Neil Jackson

[Jamie Andrews @JamieAA_Again]

Even Jabber Jeremy Clarkson can understand the absurdity with the Bovine TB test. They inject a load of chemical gunk into a cow, if the injection site swells at all they kill the cow.
Just the imprecision of the test alone of how it is measured is noted. But the true scam lies in monumentally stupid assumption that somehow puncturing the skin and injecting a foreign agent *shouldn't* injure.
Really they are taking the most healthy cattle and slaughtering them.
With 1 in 4 healthy people testing positive for TB, this scam is not getting any better with PCR tests either.

[ZUBY: @ZubyMusic]

One of the craziest things about the UK rape gang scandal is that it's largely considered a 'right wing' concern.

In a sane, serious country, it would be completely bipartisan. In fact, it wouldn't even be seen as a political issue, but one of basic justice and morality.

[Andrew Lawrence @andrewlawrence]

We're not voting our way out of this.

[John Olooney @OlooneyJohn]

Carer's Allowance is the primary UK benefit for individuals who look after someone with an illness or disability. [1]
•Weekly rate: £86.45 (or £345.80 a month).
•Minimum care requirement: 35 hours per week.
•Earnings limit: £204 per week after tax, National Insurance, and allowable expenses.

Yet when they put your loved one into care home they will lose their estate and that estate will be paid to the “carers” at a much higher rate. 5 or 6 thousand a month.
Why is there such a disparity in the cost of care ?

clearly, one of the main drivers and obstacles for people looking for care for a loved one is cost and having to work.

So why couldn’t people simply care for their loved ones at home sell their houses and live off the estate?
Let me tell you if they drew £5000, or £6000 a month off that estate as a family carer from everyone would call them con merchants wouldn’t they.

but no one bats an eyelid at a care home doing it.
many with little Care whatsoever in them.

Then there is standards of care and I would suggest if you were available full-time to care for your own parent or loved one that you would give them the very best Care they could possibly get.
You could have anything retrofitted and that could be paid for by the person’s estate, you could source it yourselves and get the best prices.

The point I makers there are far better far more cost-effective ways of caring for people.

I would always suggest somebody sell their property and move in with a family member and use that money to finance the Care. It would be much better care from a much better person they knew and loved and the money would be there to reasonably financed that .

I also suspect they would live much longer in family care rather than in care homes whether they are jabbed every half hour

[Richard Seiler @richardseiler]

𝘞𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘪𝘵 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘭𝘰𝘷𝘦

Jeremy Clarkson has never pretended to be anything other than exactly what he is

Brutally honest. No oil painting. A pot belly, a lifelong smoker, a drinker. Not exactly the modern alpha male or is he?

And somehow that is the whole point

I have watched him for most of my life
First as a motoring journalist who could make you want a car you would never own and never need
Then as something bigger
The loudest, funniest, most unfiltered mouthpiece the ordinary person ever had
A man who said the thing everyone was thinking while the rest of television tiptoed around it

From Top Gear he built something that should not have worked
Three middle aged men, The Stig, a track and a chemistry you cannot manufacture
James May the patient one
Richard Hammond the brave one
And Clarkson the force of nature dragging both of them into chaos and somehow back out again

When it all fell apart at the BBC he could have disappeared
The fracas was not his finest hour and he never pretended it was
He owned it, apologized and carried on
No reinvention, no groveling tour, no carefully managed comeback
He just kept being himself and let the work speak

The move to Amazon and The Grand Tour proved something I think a lot of people missed
The format was never the magic
The men were
You can take three friends out of a studio and drop them anywhere on earth and the loyalty between them travels with them

But it is Clarkson's Farm where the whole picture finally comes into focus

Here is a man with nothing left to prove walking into a field he barely understands and refusing to fake competence he does not have
He has run that farm at break even and then at an outright loss in full public view
No editing it into a success story
No pretending the numbers work when they do not
His farm manager hands him one brutal truth after another and he sits there and takes it

A whole season swallowed by drought even after he leaned into robotics and the most advanced farming money could buy
Technology was supposed to be the answer and the weather did not care
He showed that too
Most people would have cut it

And through all of it he has done something quietly remarkable
He has dragged the plight of the British farmer into the light
The paperwork, the council, the margins that vanish, the weather that ruins a year of work in a week
People who had never thought about where their food comes from suddenly cared because he made them care

And then there is the part nobody warned me about
Men who raise animals for meat and still love them
Who name them, worry about them, sit with them
Who treat them with respect and dignity right up to the moment they cannot keep them
And feel the full weight of sending them off

He does not hide that
He lets the camera sit in the discomfort of it
The grief of a man who knows the deal he made and still finds it hard

That is not weakness
That is honesty most people are far too afraid to show

We live in an age that rewards the polished, the curated, the carefully built personal brand
And here is a scruffy, swearing, chain smoking farmer who has done the opposite of all of it and won
He stayed exactly who he was while the world begged him to become a product

That is the whole secret
There is no act
There never was

And that is exactly why we keep watching

Praying for a full recovery mate, looking forward to another season of Clarkson's Farms!

