@BlueGeorgia “Didn’t happen in 2024” but this very app pushed Trumps campaign whilst making no effort to provide balance. And the owner of this app did everything he could to get Trump in office so he could get benefits
@N3WO123@I_amMukhtar Doesn’t have to be legal to be kicked out of a private venue where the host is an organisation that campaigns against racism. Can’t say for sure but maybe what he says passes legally but it’s irrelevant in a private business
@Stephen_Mills85@CPFC ‘Forced out’ when they would have been paid out for the house and if they had any smarts they would have held out for above market value offers. You cannot be forced out of your home for a private company to expand their property.
@LarsAnders1620@Ericjduffy So you’ve framed it like you posted a random arbitrary number and a request to interview them but in reality you doxxed a prime minister?🤣 you’re right that the door was disproportionate but the arrest was warranted
@JumboDaniel4@kxsmo Who’s complaining for more spots? I said that CAF and CONCACAF were beneficiaries of ‘charity spots’ and insinuating any UEFA nation was gifted a place when their process was the same as normal would be wrong
@JumboDaniel4@kxsmo CAF has a lower average position in fifa rankings, even if you talk just of qualified teams CAF average qualifier is ranked ~41 vs UEFA ~21. Meaning 5 spots were opened up to a field containing lower ranked and lower quality teams
@JumboDaniel4@kxsmo It’s still 5 because CAF didn’t have access to int qualifiers. And with all due respect 5 extra spots amongst teams that average 30 places lower in the fifa rankings. It’s not their fault and I’m glad they get to be represented but the ‘charity spots’ benefit CAF
@zinzodin@kxsmo Wasn’t easier than ever, it was virtually the same process as normal. Slightly easier to get in the playoffs but still had to overcome two opponents and the process worked the exact same