This is a few months old at this point, and I’d like to use it to illustrate some points:
There are many that would like to deflect from America being its own people because they psychologically concede Americas geopolitical domination of their feckless leadership. They cannot suffer the thought that the force that surpasses anything they can collectively muster belongs to the average American. There is baked in classic ressentiment.
America couldn’t be if not for the British?
Sure. Much like their empire would never had been if not for the Normans. Not for the Scandinavian invaders of Alfred’s time. Not for Britannia. Not for the Roman Empire and in that sense, to be British means to be Italian, right?
All peoples come from others and break off at significant points in history. Many of you still believe in the end of history and all categories of people were placed in stasis.
Canadians never sought to be a people. The kingdoms of the isles never sought to be a single entity. That’s never the point. People just are. They are an identifiable reality sometimes easier pointed out by those that don’t belong to it.
The single greatest act of submission to the GAE is this performative anti-Americanism. You are not allowed to resent any other people other than yourself because you have been thoroughly buck broken by modernity. You are dying because you forfeit vitality and agency every day. God did not call you spectators. He called you fishers and shepherds of men to redeem the nations.
Americans are the descendants of a wild and fringe subset of mostly Protestant Western Europeans. Everything to the max. These groups of people were already from almost ethnic subsets within their own origins. They were the n’er-do-wells. And their sons got into a wacky race to the moon ostensibly over the free-ness of eastern markets… and they won.
Everybody knows what an American is and that they don’t belong to it. The more you keep denying my people’s legitimacy, the more you lose your own people and legitimacy. You are speaking as an enemy. You are just a liberal.
Great post, @KaiserLoengramm
What’s really, really amazing are all those who think they get it and don’t get it. This is an instruction on HOW to get the guns. When Saul Alinsky was writing this, Leftists were just as capable of being armed as any other civilian in America. They could even made and used bombs and ran full on terror orgs.
None of that is “the guns.” That is the mistake the vast majority of the right makes, particularly those who talk of there being no political solutions, or that we aren’t voting our way out of this. Even though communists had these, he was still saying “we are through peace and reformation through the ballot.”
Because the guns referred to here are not you, your AR-15 and the world, or even some militia or other private organization. What Saul Alinsky is communicating is this:
“We must use elections in order to gain enough control over the political offices which control the police, the military, the federal agencies, install our people within these positions, and then we will use this to enact our ideas by force.”
Saul Alinsky understood what very few on the right do, which is that any change, revolution, restructuring, restoration, whatever you’d like to call it, to create a new system, is required to use the exact system you wish to unmake in order to do so.
This is a fairly rigid historical pattern, with exceedingly few deviations, that any successful internal change requires people and leaders who are in positions within the existing system using those positions, and by extension, the guns which they are in power over, in order to then create something new.
Caesar, Napoleon, the Bolsheviks (yes this does fit them, they were an official elected party under the February Revolution), Franco, Hitler, Pinochet, Mao (he fits the bill as well, the Chinese system at the time was regional warlordism, so he became analogous to a warlord), Emperor Meiji, Cromwell. Cut across eras, ideologies, and nations, and you will find the pattern as consistently as I’ve seen.
So, if you want to change the system, you need to actually use the system that exists. Because the other pattern you’ll find quite consistent is that peasant revolts of total outsiders who never seize power first, never get those in position on side as leaders? They always get crushed. Consistent failures.
So, all you’re truly left with, if you actually want to restore America, revolutionize it, or even destroy it, is that you would either need to have someone who is in a significant enough position in the federal agencies which control guns or military generals launch coups, which I find exceedingly unlikely to occur, or you would need to have people take civilian positions of power, whether these are at state or the national level.
So yes, you actually really don’t have any other option except to vote your way out of this, which is far too tough a pill to swallow for many idealists, so they opt for fantasies of collapse and the people rising up, both of which are quite laughable. The only solutions are political solutions.
I think what often rubs people the wrong way about the concept of a “Christian-Muslim Alliance” on the right, is that while it is true Muslims are less a problem minority than others in America, particularly those attached to Israeli influence which is obviously far more prevalent, or even the issues of the Indian lobby for that matter, is that I do actually care quite a bit for Europe as well.