[Sama Hoole @SamaHoole]

A country that cannot stop talking about food security has found a way to tax it at the graveside.

From this April, the unlimited relief that let a farm pass whole from one generation to the next is gone. Ministers will tell you the threshold is generous. The first £2.5 million of agricultural property is spared, £5 million for a couple, and they recite those figures like a defence. Then go and value a real farm. A few hundred acres, before the sheds and the machinery are even counted, clears the first threshold on the land alone. A working arable farm of five hundred acres or more sails past the couple's five million without trying. The number was built to sound like a mansion. It describes a medium family farm.

That is the part they would rather you missed. The tax scales with the land, and the land is how you grow the food. The more a farm feeds the country, the more acreage it needs, and the harder this falls on it. They sold it as a levy on wealthy men sheltering money in fields they never walk. It lands instead on the family that has walked those fields for a century, rich on paper and skint in the bank, clearing barely a wage from millions they cannot eat.

So when the farmer dies, the heirs meet a bill they can only pay by selling the very ground that grew the food. The asset is the farm. The income is a rounding error. Whatever sits above the threshold is taxed at twenty percent, half the normal rate, offered up as though a smaller knife were a kindness.

It got darker during the protests. A shadow minister said families had begun openly discussing whether they could afford for elderly relatives to live past April, because surviving into the new tax year might hand the next generation a bill that ended the farm. Believe it or not as you like. The fact it could be said out loud at all tells you exactly where we have arrived.

Tractors in Whitehall. Pensioners doing inheritance arithmetic against their own heartbeat. Banners reading no farmers, no food.

But food security is the priority. They say so in every speech.

[C3 @C_3C_3]

The Left is pushing for identification to use the internet while pushing for no identification to vote.

Think about that.

[Chris Heatherly @chrisheatherly]

I’m actually a child online safety expert and was one of the pioneers in this space with Club Penguin and so I feel uniquely positioned to critique this.

The groomer problem is real but it’s also vastly overstated. The far larger issue we saw at Penguin was suicidality or reports of sexual abuse in the home.

There is no solution for lazy/bad parenting. You can implement all the ID laws you want but if parents are going to just hand kids their phones unlocked, those kids will have access to all the same things the parents have unfettered.

What I found is that these draconian safety laws actually make it harder to be an honest operator of kids apps because on one hand it’s so much legal risk and so much user friction that it simply becomes uninvestible as a business.

Parents will just lie to let their kids use the unfettered internet. For example, I have a friend who works in mobile gaming who has two kids, one above and one below the age limit but separated by just 2 yrs, and the two wanted to play and chat together on Roblox - which is reasonable. To do this, he just verified that his younger kid is old enough for the chat feature when he’s not.

This happens all the time and will happen with these laws to. How far do we want to go with this? Scan the face of the user in real-time to make sure it’s not a kid using the device? We could do that but it feels like a massive unwanted intrusion of privacy.

That’s how you know this law isn’t about kids. COPPA and GDPR-K and so forth already make it illegal to allow chat and other grooming vectors to kids.

What’s really being done here is trying to eliminate online anonymity. And this is a far bigger issue that goes to core speech rights because if you cannot criticize the govt anonymously and if wrong speech is a crime then it becomes easy to identify all the detractors of the govt in power, and ban, fine or jail them for speech crimes.

Starmer has already been doing this and he wants to do it at a much bigger scale. Starmer won’t even acknowledge the problem of actual grooming gangs in Britain’s neighborhoods but he’s worried about online grooming?

No he’s not, and this hypocrisy gives away the game. What he wants is to kill online anonymity so he can enforce censorship of his unpopular policies. No politician should have this power.

[Michael O'Bernicia @TheBernician]

Six months after Australia implemented the world’s first ban on social media for children under 16 in December 2025, the legislation is widely considered to have failed in its primary goal of keeping minors off platforms.

Research indicates that 70% to 75% of children in the affected age group remain active on major apps, with many reporting that the ban had no impact on their online safety or usage habits.

[Maizy Daizy @MaizyDaizyZzzz]

The parents the social media ban for kids/teens is aimed at, will unlock the phones at device level and then hand them over to their 10 y/o.

