I was in a meeting earlier this year, and I mentioned I thought diesel was in a world of hurt. The other person said he bought Haliburton, and it was all the same trade...
Must-read by my friend Lakshmi.
As my Commodity Compass subscribers already know, for me, the most interesting — and most rewarding — force in cyclical commodities is a regime change.
They are rare and often misunderstood by casual commodity observers (think the copper US tariff price mirage).
In oil, we are witnessing what I called the great value migration from upstream to downstream — from E&Ps to refiners.
The transformation doesn’t stop there. Tankers, too, are experiencing a profound supply-side dislocation with duration.
These are hardly the only beneficiaries. We are operating in what I call a « war economy », with structural consequences that extend far beyond oil.
The key is to recognise these regime changes early, understand their duration and position capital accordingly. That’s where the real money is made in cyclicals.
@triiistn Likely the main thing would be a return to more market-based fuel pricing. There could be further divestments, similar to Jair's term. Selling off control is unlikely, IMO.
The two most important things a Brazilian president can do for energy independence is to continue reducing government oversight of $PBR and stimulate new exploration in the pre-salt and equatorial margin. Brazil's medium crude is in demand and its location is a huge advantage
🇧🇷Brazil's oil is now on the ballot.
Brazil pumped a record 4.62M b/d in August, up 18% in a year.
Most of it comes from the deepwater pre-salt fields offshore Rio and São Paulo.
Petrobras operates most of that output, and the state controls Petrobras.
That's why oil investors watched the first round closely.
Flávio Bolsonaro took 47% to Lula's 44.9%, beating polls that had Lula ahead.
Petrobras ADRs jumped about 10% the next morning.
The market was pricing the government's grip on Petrobras: fuel prices, dividends and where the investment goes.
The runoff is on 25 October, and it looks close.
What each result means for Petrobras and Brazil's oil growth, in my analysis 👇
https://t.co/tbGrpeOggH
In 2012, Delta purchased a recently shuttered refinery in Pennsylvania for $150 mil, plus another $100 mil in planned capex to restart it. The investment got off to a rough start but lately has been a windfall.
There is a lot of debate about whether/how airlines should hedge their jet fuel exposure. Airlines can add fuel surcharges when prices spikes and pass the added costs to customers. Higher fuel costs are correlated with a stronger economy and higher demand for air travel, providing a natural hedge. And if other airlines choose not to hedge but collectively help set ticket prices, your hedges may not be reducing risk.
In addition, corporate finance experts are highly skeptical of upstream vertical integration, particularly of commodity inputs. It adds unnecessary complexity and is often a poor allocation of capital. Companies typically vertically integrate at the moment of maximum frustration with the supply chain, when asset prices are at their peak, and then divest when markets are loose and asset values are low.
Originally, the purchase was a mess. Superstorm Sandy disrupted the restart. Refinery margins fell. Prices for renewable credits soared.
In these situations, a successor CEO will often unwind the integration. Indeed, the 5 years after the then-CEO left in 2016 were terrible for refineries.
Luckily for Delta, they didn't dump it at the bottom. The successor and still CEO had been involved in the decision to buy it and has stuck with the strategy. And since 2022, it's printed money.
Refinery margins spiked in 2022-23, generating >$1.1 billion in operating income. In 2Q of 2026 alone, it made $351 million. And 3Q results, when released, will be even better.
This case study alone doesn't validate upstream integration. There are still many reasons to be highly skeptical. It is a lesson that if you choose to do so, you have to have long-term commitment to the strategy. Too often, these decisions are made based on the most recent years of performance.
Brazil’s Achilles heel is diesel. Brazilian ag is in a world of hurt from credit and fertilizer costs, compounded by skyrocketing diesel prices. Meanwhile $PBR subsidizes local diesel at a huge cash (import) and opportunity cost (domestic). Food prices will have to rise.
Biodiesel in Brazil is screening cheaper than petroleum diesel imports...
The country is heavily subsidizing diesel imports as a national testing program is underway for blends above B15.
Back on X - will try to be more active again. Working with @markfny to build more energy infrastructure in the U.S. and what we think is a revolutionary sulfur product.
$TTE exiting U.S. offshore wind because "it's too expensive to develop". Coincidentally, our point 2 years ago on our first even Early Look.
And more to the point, $TTE is reinvesting in US LNG
@dehenau_@texasrunnerDFW Lots of boomers on fixed income getting killed on HOA and property taxes in FL. Lots getting killed by property taxes in high-cost states like NY, CT. Homes goes up in “value” property taxes go up.
That doesn’t math:
1- most of those 303 billion are not recoverable at $57/bbl
2- you’re assigning no time value of money or cost of extraction to the 303 bn bbl of “reserves”. Oil doesn’t just show up on a boat, ready for sale
3- VZ exports 300-400 thousand bbls/d, less than one-tenth of the U.S.