Today @ScienceMagazine published “Policy reforms for antibiotic use claims in livestock” showing that “today’s ‘Raised Without Antibiotics’ labels lack integrity.” Paper co-authored by our CEO @kevinhlo & researchers from @battlesuperbugs@GWpublichealth. https://t.co/2yj0SAkZrf
@CoryBooker: "The widespread deceptive use of label claims such as ‘humanely raised’ and ‘raised without antibiotics’ is harming consumers and honest family farmers... the agency needs to quickly implement strong rules to clean up the marketplace.” https://t.co/3x8fL8KkDA
"These (antibiotic use) claims must be backed by empirical testing to validate producers who are truthfully using these claims and protect consumers from false and misleading labels." @battlesuperbugs@LanceBPrice@USDA@USDAFoodSafety
https://t.co/Cc0rY5tCr2
Important move by @USDA@SecVilsack to strengthen the veracity of “negative” antibiotics claims (“no antibiotics ever ") incl testing to assess antibiotic residues in cattle destined for the “raised without antibiotics” market. @USDAFoodSafety
https://t.co/DfpzACDDvP
With approximately 74 percent of medically important antibiotics sold in the U.S. being used in livestock, use and regulation must change. It’s time the USDA lives up to a critical element of its mission statement — effective management. And it must happen now.
an example of regulatory failure of U.S. gov't agencies to track antibiotic use in food animal production, restrict that use, collect information on the amount and location of antibiotics used in food animal production, and understand the rates of human infections caused by it
Robert Martin: There is an apparent absence of testing for “raised without antibiotics” labels approved by USDA’s Food Safety Inspection Service (FSIS)...
@GMA discusses misleading labels on 'raised without antibiotics' meat. Labels present an important source of information for people – we absolutely need stronger verification to ensure they are truthful. https://t.co/Elq1Z5LTHb
Antibiotic in antibiotic-free meat? We agree with @abcnews - "we do need a system where we can at least trust what the labeling says" https://t.co/dE5AGfziEB via @ABC
Thank you @SenBooker for shedding light on this important issue. Empirical evidence in @ScienceMagazine that these Raised without Antibiotics claims lack integrity. Verification needed to restore trust in these labels and protect public health.
Consumers are being misled into paying a premium for meat labeled “antibiotic-free." USDA must act swiftly to reform their oversight process and protect the public from being deceived by bad actors that prioritize profit over public health. https://t.co/MpHsp7M66y
Multiple studies found antibiotics in cattle that claim to provide antibiotic free meat to consumers. One option is to opt for grass fed beef. https://t.co/J0gh6tdcVD
A new #SciencePolicyForum argues that “raised without antibiotics” (RWA) labeling on consumer meat labels is not always accurate. The findings underscore the need for #Policy reform to ensure the integrity of RWA labeling claims. https://t.co/RKH65wSVEj #Agriculture
Brian Ronholm of @ConsumerReports: "Hopefully, these findings will begin a greater conversation about the need for the independent verification of these types of labels to ensure their value."
@ConsumerReports: "The lack of independent verification is the reason stand-alone “no antibiotics” claims received a Poor rating in CR’s Food Label Guide to Seals and Claims." https://t.co/uMox8jOOTI
@LanceBPrice believes the USDA should develop a program where cattle raised without antibiotics are tested, so the claim can be verified. “If the USDA isn’t going to test, then the retailers that are making a big markup on these products have to do it,” he says.