@0xfoobar, what’s the latest on the @clustersxyz project? There haven’t been any tweets or signs of activity on X since November 2025. Is the project still active? Are there plans to develop it further?
It seems your focus has shifted almost entirely to @CircuitAI. Even though Clusters was backed by such strong funds as Electric Capital, Variant, Arrington Capital, and others. Or will their stakes also be diluted in the new project that you’ve shifted your focus to?
@fleek@base@kucoincom@Gate @bitgetglobal @MEXC_Official @CoinList@aeroxyz Look, the team are using bots to spam it in the comments, to hide people's messages about how they get scammed by the team!
Coinlist closed comments because of the same situation - investors on coinlist just get scammed! Tokens are not withdrawing, the price is dumped as hell!
@fleek@base@kucoincom@Gate @bitgetglobal @MEXC_Official @CoinList@aeroxyz Scammers! Tier 3-4 exchanges, no market maker, you don't even add liquidity to Aerodrome exchange!
Total scam for investors!
Stay away from this product!
I almost got hacked just now by an investor imposter Zoom scam 👾
TLDR: Beware of Zoom links and investors asking to catch up + resist social pressures. Never download weird updates
- Be me
- VC friend I know well msgs me on TG asking to catch up
- Sends me real Calendly link so I book a time
- 2 mins before call asks me to hop on a Zoom link, saying the firm's partners are there
- At this point I sense red flag #1 so I do a few checks
- This friend did join a new VC firm recently and the Zoom link name matches the firm
- I plug the link into GPT and it says it looks ok but be wary
- I click the link and it strangely doesn't open the Zoom app, instead it only opens a web version of Zoom which looks diff from normal Zoom browser exp
- I try to enter the meeting using the meeting id + pw in the link via the Zoom app instead
- ID + pw don't work. Red flag #2
- I ask friend on TG for pw, she insists this is web version of Zoom and I should just join via browser
- I probably should have stopped here (I'm stupid I know) but I reopen the link warily and reject all camera and mic permissions as a precaution. I see three people in the meeting room talking (not sure if real or pre-recorded)
- I can see but not hear them. Zoom browser now asks to download SDK to update for audio to work. SUPER RED FLAG
- This was the last straw and I close the window and text her a Google Meet link instead, asking to meet there
- Friend tries to peer pressure me into using the Zoom link instead of the Google link saying "partners are here already"
- I insist on using Google Meet citing recent attacks. My thinking here is if they're a serious crypto VC, they would come over to Google Meet
- Next thing I know: TG chat deleted. Scammer disappears
So far seems like I'm ok but will run some checks to be extra sure. But damn, that was a close call. If I were fundraising and trying to please investors this may have worked, but thankfully I was clearheaded today
Be careful out there everyone
Always. Be. On. Guard. In. Crypto.
The Avalanche Card is here. Crypto-friendly spending, anywhere Visa is accepted.
Waitlist sign up, terms & conditions, and all card details ⬇️ https://t.co/JGMmu5p2l9
👩⚖️ Scroll. The Wrong Turn
Recently the @Scroll_ZKP team announced details of airdrop https://t.co/2UeURjK1HX. And I think it's not a fair giveaway without even seeing the details. I'll try to justify my opinion below and would be happy if @sandypeng and @yezhang1998 reply how they see the situation.
1) Ordinary users have been raising the TVL project https://t.co/8yKqCx2ebX for a year, mintering endless Scroll Canvas badges, spending money on commissions online. I repeat for a whole year. And the project allocates 7% of the issue for them. At the same time there is an announcement of Launchpool on Binance, where 5.5% is allocated in just 2 days. What is this? Are the project's own users less of a priority than Binance users? It would be fair to reduce the share for Binance and increase the share on airdrop 1. A year and two days is a big difference. 7% and 5.5% agree not that significant.... It's understandable that it will be forgotten over time, as with many drops. But in the perspective of 6-12 months it will be in the memory of retail and will have a negative impact on the token.
2) The idea of announcing an open snapshot date of 19 Oct 2024 looks really bad. Who is it for. So that big capital can bring in a large amount of funds in the remaining 11 days and farm all the brands, completely shifting the entire brand distribution? That's exactly what it looks like! Usually a project rewards early users over late users. And in this case, it rewards the large wallet who will start liquidity, get a large drop, and withdraw liquidity in less than 2 weeks. This is the end of all benefits for the project from such a user.
We know what such whales usually do with drops. Let me remind you, according to @ArkhamIntel analytics, Justin Sun received $8.75M from Eigenlayer https://t.co/gwJBkP5ufr. And sold over 2M tokens in the first 24 hours after receiving the airdrop.
If other sources are to be believed, his airdrop was even larger (5.75M $EIGEN tokens according to exchange data https://t.co/xSSeKqExlJ) and the sale brought in $21.66M and raised questions about its potential impact on $EIGEN market trajectory.
3) Special attention should be paid to the one-sided change of vesting for early investors, who, as far as I know, learnt about it also from the public announcement (or is it not so?) and ran to the OTC to dump their allocations, because they were initially given other terms. It's no secret that there were OTC deals on the market not so long ago, where early seed investors transferred their tokens to new owners, and as far as I know it happened under the supervision of the #Scroll team. The vesting spocks in those deals were better than they turned out to be in the end. As a result, those investors who re-bought the rights are disappointed. So are those investors who didn't get out in time and learned of the vesting changes from the public announcement.
