@maistrehispano No entiendo muy bien la conexión de las ideas: La causa final cesó? Yo diría que el bien común no puede haber cesado como causa final porque de lo contrario no habría polis. Parece que el orden del que hablas es el que ha dejado de ser deseable porque...
The great Scholatic works deserve to be digitized and freely available.
I am ditizing the work of Billuart so that it's accessible to more people.
If you care about making the wisdom of the Scholastics more widely available become a contributor at https://t.co/jYqQEzfGVY
«Moralizar la sociedad exige politizarla, y la politización de lo social supone necesariamente la 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜́𝑛 de lo político.
La desaparición del Estado, como monopolio de lo público, es la condición para que la sociedad deje de ser el ámbito de la autonomía de lo privado, y pase a consistir en una forma de responsabilidad compartida en la realización del bien común».
𝐸𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑠 𝑦 𝑃𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑠, Alfredo Cruz Prados
"Actus voluntatis, scilicet, electio mediorum, est motus secundi generis, qui est actus perfecti; et ita voluntas potest seipsam reducere in istum actum, et quatenus intendit finem, constituitur in actu primo et virtuali, quo se reducere potest in actualem et formalem...
I wonder seriously if one reason for the dearth of Dominican beati in modern times (apart from our many martyrs) may be the prevalence among us of Banezianism and neo-Banezianism insinuating a doubt of the perfect lovableness of God.
If you are currently transcribing/translating a text of Scholastic theology because you want it to be more easily accessible to a wider audience consider adding to https://t.co/jYqQEzfGVY
Heard about a recently published article, lets say generally in the area of Thomism, filled with hallucinated quotations. Easy to identify for someone who knew the scholarly territory.
The journal editor, when offered clear documentation and some standard options for correcting the scholarly record, refused to address it.
I expect something will be published about this eventually, but it is bad enough that "scholars" are polluting the discourse with AI slop. Fabricated quotations in scholarship about the history of ideas are especially insidious. It's somewhat disturbing that the problem wasn't caught during peer review. But since the corrupt article was published, it is much more scandalous that an editor wouldn't take easy and reasonable steps to safeguard the integrity of a journal.