@WSJopinion@RahmEmanuel This is a veiled effort to push the “corrupt administration” narrative as a thoughtful analysis. Emmanuel is part of the Dem machine and tries to subtly push “corruption” as fact to justify Dem lawfare & intimidate conservatives. We see through it. Repitition doesn’t equal truth.
There's actually a specific reason for this.
The color revolution operators talk about "transpartisanship" all the time. You CANNOT succeed in a coup if you're perceived as supporting only one party.
Hegseth -> impeached by a Republican House, then removed by a Democratic Senate fulfills this requirement exactly.
That's why they keep emphasizing Massie's party label and that Massie is a Republican. They'll drive this talking point to the ground.
I am a professor at the @UofCalifornia. I am appalled by the conduct of one of its Regents, Scott Galloway, appointed in August by Governor Newsom.
@profgalloway is one of only 26 voting Regents entrusted with governing a university system serving hundreds of thousands of students & employing tens of thousands of faculty & staff.
Twice, first on a live Pivot episode featuring Hillary Clinton & on Prof G with Fareed Zakaria, Galloway called Elon Musk a “traitor to the West.”
He invoked Julius & Ethel Rosenberg, who were executed for espionage, and declared that Musk should be held to the same standards.
He didn’t explicitly demand Musk’s execution. But invoking the deaths of two convicted spies while calling an American citizen a traitor makes the implication hard to miss.
Musk has not been convicted of treason. Indeed, “treason against the West” isn’t even an actual crime.
Now imagine UCLA alumnus @BenShapiro, appointed a UC Regent, saying the same about George Soros.
Would the Governor defend his right to serve? Would Regent leadership shrug and call it provocative commentary? Or would there be demands for resignation?
But there’s something worse here than another of Scott’s trademark podcast rants.
He sits on the Regents’ Academic & Student Affairs Committee.
The committee’s charter says it oversees student conduct, faculty conduct, academic personnel, & campus climate, among other responsibilities.
This is not some honorary title.
The Board sets university policy, controls institutional budgets, & appoints senior university leadership.
You can unsubscribe from a podcast.
A student who finds Scott’s comments morally repugnant can’t unsub from the Regents.
UC bylaws require Regents to serve the public trust with a “high degree of ethics and candor,” including as private citizens.
Professors owe students intellectual integrity. Regents bear an even greater duty: they govern institutions that teach it.
Yet a Regent serving on the committee responsible for student & faculty conduct invokes executions while labeling a fellow citizen a traitor.
What does that say to our students?
That intellectual restraint is expected of the governed but optional for those who govern?
That standards of conduct depend on whether the target of your rhetoric is politically fashionable to despise, as long as the audience applauds?
This isn’t about defending @ElonMusk. He needs no defense from me.
Nor is it about silencing Scott. As if that were possible. He’s free to express his opinions, however reckless they may be.
But freedom of speech is not freedom from accountability, and holding a university office of public trust is not an entitlement.
There is an enormous moral chasm between exercising your right to speak recklessly and demonstrating the judgment required of one of the 26 people who govern our great public university.
The UC Board of Regents isnt a podcast sponsors can boycott. It’s a public trust.
One final irony. At @NYUStern, Galloway teaches Brand Strategy, including a session on crisis management.
His own prescription for leadership in a crisis is unequivocal: acknowledge the problem, have leadership take responsibility, and “overcorrect.”
He’s praised the departure of corporate leaders as evidence of effective crisis management.
Now Galloway himself sits on the UC Board of Regents.
Will he hold himself to the standards he teaches, or does accountability apply only to other people’s institutions?
Professor lecture thyself!
I believe Scott Galloway should seriously consider whether his continued service on the Board of Regents is consistent with the ethical standards and responsibilities of that office, or whether he should resign.
I welcome the opportunity to discuss these issues with Galloway directly, including what standards we should expect of those entrusted with governing the world’s best university.
Scott, you have an open invitation to join me on @Into_Impossible for an honest conversation.
@Englishremnant This is extremely important and does not get spoken about enough. The old communist regimes did the exact same type of language subversion. Free speech becoming 'harm' has become a particularly effective tactic they have used to bully and silence others.