Or are the state going to start arresting people because kids are in receipt of illegal phones? 🤔

[Alonso Gurmendi @Alonso_GD]

I’m not a tech person so maybe this is dumb but isnt it easier to create a “children’s phone” at point of sale so you get a phone with built-in restrictions rather than asking every single person in the country whether they are over 16 or not through hackable digital ID software?

[Valerie Anne Smith @ValerieAnne1970]

Dr. Russell Blaylock: "The tetanus vaccine is one of the MOST RIDICULOUS vaccines ever."

Just got a cut or puncture wound? The ER is about to BULLY you into a TOXIC shot you don’t need.

Here’s what they won’t tell you:

The shot they push is NOT a simple tetanus vaccine — it’s the full DTaP combo loaded with:
• Aluminum (up to 0.625 mg — a known neurotoxin)
• Formaldehyde
• 2-phenoxyethanol + Triton X-100
• Milk protein (casein) & latex residues that can trigger anaphylaxis or CREATE new dairy/latex allergies

The tetanus toxoid inside has NEVER been properly safety-tested in a double-blind placebo-controlled trial. CDC admits it.

It’s grown on beef heart infusion with real risk of Mad Cow prion contamination.

Your actual chance of getting tetanus? 1 in 11 MILLION.

Spores live in manure, NOT rust. Clean the wound properly — oxygen kills them. 95% of the decline happened BEFORE any vaccine thanks to sanitation.

If you’re already exposed, the shot is useless — it takes 3-8 weeks for antibodies.

But high-dose Vitamin C (1–3g/day) cured 100% of cases in studies with ZERO deaths. Cheap. Safe. Ignored.

Why are we terrorized into this untested, poison-filled combo shot for a disease that’s basically extinct in clean countries?

Because fear sells.

Don’t fall for the rusty nail myth. Clean the wound. Monitor it. Refuse the jab.

Were you guilt-tripped into a “tetanus shot?” Were you ever told it was actually the full DTaP?

[Laila Cunningham @policylaila]

My 17-year-old daughter:
“I’m confused. We’ve always been taught not to share personal information or anything that identifies us online because it isn’t safe. Now they want us to do exactly that to access social media.”

[Andrew Lawrence @andrewlawrence]

All credit to Labour, a very smooth transition from authoritarianism to totalitarianism.

https://t.co/ivjjOiVZzg

[Mila Joy @Milajoy]

I've been living through climate change for 60 years.

This is why I know it is a money-grabbing HOAX.

[Alex 🇵🇸🇱🇧 @foleywoley]

I don't mean to sound hysterical, but it's exceedingly obvious that the social media ban, the PA proscription, and the assisted dying bill are all unified moves by a government with no intention of bettering people's lives, only snuffing out dissent.

[June Slater @juneslater17]

In 2000 the average Brit was as well off as the average American.
Now the average Brit is 50% poorer than the Average American in the poorest state, Mississippi

[WasAcop @WasAcop]

🚨Labour confirms ID requirement at device level - VPNs useless.🚨

By forcing Apple and Google to verify age at the device level during phone setup…

Keir Starmer’s government isn’t protecting kids — it’s building a surveillance infrastructure.

The OS itself will restrict platforms like TikTok, Instagram and X, making VPNs largely useless because the block happens before any traffic leaves your phone.

🚨Once every device carries a verified age profile, authorities gain an easy route to identify users through legal requests to tech firms.

This is digital ID by the back door, sold as child safety.

Classic Labour: expand state control first, ask questions later.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

https://t.co/Ca4aMkAZqw

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

Digital currency is the ULTIMATE weapon of total control.

The next time you refuse an mRNA shot? They flip a switch and ERASE YOU.

No money. No food. No home. No future.

Instant starvation. Instant slavery. Instant death for non-compliance.

— Christine Anderson, German MEP

[Micktheskinz @Mickskinz]

Just had a twenty minute conversation with my 15 year old daughter.
The kids are laughing at this government. They are already planning how to get around it and they will believe me.
But the way they will do it leaves them far more vulnerable than how it is now.
This must be stopped otherwise we will have a generation of dark web users that otherwise would never have considered going on there. Because they are too preoccupied by social fucking media.
Believe me everyone I can guarantee this will backfire catastrophically.
Data breaches will be rife.
People will be stealing your identity and the next thing you will be blacklisted.
It's already happening in other countries.
This is a fucking disaster waiting to happen.
DO NOT UPLOAD A COPY OF YOUR ID TO A PRIVATE COMPANY.