jan 6 politically benefited Democrats with impeachments, indictments, criminalizing MAGA, Jan 6 Committee focus
- No accountability for uncharged informants despite “greatest attack on democracy since 9/11” rhetoric
- There were allegedly payment made. Congress needs more details on CHS (Confidential Human Source)’s conduct, payments for hotels and more and pre-event activities
- Says the FBI, media, and prior investigations are all not credible
This only means one thing. Democrats used the FBI to stage an insurrection against Donald Trump. They tried to cover their tracks by hiring outside people to be agitators, then have those people they hired immunity against prosecution for doing the same activities they prosecuted Americans for
All to steal the election and rush certification of their stolen election
Inside job. Treason.
@libsoftiktok@framinghamps@AAGDhillon Born and raised in the Commiewealth of Taxachusetts. I’ve thought about leaving but then I remember that I used to really love it here. I’m not willing to just give it up. So, I will stay and fight these idiots, clowns, and commies. Many here are finally waking up. Pray for us!
INSANE
Framingham Public Schools (@framinghamps) in Massachusetts is reportedly awarding stipends through employment contracts to certain staff, "in recognition of being BIPOC."
There’s no way this is legal @AAGDhillon
Oh look….the one person who has spoken from aboard the Cruise Ship where the alleged Hantavirus broke out (reading from a script) Jake Rosemarin - was also a Crisis Actor & worked for Pharmaceuticals curing COVID.
Humanity deserves better Psyops.
@islantstudio And then we vote on it and they just do whatever they want anyway. It’s just about time for pitchforks and torches with some tar and feathering and maybe bringing back the stockades to get them to finally work for the people instead of themselves.