@whignewtons Yeah! Long time listener, first time caller. I agree, though less of a slam dunk than flushing the evidence down the toilet. Call it 90/10. ๐
Hi @whignewtons - re: guy who wiped his phone with the duress pw, key is that he didnโt do it himself. He gave pw to cops; they wiped it! Tougher case without a close non-tech cousin, think! Tougher still: what if you set your duress pw to your bday and the cops guess it? ๐ค
@RobertFreundLaw Anything other than a checkbox with the words โI agree to arbitration and a waiver of the right to sue in courtโ is a fiction. Some fictions are legal and practical necessities. This is not one of them.
@RobertFreundLaw Sound advice. Do clients fight you on using check boxes? Whatโs the rationale for those making a conscious decision to stick with hybrid?
@MissEsqHire I took full paternity leave 6 weeks after starting a new biglaw senior associate job, and I had to lobby for it. The partners who recruited me strongly encouraged me to do it. You know, because itโs not 1995.
@adamscochran Exactly. Only downsides for the company. A more aggressive SEC would investigate potential insider trading based on this alone. Brian got a kick out of it, but so not worth the headache.
@ItsMattsLaw I get your narrow point here, but every consumer attorney in this country would tell you adhesive arb clauses / class waivers stack the deck against consumers. They have nothing in common with arb clauses in negotiated commercial Ks.
@ItsMattsLaw@mfrancesryan โYouโ canโt start a mass arb. There are a handful of firms that have the resources and capital to do it, and the incentives have to align. The consumer is out of luck unless one of them picks the fight.
@SteelToeScribe@ForemanTaxLaw It works, but they have to agree in advance. Same for deep background. Journalists respect these agreements and have vested interests in not burning sources.