@CeoNunneley@pmarca Use 1% of the floor to make ANYTHING ELSE like frozen yogurt or kale smoothies or something people like, shoes? Call the whole building that thing. Its a Froyo Factory! Its a Nike Air Research Center! Each one has a different cover story. All data centers will be invisible!
@AndrewBTC If you rent in SM and actually pay rent every month good luck competing with the business who hasnt paid rent in 5 months on price. LL cant lower rent because 'market rate is x, just need a good tenant, they are rare'.
@AndrewBTC Rents are SO HIGH that biz only pencils out when scammer convince an owner to rent to them, then stop paying rent, can make money in business. If you let in a chinese sunglasses reseller they will do whatever to stall eviction to make their profits, then repeat. Thus vacants.
@icanvardar@morganlinton I use gemini when I exceed the Grok 24 hour limit. Most people want to pay zero for LLM. Honestly the targeting ads I get from them parroting my search questions back as annoying ads is a high price so none of it is free really.
If you use Gmail, you need to read this.
Google’s AI, Gemini, can read your emails, attachments, bank statements, etc.
For many, this feature was switched on without consent.
Here's how to turn it off 🧵
1/
here are some facts about California. some of this is hard to believe.
first of all, it's important to understand the concept of "ballot harvesting," which is perfectly legal in CA. this refers to a situation where someone completely unaffiliated with the voter can collect and submit their ballot for them.
this flow is completely legal:
- a homeless person arrives in LA, where they are eligible for cash assistance, SSI, food stamps, healthcare through medical, and an array of other taxpayer-funded services
- they are registered to vote by an NGO (many such NGOs exist and explicitly do this).
- they do not have to provide a residential address or any proof of residency to vote. they only have to provide a mailing address, which can be anywhere (church, NGO HQ, homeless shelter). their home address can be "a park" or "an underpass".
- their ballot is mailed to the homeless shelter (or whatever address the NGO elects for them)
- the only verification done for the mail-in ballot is "signature verification" and uniqueness (only one vote per person is counted theoretically).
- the signature can be an X. if they register with an X, they can sign with an X. that is sufficient to pass verification. signature verification is also deliberately loose. the signature does not have to be a perfect match.
now consider the hypothetical scenario, which is fraudulent, but virtually impossible to detect:
- a homeless person cycles through the LA system. they get registered with their mailing address listed as the NGO HQ or homeless shelter
- they "sign" their registration with an X or nondescript, easily replicable signature
- they disappear. never seen again. or they exist, but it doesn't matter. they don't get purged from the voter rolls for 4-8 years typically.
- the address where they registered receives their ballot for several cycles
- operatives are aware that they have X amount of votes to make up. they fill in X many thousand mail-in ballots themselves. the ballots are manually postmarked (permitted). they forge the signature to match whatever signature (could be an X) was submitted upon registration
- ballots can be accepted even if they are postmarked at 11.59 pm. polls closed at 8 pm. (you would need an accomplice who is a USPS employee)
- the only fraud checks are de-duplication (if the homeless person through some miracle voted in person, only one of their ballots would be counted) and signature verification
- because very few of the homeless people in question would have voted in person, this gives NGO operatives tens of thousands of possible mail-in ballots to submit unilaterally.
the big problem is that there is NO way to detect this type of fraud. NGOs that register homeless people to vote exist. that isn't a secret. ballot harvesting is fully legal. voting by mail is encouraged. signature verification is as loose as possible. de-duplication doesn't solve anything, since few homeless people vote in person. and no one in power locally is going to spend political capital on rooting out such fraud, since they are all wholeheartedly committed to "voting rights".
in a situation where fraud is undetectable, the absence of hard proof of fraud is not evidence that no fraud exists.
Raman has gained around 20k votes since election night. She is around 3k votes ahead of Pratt now.
there are over 72 thousand homeless people in LA county.
Mr Beast says he could start a faceless channel tomorrow and hit 20 million subscribers in six months
“I could start a new channel tomorrow not using my face or my voice without ever promoting it and in six months have 20 million subscribers”
“It’s purely knowledge if you knew what I knew you could get 10 million views a video and 10 million subscribers no matter where you are right now within 6 months”
“It really is just knowledge”
I’m the look-around candidate. All you have to do to understand why I’m surging in the polls is just look around…the city is a mess and our leaders have failed.
Arkadaşlar kadın erkek farketmez şu seriyi kaydedin 5-10 gün 20 gün 50 gün ne zaman tam anlamı ile yapabilirseniz yapın 24 saniyede vücuttaki her kasınızı çalıştırır sizi makina yapar
If that addict on your street were your own son, what would you do? That is the defining question that guides my 5 step plan to fix the homelessness problem in LA. We *must* end this evil racket of corrupt politicians and NGOs who profit off the misery of these poor souls. They launder money and feed them more drugs, so they can keep their customers locked in this hell on our streets. We have a moral obligation from God to help them and make our city safe and clean for everyone. Karen Bass and Nithya Raman have forsaken this city. Time for real leadership. Time for real compassion.
Apple has published a paper with a devastating title: “The Illusion of Thinking”
It argues that AI models, no matter how brilliant they may seem, do not understand what they are doing.
They do not solve problems. They do not reason. They merely generate text word by word, trying to sound coherent.
Apple tested the most advanced reasoning models in the world on controlled puzzle environments. They tore open the internal "thinking" traces.
What they found shatters the narrative that we are getting closer to AGI.
Current models don't scale with complexity. They have a hard mathematical cliff. And they do not degrade gracefully. They collapse.
But here is the most unsettling part.
When a problem gets too complex, the AI doesn't use its remaining compute to try harder.
It just gives up.
Its reasoning effort actually declines. It stops thinking and starts guessing.
Then Apple ran the experiment that closes the casket on the reasoning debate.
They gave the AI the exact, step-by-step algorithm to solve the puzzle. The cheat codes.
All the AI had to do was follow the instructions.
It couldn't do it.
Performance didn't improve at all.
When the complexity gets high enough, these models fail because they cannot actually execute a logical sequence.
They are not reasoning. They are just pattern matching.
When you give them a simple problem, they overthink. When you give them a hard problem, they collapse.
Paper: The Illusion of Thinking, Apple, 2025
🚨 Anthropic just showed a 27-minute workshop on how to actually do prompts for Claude.
Taught by the people who built it.
Free. No registration. No paywall.
I've seen $300 courses that don't cover what they teach in the first 8 minutes.
Watch it and bookmark it now.
@TMZ’s Harvey Levin goes OFF on how Karen Bass has destroyed Los Angeles, with the last 4 years being especially bad, recounting homeless crazies smashing his car as he stood and watched, shrugging “I live in Los Angeles”, giving a campaign ad gift to @spencerpratt
💥NEW: Alan Dershowitz🇺🇸
“I’ve been a Democrat for 70 YEARS! I now am STRONGLY opposed to that party … I am SCARED of them!”
“I’m 87 years old. I don’t have the strength I had when I was 47 — but I’m going to use EVERY bit of strength I have to oppose the Democrats.”