As a result, the other day I saw an offer to sell $3M worth of $SCR tokens on the OTC market in one transaction, not counting others. This is a prime example of what I'm talking about above. Investors are not happy! There will be problems with retail, investors are already in trouble. And how will the project move forward, alone? That looks controversial and troubling, too.
𝐓𝐨𝐝𝐚𝐲, 𝐓𝐎𝐍 𝐒𝐨𝐜𝐢𝐞𝐭𝐲 𝐥𝐚𝐮𝐧𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐬 𝐚 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐬𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐢𝐭𝐬 𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐮𝐫𝐠𝐞 𝐅𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐭𝐨 #FREEDUROV.
An Open Letter Mini App in Telegram.
Anyone who values privacy and freedom of speech should sign this letter to French authorities. We hope to reach hundreds of millions of signatures.
We urge the French authorities to:
1️⃣ Free Mr. Pavel Durov from detention.
2️⃣ Allow Telegram to protect the freedom of expression and right to private life for its users.
The #DigitalResistance is now. #FREEDUROV.
🆓 𝐀𝐬 𝐚𝐥𝐰𝐚𝐲𝐬, 𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 #FREEDUROV, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐧𝐨𝐰 𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐎𝐩𝐞𝐧 𝐋𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐢𝐧 𝐓𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐦: https://t.co/GRbGgGA8d8
🎁 Get a free subscription on us!
Open your EtherDrops bot in Telegram https://t.co/OD10aQTjx4 and send /gift
Follow the guide to complete three easy steps and receive your freebie within 72 hours!
On-chain monitoring in Telegram has never been easier with #etherdrops_bot 🚀
#okx#urgent
ALL @okx EXCHANGE USERS ARE AT RISK
Since 2019, I have been a partner of the OKX exchange, recommended it to you and actively used it myself.
Until today, it worked honestly and stably.
But today, I regret to admit that the exchange policy and all the prerequisites that I personally encountered force me to call on my community and at least users from the CIS countries:
- urgently withdraw all funds from the OKX exchange
- stop using the exchange for an indefinite period
Otherwise, users from the CIS risk facing sudden blocking of their accounts, freezing of funds and loss of any assets.
The fact is that the policy of the OKX exchange and personally the head of the @star_okx exchange has suddenly changed to a radical one in relation to users from the CIS since May 2024.
My account has been blocked, as well as the referral base accumulated over many years. Influencers recommending the OKX exchange may incur not only financial but also reputational risks.
Similar episodes have been confirmed among my influencer friends. The account is blocked, the withdrawal of funds that are in debt is limited. Only after my dialogue with the team was it possible to force the exchange to release these funds. But I realize that my strength and influence on the exchange team will not be enough in the event of mass cases.
❗️Everyone is at risk, without exception. Both ordinary users and influencers/partners.
At the moment, I am in dialogue with the founder of the OKX exchange and so far I am honestly trying to understand the situation, which greatly alarms even me, a long-term partner.
I will return with a detailed report on the situation soon.
‼️I ask opinion leaders to spread this notice and protect members of their communities from risks.
Airdrop failure from @zkSync or where is the decentralization?
Blockchain is a transparent territory. Traces remain, even if someone leaves an airstream for maneuvering.
The @zksync team has made a sensation in the crypto community with the most opaque distribution possible. Some points are simply absurd.
@gluk64@frogmonkee@Ozhar@Yogi13031997@stonecoldpat0@TrustlessState@Caneleo55@heycape_@0x_Lens@gluk64
@TheZKNatiou
#zksyncscam
1) 13,000 wallets with 0 tx in the zkSync network received an allocation. And what use are these users to the project if they haven't even come in contact with it? https://t.co/T7Tigfx0FX
🎉 Get your hands on a limited edition #USDC hardware wallet for FREE! 🛡️
🎁 Swap 35 USDC to redeem!
🚀 Enjoy exclusive privileges!
🗓️ 24th-30th Jan 10 AM UTC 2024
DL to join📱 https://t.co/fBj8jI9ied
Full details👇
https://t.co/wZ7y1dsU3w
#SafePal#CryptoSecurity#Giveaway
@CoinList is experimenting with tokensale formats. In the @MOCAFoundation sale, there is an option for Whales who can get a guaranteed distribution if they deposit $100,000 or more. But I have a question, in case of account banning and inability to withdraw funds just because your @CoinListSupport doesn't double check documents and doesn't respond for months, will these users also have to run after you for months to get their money back? Account ban can come trivially if you're travelling the world and log into a sale from a different IP.
It's commendable that Coinlist is experimenting with formats, changing. But it is very bad that over the years of existence nothing has been done in terms of improving user support. Your users go complain anywhere, to me in chat rooms, in comments under videos, because they know that you as a platform don't care about them. And that's sad.
@rargulati We've already talked to you about this and you agreed that the user should be able to get their money back anyway, even if it means closing their account. Solve this problem at last! Assigning a user's deposit to yourself is how legitimate it is... FTX already paid for it. I hope you are smarter than that!