[1/8] Excited to present our work "ConnectomeBench: Can LLMs proofread the connectome?" at NeurIPS 2025 Datasets and Benchmarks!
https://t.co/oWWeGgylip
copyright law seems actively anti-human at this point. I still can't have full-text search over the world's books, but because the LLM providers are de facto allowed to train on them, the incentives point me to read bastardized LLM-paraphrases vs direct quotes from human authors
@gleb_razgar if we define techno-humanism as technologically accelerating that what current/future/evolved humans would see as valuable we agree that it's the only good thing?
@byersblake cool that you are building this and good luck but boooh for not giving credit to @isaakfreeman@h_rosengarten2 who you got the idea from
integrity pays off in the long run!
just became a lot more bearish on BCI - even at the recently accelerated pace, electrode interfaces with just 1% of the human cortex still seems wildly out of reach...
how can we reach actual cortex-scale interfacing 50 years sooner?
@louis030195 damn respect, that's 1 book read every 3 days!
what would you say is the optimal frequency to optimize not only *no. of books read* but also content learned/absorbed / pondered on a deeper level? is 3 days optimal?
IMO, GPT-type world modeling is necessary but most likely not sufficient for AGI. LLMs excel in pattern completion but they lack a coherent self-representation and they can only *simulate* agency. (which may never converge onto *having* human-like agency in the current paradigm)