And in Europe, by far, the worst group are the Muslims in them. Who have horrifically attacked young White women in England, in Sweden, in Germany, and all throughout every nation whose traitorous politicians allowed them within. The concept of trying to ally with them in anyway is simply repugnant, when I’d far rather try to build ties with other Europeans abroad than with Islam abroad, to only one of whom I share any kind of blood and culture with.
The other, well, they’ve always been an enemy, and they always will. The enemy of my enemy is often still my enemy, and has been since my nations inception as a sovereign. Nothing will ever change that.
A major reason a large segment thinks that Israel killed Charlie and has attempted to kill Trump multiple times is because it's psychologically a lot easier pill to swallow than the idea that the Left is extremely violent and lives right next door to you.
You know that you are not a significant figure and that a foreign government on the other side of the planet doesn't really care about you one way or the other. You are an accountant or an HVAC guy. You are well aware that the Mossad isn't going to kill you.
But the idea that guy who lives down the street who talks about "empathy" and "kindness" and "healthcare for everyone" would put a bullet in your head over the Trump sign in your yard is far more terrifying.
I have been very critical of America's relationship to Israel, but the obsession over it by many is actually a defense mechanism that allows you to pretend the threat to your way of life and your life itself isn't right in front of you at all times.
"No, there isn't a radical left all around us who want us dead. All those posts celebrating Charlie's death were just, uh, Israeli bots. This is all just a distraction from the Epstein Files. We actually can work with the Left to oppose Israel."
This is the kind of stuff Russian peasants would say about the Bolsheviks in late 1916.
Older than the Incas
Older than the Aztecs
Older than the Maori in NZ
Older than the Zulu in SA
Older than the Lakota
Older than Islam in India
But the English are not officially considered "native" to England.
He did work within the system. They shut down colonial legislatures. He wrote frequently in papers, set up committees of correspondence, was a signer. But the biggest thing that separates Sam Adams from being retarded is that he actually did things, and also his mentality.
“Nil desperandum-Never Despair. That is a motto for you and me. All are not dead; and where there is a spark of patriotick fire, we will rekindle it.” - Sam Adams
He said this when things were fairly bleak. But he constantly worked the situation as it existed in ways that made sense towards an actual solution, and he was absolutely, unquestionably anti-Blackpilling.
American Nowhereville Capital Cities used to be the engineering and innovation centers of the world, taking in bright young farmer boys and churning out world-class professionals.
Then it became illegal to give white men anything but contempt.
lol, comments locked.
Here’s the thing.
There are a lot of things you can learn by reading and using the right tools. You don’t need a degree to get good at something anymore.
Actually, never was needed.
And if you have the time and intellect, you can often surpass them.
@wayofftheres We are the few who keep looking when the Abyss stares back.
No one really wants this, but dammit, if it’s gonna happen we’re gonna win it.
I support Codreanu because I truly believe he was the greatest political figure to exist in the modern era, and I believe he is a Saint. His relics were incorrupt, every canonized Saint who knew him spoke highly of him, and he was martyred for his Faith and love for Romania.
Some have encouraged me to be careful in my support of him due to the controversies around him. I see that as complete cowardice, as the controversies are blatant slander. I will not disavow because to do so would be to bend to communist lies and to disrespect a holy man. The movement tailspinned after his death, and I have never expressed support for the post-CZC Iron Guard. Codreanu himself expressed some regret when facing his death, so not everything in his movement was flawless and I do not condone violence that is not self defense in nature. But I will never disavow him as a person. I aspire to help get him canonized before I leave this earth.
let me make sure i’m understanding this correctly
the supreme court is refunding all tariff money back to corporations.
the same corporations that didn’t pay a single cent of those tariffs to begin with.
they passed every dollar directly to you through higher prices on everything you buy
you went to the store and paid more for groceries. you paid more for clothes. for car parts. for literally everything.
that money came out of YOUR pocket not theirs
and now the refund goes to THEM?
the corporations who used the tariffs as an excuse to raise prices even higher than the tariff itself and pocket the difference
the american people funded the tariffs.
the corporations profited off the tariffs.
and now the corporations get a refund on money they never spent in the first place
and nobody in washington thinks the people who actually paid should get the money back.
not a single person has even suggested it
guess we are never getting our DOGE checks either
this country does not work for you.
it works for them. it’s a joke
and they’re not even pretending anymore