@PonderHart@Dracones24601@MJKelleyII Yes, it does - that’s what Catholics don’t understand. But none of that changes the fact that what you originally cited doesn’t relate directly to baptism. Take the L fool- you are unteachable and unrepentant.
@JoReKeo@MJKelleyII And if you will look, I specifically mentioned the right dividing of the word. That’s how you know if the person is a demon or not. Catholic doctrine is based on a false gospel. That’s how you know it’s demonic.
@Cee10William@moose_con@sola_chad Ha ha ha ha ha - you won’t refuse it because you can’t. That’s what all you Catholics do when faced with reality, you tuck your tail and run.
@PonderHart@Dracones24601@MJKelleyII If you will read what I wrote, those are not the original text that you cited. Yes, it’s clear what Paul thought about baptism, but once again they are not related to the original verses you cited.
@Catholic_Haze We don’t need 2 foundations. The Apostles are Prophets were the foundation with Christ as the chief cornerstone.
If you have to build upon the foundation withe the pope and bishops, then that’s a second foundation.
@Cee10William@moose_con@sola_chad No, it’s not 2000 years old. It never existed until formalized in the 1500s. Certainly none of the apostles belong to any Roman Catholic Church.