@AleMartnezR1 The rest of the argument is just confusedly treating God as a real thing with real properties. But if you treat God hypothetically (as I have above), the force of the argument vanishes. If He exists, then He would have the properties you describe. It doesn't follow from this...
@DPadenAkaterry@United_Updates1@projo44@NotEvolution1 "First man" in biblical context means first human, physically formed, spiritually enlivened, imago Dei bearer, with no pre-existing hominid ancestors."
Yes, on this model, Adam is the first hominid who is an ensouled imago dei bearer.
@DPadenAkaterry@projo44@United_Updates1@NotEvolution1 "If it's more human than ape, then humans are on a continuum from apes" Why are quoting things I didn't say? Please answer my question. If I take your answer and twist it unfairly, call me out, but don't endlessly dodge questions. Can you answer the question?