Fix Nigeria Forum - (FNF) @FixForumNG - Twitter Profile

29 days ago

Bello Muhammad Goronyo, accepted leadership of a new support orgn dedicated to Pres. Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s re-election. The orgn (BMG) Associates for Asiwaju/Shettima 2027, was presented to Minister Goronyo....full story https://t.co/FybV50Zr0X.

FixForumNG's tweet photo. Bello Muhammad Goronyo, accepted leadership of a new support orgn dedicated to Pres. Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s re-election.

The orgn (BMG) Associates for Asiwaju/Shettima 2027, was presented to Minister Goronyo....full story https://t.co/FybV50Zr0X. https://t.co/aHpm4ACDcD

0

2

FixForumNG retweeted

M🦅

@mabrat_hr

about 1 month ago

BMG is steadily building momentum. Yesterday’s meeting further showed the growing coordination, organisation and political strength around Bello Muhammad Goronyo. The movement is taking shape.@bmgoronyo @AcsCongress

mabrat_hr's tweet photo. BMG is steadily building momentum. Yesterday’s meeting further showed the growing coordination, organisation and political strength around Bello Muhammad Goronyo. The movement is taking shape.@bmgoronyo @AcsCongress https://t.co/INADuRbTKJ

1

2

0

108

FixForumNG retweeted

M🦅

@mabrat_hr

about 1 month ago

I watched Gen. Christopher Musa’s interview on Nasir El-Rufai, and I have to say: I found some of his comments deeply disappointing. Not because Gen. Musa criticised a former governor. Criticism of public officials is part of democracy, and El-Rufai, like every other public official, should be open to scrutiny. What concerns me is the weight of some of the allegations. Musa alleged that El-Rufai deliberately planned the killing of people in Southern Kaduna and accused his administration of deliberately dividing Kaduna State. Those are not ordinary political criticisms. These are extremely serious allegations involving lives, security and the conduct of a former governor. And this is where I believe the standard should be higher. Gen. Christopher Musa is not an ordinary political commentator. He is a retired General, a former Chief of Defence Staff and currently Nigeria’s Minister of Defence. His words carry institutional weight. Nigerians listen to him differently because of the office he has occupied and the experience he represents. That is precisely why I expected more caution. If you make an allegation as serious as saying a former governor deliberately planned killings, Nigerians deserve more than references to videos, speeches and what people allegedly know. Show us the evidence. What exactly happened? When did it happen? What evidence establishes responsibility? What official records support the allegation? Because once you attach responsibility for deaths to a public official, you are no longer having an ordinary political argument. You are making an allegation that deserves to be treated with the seriousness it carries. And to be clear, asking for evidence is NOT defending El-Rufai. You can disagree with El-Rufai's policies. You can criticise his administration. You can question his decisions in Kaduna. You can discuss the insecurity and communal violence that occurred during his tenure. But serious accusations still require serious evidence. Today, El-Rufai's family has given Musa seven days to substantiate the allegation concerning Southern Kaduna killings or retract it. Now let's see what happens. For me, this should not become another APC vs opposition argument, Christian vs Muslim argument, North vs South argument, or Kaduna political fight. The issue is much bigger: When a senior public official makes a serious allegation against another public official, should Nigerians not demand evidence? I believe we should. Because if the allegation is true, the evidence matters. And if it is not properly substantiated, that matters too. Nigeria has suffered enough from politics driven by accusations, counter-accusations and emotionally charged narratives. We need facts. We need evidence. And above all, we need public officials to understand that the higher the office you hold, the greater the responsibility attached to your words.

mabrat_hr's tweet photo. I watched Gen. Christopher Musa’s interview on Nasir El-Rufai, and I have to say: I found some of his comments deeply disappointing.

Not because Gen. Musa criticised a former governor. Criticism of public officials is part of democracy, and El-Rufai, like every other public official, should be open to scrutiny.

What concerns me is the weight of some of the allegations.

Musa alleged that El-Rufai deliberately planned the killing of people in Southern Kaduna and accused his administration of deliberately dividing Kaduna State. Those are not ordinary political criticisms. These are extremely serious allegations involving lives, security and the conduct of a former governor.

And this is where I believe the standard should be higher.

Gen. Christopher Musa is not an ordinary political commentator.

He is a retired General, a former Chief of Defence Staff and currently Nigeria’s Minister of Defence. His words carry institutional weight. Nigerians listen to him differently because of the office he has occupied and the experience he represents.

That is precisely why I expected more caution.

If you make an allegation as serious as saying a former governor deliberately planned killings, Nigerians deserve more than references to videos, speeches and what people allegedly know.

Show us the evidence.

What exactly happened?
When did it happen?
What evidence establishes responsibility?
What official records support the allegation?

Because once you attach responsibility for deaths to a public official, you are no longer having an ordinary political argument. You are making an allegation that deserves to be treated with the seriousness it carries.

And to be clear, asking for evidence is NOT defending El-Rufai.

You can disagree with El-Rufai's policies.
You can criticise his administration.
You can question his decisions in Kaduna.
You can discuss the insecurity and communal violence that occurred during his tenure.

But serious accusations still require serious evidence.

Today, El-Rufai's family has given Musa seven days to substantiate the allegation concerning Southern Kaduna killings or retract it.

Now let's see what happens.

For me, this should not become another APC vs opposition argument, Christian vs Muslim argument, North vs South argument, or Kaduna political fight.

The issue is much bigger:

When a senior public official makes a serious allegation against another public official, should Nigerians not demand evidence?

I believe we should.

Because if the allegation is true, the evidence matters.

And if it is not properly substantiated, that matters too.

Nigeria has suffered enough from politics driven by accusations, counter-accusations and emotionally charged narratives.

We need facts.

We need evidence.

And above all, we need public officials to understand that the higher the office you hold, the greater the responsibility attached to your words.

0

2

0

52

Fix Nigeria Forum - (FNF)

@FixForumNG

Who to follow

Last Seen Users on Sotwe

Trends for you

Most Popular Users