Dc

[BSCN @BSCNews]

CZ Says Saylor's Strategy STRC Is Too Complex

Binance founder Changpeng Zhao (@cz_binance) says he needed multiple attempts to understand Strategy's STRC, calling the product potentially too complex and over engineered.

He also argued Bitcoin may not be the best asset for leverage because of its volatility.

“At some point, he’s gotta sell some Bitcoin,” CZ noted.

His comments come as STRC remains below its $100 par value after recent pressure.

[Dc @FX8388]

@FlareNetworks @HugoPhilion @stephenchip @Jeff_OnTheChain Did @HugoPhilion answer the question when?

[Dc @FX8388]

@calminspace @Firelightfi as always don't follow time line. getting sick of it

[Dc @FX8388]

@FV887606 Retest and goes up

[Dc @FX8388]

@KingKaranCrypto It will be huge but no enrollment yet. Patience is running thin.

[Dc @FX8388]

@JeeC84 @FlareNetworks Just a wick

[Dc @FX8388]

@itzbanknotez @FlareNetworks @FlareDevHub Not just hype. Show POPI to the community.

[Dc @FX8388]

@FV887606 Yes. It will double in a short period of time

[Dc @FX8388]

@FV887606 uptrend with maximum squeeze, i believe is going to break above EMA50

[Dc @FX8388]

@0xQuantic Yes

[Dc @FX8388]

@FV887606 Daily chart is at maximum squeeze

[Dc @FX8388]

@calminspace 32x from the current minted FXRP. Highly unlikely.

[Dc @FX8388]

@nanashemefan Where do you see the accumulation?

[Dc @FX8388]

@FV887606 The 4H chart is showing maximum volatility compression

[Dc @FX8388]

@timrowley @4DadsFtso Flare but not $FLR

[Dc @FX8388]

FIP.16 feels like a failure to address the real issue: FLR price. Cutting inflation, raising fees, and restructuring rewards may help the network on paper, but it still does not give FLR holders a clear, direct path to value accrual. Most of the benefits seem to flow to the system, validators, and future ecosystem plans and not to ordinary holders who have been waiting for stronger token performance. It also highlights a broader marketing failure. Flare keeps building and proposing structural changes, but the market still does not clearly understand why FLR should be owned, demanded, and valued higher. If that message is not landing, then the strategy is not working. If the goal was to restore confidence in FLR, this proposal is nowhere there. Holders need a model that creates real demand, stronger buy pressure, and clear value capture for the token itself. Without that, this is just more restructuring, not a real solution.

[Dc @FX8388]

@FV887606 The native tokens created by the gang was never the focus. It was meant to pull in the money to develop the chain and let it die.

[Dc @FX8388]

FIP.16 feels like a failure to address the real issue: FLR price.

Cutting inflation, raising fees, and restructuring rewards may help the network on paper, but it still does not give FLR holders a clear, direct path to value accrual. Most of the benefits seem to flow to the system, validators, and future ecosystem plans and not to ordinary holders who have been waiting for stronger token performance.

It also highlights a broader marketing failure. Flare keeps building and proposing structural changes, but the market still does not clearly understand why FLR should be owned, demanded, and valued higher. If that message is not landing, then the strategy is not working.

If the goal was to restore confidence in FLR, this proposal is nowhere there. Holders need a model that creates real demand, stronger buy pressure, and clear value capture for the token itself.

Without that, this is just more restructuring, not a real solution.

[Dc @FX8388]

FIP.16 mostly tries to fix tokenomics plumbing, not create an immediate buy reason for FLR. The proposal focuses on lowering inflation, increasing burns, redirecting protocol fees into FIRE, and pushing more rewards toward validators and stakers. That can improve structure, but it does not create a direct cash flow or guaranteed benefit for a passive holder sitting on FLR.

[Dc @FX8388]

@FlareNetworks Show it on the price not just hopium everyday