It's not meant to be funny. It's meant to directly attack who you are at the very core of your being.
The intent is to utterly demoralize you, and inspire those you bully.
If it can't demoralize you because you have no shame, then it steels the hearts of others to stand up to you in a very public way.
Creating a pariah out of Greg Bagwell.
We aim to correct your behavior, or turn you into an outcast.
I am not interested in bantering with you.
I am interested in destroying the way you view the world, because it is harmful to my world, and everyone I care about inside of it.
DIVORCE COURT
"Your honor, I have never even met the woman my wife alleges I had an affair with."
"McDonald's AI ordering system identified you two via facial recognition at a Bangor drive through. You ordered three Big Macs, a 20 piece McNugget, an XL Coke and 6 hot apple pies. She had the 4 piece McNugget Happy Meal with the Hamburglar toy."
"Well, there was that one time, but I was just giving her a lift."
"Don't you have to be 14 or under to buy a Happy Meal, Mr. Platner?"
"Do you wanna see my tattoo?"
It’s different in other states, but looks like in California it’s not that the city so much removes graffiti. YOU are supposed to do that yourself 🫤
From Grok:
Yes, many cities in California have ordinances that hold businesses and homeowners responsible for removing graffiti from their private property, with fines or other penalties for non-compliance. 
These rules treat persistent graffiti as a public nuisance or blight, aiming to keep neighborhoods clean and deter further vandalism. Property owners typically get a notice with a deadline to remove it (often 48 hours to 30 days, depending on the city and whether it’s gang-related). Failure to comply can lead to administrative citations, fines, abatement costs (where the city removes it and bills the owner), liens on the property, or other enforcement actions. 
Why do all of the people talking about the “Epstein Elite” conveniently leave out names like Sergei Belyakov, Oleg Deripaska, Lord Peter Mandelson, Vitaly Churkin, Raafat Al-Sabbagh, Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem, Hamad bin Jassim Al Thani, and Jabor Al Thani…
Anyone who has really dug into the available files knows where they actually point.
The leftist, Islamist, and globalist elites were highly represented as not only clients, but also close social ties.
I enjoy the truth, so let’s start talking about it truthfully.
Yes, the “residual” was proudly tattooed. Until the Na zi reprobate wanted to run for the Senate. Anytime a Demonrat calls out a conservative thinker. You automatically know that the Demonrats are, at the very least, hypocritical, power mongers who don’t give a rats ass about duh democracy - people are merely pests in their pathways to extraordinary resources, money, power and ambitions.
Hmmm 🤔, this reminds me of General Patton. He didn’t like the Russians and wanted to push them back through Poland. If I remember correctly. Eisenhower was more the diplomatic politician. Thus, East and West Germany. And all the fallout.
Thinking President Trump is trying, for now, for an economic stranglehold. Bessent is the best. Time is on his side, for now. If you think President Trump trusts the rulers of Iran, whoever that may be. No. IMO.
Am not in favor of supplying arms to Iranian people who, more likely have never held a gun. That, and previous arming that was turned against US. Think Afghanistan.
Right now the US is strategically strangling Iran. It’s good. For now.
@elonmusk Along with the losses in CA voting; the waste, fraud, corruption and abuse. It’s staggeringly obviously evil. An abomination. Trust evaporated That’s damaging, but not going to give up 🚀🚀. Never give up.
Was looking for a chart, which I think would be helpful to my post. It showed the number of people in Congress, over the past years, since the wars; Iraq, Afghanistan, even Vietnam. Who actually were Active Duty. Downward slide to say the least.
Basically no one in Congress, except for a few, if you can find them, have actually Actively served our Republic. To me that’s sad.
Wish I could find that chart. Think that is sorely lacking in our representation in Congress. Boots on the ground. Leadership. Instead credentials are the primary criteria. Not the I want war, but we have been at war. People who have leadership experience should have more representation in Congress. . 🤔🫤
@GBNT1952 “You don’t bring in a former Joint Chief to change the organizations he spent more time in the upper echelons of than he did in the trenches”
Right there, right then I knew who you were referring to.
Excellent choice of words in your post.