Husband, and proud father of 2 beautiful girls. Clinical Pharmacist specializing in Infectious Disease and Informatics. MLG video production in a previous life.
@Grummz Bro moves product. That’s all that matters. He’s moved so far from video games into politics it’s probably time to switch. They’re only announcing it to virtue signal to those that like virtue signaling (ie crazed leftist loons)
The building at 617 Heron Dr (Logan Twp, Gloucester Co) houses Savita Naturals, a processor specializing in CBD solvent extraction, cold pressing & refining of plant oils (chia, cocoa, saw palmetto, etc.). These ops use highly flammable solvents that can trigger massive explosions if ignited or mishandled.
No official cause confirmed yet. Building fully collapsed & burning; 2 severely burned, 1 possibly trapped. 2-mile shelter-in-place in effect around Heron Dr/High Hill Rd. Developing fast—stay safe & avoid area.
Yes, I can. In fact, I'm telling you all yet again that the answer to this question is right there on the last page of the Communist Manifesto and is not actually hard to answer.
The Left has adopted the logic of totalitarianism, called the friend-enemy distinction. There's a declared enemy (the West, "the existing social and political order of things"), and anyone who fights that declared enemy is a friend.
The radical Right also holds this criterion in politics and is therefore also siding with Iran. (In fact, the term "friend-enemy distinction" was the explicit logic of the Nazi regime thanks to Carl Schmitt.)
The radical Islamists also hold to this logic under their radical and hardlining interpretation of the Islamic doctrine called al-walâ' wal-bara', which means "loyalty and disavowal." The radical Left calls this doctrine "solidarity." The radical Right calls it "NETTR (No Enemies To The Right)."
@BowTiedBull Negative interest rates for families with children <18 and on no government assistance. No mass investment, only benefits productive, working families.
@DeTocqueville14@barnes_law Un no, that’s from 0:26 in the video linked. After reaching back. And quite clearly actively reaching back in the frame you say precedes reaching.
There is no standard for self defense
There is no standard for justification
The only standard is the 4th Amendment under Graham v Conor (1989)
And it doesn’t involve what you think someone should have done after looking at multiple video angles.
@barnes_law Everyone in these videos sincerely believes they are defending themselves against the state. So what justifies that belief?
They could just openly declare their position and take up arms. Instead they’ll just keep following Alinsky’s playbook.