@ciaran032012 ๐ถ Dog found guilty of theft
๐ Criminal birds
๐ด Give horses the right to own property
๐ต Equal opportunities for monkeys
๐ท pigs have the right to vote
Yes, arguments are stupid when you start from the belief humans/animals are interchangeable
You destroyed yourself ๐คฃ๐คฃ๐คฃ
@ciaran032012 You are such a moron if you think that there is an equivalence between the two that the argument MUST stand up or it is invalid
Morality is a human concept, it doesn't apply to animals.
Thats why reversing the argument is ridiculous. Wau to miss the fucking obvious
@ciaran032012 Of course they sound hilarious. You automatically believe humans & animals.are equals, hence reversing the argument sounds stupid because it shows they are not.
Why don't dogs get drivers licences?
Thats ridiculous, because they are dogs
@ciaran032012 No. Answer then fucking question first before you miadirect by turning it around. You dont get to ignore responding so you can ask it back first
@ciaran032012 IF veganism is about treating animals with moral value, THEN that should either apply to all animals or there should be a rational explanation for why some animals are not included in the special treatment
I am still waiting to hear an explanation that makes veganism valid
@ciaran032012 Either killing animals are wrong & ALL animals are included, or if you are going to be hypocritical (my point), then you need to explain the arbitrary line YOU draw & why that is different to the consistent line that meat eaters draw
@ciaran032012 No it isnt. I am pointing put the hypocrisy in defining some deaths as being bad, bit others just being ignored because it doesn't fit the narrative. At what point am I saying that his argument is wrong because of his hypocritical behavior? It *is* the behavior i am highlighting
@ciaran032012 I dont even know how to parse your bullshit.
Who said anything about farming humans? Who mentioned hamburgers? How does that even remotely relate to my point about animals people overlook killing?
@euxneks @michaelshermer No, we don't need to. We as homosapiens have developed the ability to recognize biological sex from its surface features & instantly know how to respond.
The world has changed, hence the questions
What part of that doesn't make sense to you?
@igaraparana@CosmicSkeptic Oh & to all your gutless little like-button masturbators who furiously like comments but are too pathetically weak to hold arguments on their own or to even read responses, this action blatantly makes it obvious you are all.vietue signalling, not truly convicted to your cause
@igaraparana@CosmicSkeptic Yes there is a difference. One is reality & the other is the fallacy of composition whereby you take the worst case & pretend it is commonplace. And the bugs are killed on your windscreen, you are.clearing argument with some caricature you invented yourself, not me
@BraxHunter Nut picking fallacy
Lets all find "some X" who is the worst of the group (and they exist in ALL groups) and trumpet to the qorld how bad they are
That sounds very dishonest to me. Are you sure YOU are not the one who has to self reflect given how deceitful you are being?
@CJFerguson1111@CHSommers The sad part about this is what percentage who said no are really suffering from preference falsification and don't even realize it
@Maria_lin @PeterSinger 1. If you stopped breeding animals, then companies would have no use to care for those that are alive
2. Companies would go bankrupt, leaving the animals to the mercy of an environment they could not survive in
3. Calling the consuming of meat as being moral is incendiary
@Maria_lin @PeterSinger So you don't want people to all become vegans straight away? Qe can't be immoral for eating meat at the moment? It isn't wrong to farm animals?
Slavery was always wrong & always will be & could have immediately ceased without consequences
You guys advocate for genocide