The Weaponisation of Language
One of the most effective tactics of the modern left has been the corruption of language itself. Words that once had clear meaning have been twisted beyond recognition - redefined to suit their agenda and silence dissent.
They call censorship “safety.”
They call propaganda “education.”
They call perversion “pride.”
They call cowardice “tolerance.”
They call patriotism “hate.”
Through manipulation of words, they’ve managed to reshape moral reality. By controlling the language, they control what people are allowed to think. Change the definition, and you change the debate.
When “man” and “woman” become “identities,” when truth becomes “offensive,” and when disagreement is rebranded as “violence,” reason itself is under attack.
It’s not ignorance - it’s strategy. Because when the meaning of words collapses, truth becomes whatever they say it is. And that’s exactly how control begins.
Language built our civilisation. The twisting of it will destroy it - unless we start speaking plainly again.
“When words lose their meaning, people lose their freedom.” - Confucius
I’m so sick of seeing people across social media claim Abdul El-Sayed is only getting heat “because he’s a Muslim man.”
That’s not the reason. Other Muslims have been elected to office without this reaction. Repeating it just makes you look stupid.
Here are the actual problems:
1- In 2012 he signed a letter to Mohamed Morsi (the Muslim Brotherhood president of Egypt) supporting his power grab and calling on him to “purge the media and the police as quickly as possible.”
2- His biological mother, Fatten Elkomy, worked for the Islamic American Relief Agency (IARA), which the U.S. Treasury designated for supporting terrorism. His half-sister has publicly said their mother was active in the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt in the 1970s.
3- His half-sister Eman Abdelhadi posted on social media about their mother’s Muslim Brotherhood activism and expressed support for family members backing the Brotherhood in Egypt.
4- He refused to condemn the IRGC when directly asked by an Iranian-American student whose family was targeted by them. Leaked audio also shows he deliberately stayed silent on Khamenei’s death because “there are a lot of people in Dearborn who are sad,” prioritizing his base over basic condemnation of a terrorist regime.
5- His father, Mohamed El-Sayed, sits on the board of Life for Relief and Development, a Michigan-based Islamic charity that paid a $780,000 settlement to the U.S. Treasury for violating sanctions by transferring money into Saddam Hussein’s Iraq. The group has also faced raids and scrutiny over alleged ties to terror-linked networks.
These are documented facts.
@RepAnalilia Lies. Abolish “sanctuary” policy which releases criminal illegal aliens into communities, forcing ICE ops there. Illegal aliens do not have constitutional rights.
Multiple med/pre-med students at the University of Michigan were caught planning to poison future patients if they weren't "aligned with Palestine" while also planning to kill fellow students and teachers.
U of M refused to condemn their actions.
🚨 THE ECONOMIC BOOM THEY REFUSED TO TELL YOU ABOUT JUST EXPLODED INTO VIEW 🚨
While the entire country was screaming about races, polls, and midterm chaos… an absolute economic rocket was launching right under our noses. And almost NO ONE noticed.
Victor Davis Hanson just laid out the numbers that should have every American furious about the messaging failure:
🔥 165,000 NEW JOBS just dropped — they were projecting a pathetic 45,000 a month ago
🔥 Poverty rate crashed to an ALL-TIME LOW of 10.5%
🔥 Per capita family income hit a brand new RECORD of $87,000
🔥 GDP just revised UP to 3.4%… Atlanta Fed now says it could hit 5% by year-end
We are in the middle of a BOOM. And the only thing louder than the economy is the political fighting drowning it out.
Now compare that to 2022 when the red wave vanished:
📈 Stock market is a staggering 20,000 points HIGHER than when Biden “stopped the red wave”
📈 Family income is $14,000 higher than just four years ago
📉 Inflation was a brutal 9.1% record high in 2022… now nowhere near that
⛽ Gas on Election Day 2022 was $3.95–$4.05… today it’s $4.06 — basically identical
In 2022 the economy was a wreck, inflation was three times worse, GDP was weaker, people were furious… yet the political outcome was completely different.
So what changed?
The numbers got better. The messaging got worse. And the country was too busy fighting to notice the boom happening right in front of them.
This is the biggest missed opportunity heading into the midterms. The data was there the entire time.
Who was paying attention? 👀
(Share this before it gets buried.) 🔥📈💸