🚀 Introducing OpenZL, a new #opensource, format-aware compression framework!
It uses a unique “graph model” for compression, enabling modular, high-performance codecs and a universal decoder - perfect for structured data at scale
Link: https://t.co/XynPVXXw3I
#DataCompression
We are open-sourcing OpenZL, a new data compression library and training tools to generator specialized compressors for structured data, achieving performance levels inaccessible to classic generic algorithms:
https://t.co/cJJVpqGBK6
Can't cram in a movie on your busy schedule??
Settle in for an unsettling 45 minutes with CRAM! 😈
#CRAM is available today on @Tubi and more!
TUBI: https://t.co/YMIPm6zfNi
@absidell@coopercooperco In response, my first adjustment in Lightroom is now always to adjust the channel scales myself to fix these mismatch errors, by manipulating the endpoints of the channel curves.
With 10 DAYS left to study like your life depends on it before CRAM drops on-demand & streaming, I’m excited to share more rad behind-the-scenes highlights🤘
And there’s nobody radder than one of the original Rad Rhinos himself: @felixhandte 🦏 — CRAM’s cinematographer! 🧵
I wonder how much waste has been eliminated by Yann Collect creating zstd.
When I ran the numbers at Twitter, which is tiny compared to the huge tech companies, switching to HDFS to zstd was ~ mid 8 figs/yr.
Across the world (not annualized), it seems like must be >= 9 figs?
@steveyedlin Man, I’m sorry. I’m really trying to resist going further down the https://t.co/IxQn2ryrq4 rabbit-hole.
But I think it comes down to this: I’m talking about cd/m^2 and you’re talking about lm/m^2.
Energy (lm) = intensity (cd) * area (aperture).
@steveyedlin Is it that intensity (cd/m^2) matches between the object and the image? Or that total flux (lm/m^2) matches between the object and the image? Or something else?
@steveyedlin Fair. I tried! But it's not clear to me what the fundamental conclusion you're reaching is. Apparently, the statement I thought you were arguing for is one we both don't agree with. So what is true of shooting at t/1.0 that you're saying isn't true of other apertures?