Ro Khanna massively embarrassed himself today. Instead of discussing policy, he accused me of anti-Chinese racism.
My wife is Chinese. My 4 children are half Chinese.
What’s Ro Khanna? 100% clown.
In 2024 George Conway said that Trump was most likely going to prison for the rest of his life.
After Trump won Conway cried because he blew a million dollars on Biden’s campaign.
Now he just got embarrassed in his primary. That’s quite a run George!
THE MAN WHO WANTS TO BAN CONGRESSIONAL TRADING IS CONGRESS'S BIGGEST TRADER.
Elon Musk called Representative Ro Khanna "Ro the Robber" and said he "should be in prison." A 239-page ethics complaint filed in May 2026 shows why.
Khanna sits on the House Armed Services Committee and chairs the China Select Committee. His household has made 37,238 stock trades.
99.997% of those trades were placed in the name of his wife or dependent child, not Khanna himself. His official disclosure forms list no blind trust, no separately managed account, and no third-party broker.
That means there is no paperwork backing the claim that he doesn't know what his family is trading.
His net worth has grown from $45 million when he entered Congress in 2017 to an estimated $232.7 million today.
A 2022 New York Times investigation already found 149 potential conflicts of interest tied to his trades, the most of any lawmaker in that report.
The new complaint adds specific timing patterns that suggest more than coincidence.
On defense stocks:
His household bought shares in Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrop Grumman, and Raytheon right before NDAA defense bills passed, including 7 buys 12 days before the 2018 bill.
All 13 of these bills ultimately passed into law. Khanna voted NO on 12 of those 13 votes publicly, even though the NDAA is one of the most reliably passing bills in Congress every year.
The complaint argues this let him take a popular anti spending stance with voters while his committee seat gave his family advance insight into contracts that were going to move forward regardless of his vote.
On 9 separate days, Palantir won a federal contract the same day Khanna's household bought Palantir stock, including a $19 million Air Force contract on May 10, 2022, the same day his child's account made 6 separate Palantir trades, before that contract was public knowledge.
On healthcare:
1,244 pharmaceutical trades happened within 14 days of CMS pricing decisions, and 4,595 happened within 14 days of FDA advisory meetings.
Both rank number 1 of 66 House members.
On August 2, 2024, his household made 286 trades in a single day, including 4 drug companies that later appeared on a confidential government price list published 13 days after, a list that was not public on the day of the trades.
On Nvidia:
In 2024, Khanna's family donated 10,076 Nvidia shares, worth $1.67 million at the time, to a family foundation.
That same year, Khanna voted no on a chips bill and yes on four China policy bills, while chairing the exact committee that decides how much access China gets to American AI chips, a decision that directly moves Nvidia's stock price.
624 trades were filed late, past the legally required 45-day window.
One was 358 days late. The 45-day rule exists specifically so the public can see a trade while it still matters, while a bill is still being debated or a decision is still pending.
Filing late defeats that entire purpose.
186 trades happened on the same day the company filed an SEC Form 8-K, more than any other House member and over 4 times the next closest one.
On donations:
5 former federal officials who became lobbyists for companies Khanna's committees oversee gave money to his campaign.
One of them, a former defense official now lobbying for Boeing, allegedly certified on a federal disclosure form that he made no political donations during the same period he donated to Khanna.
Total estimate: $61 million in household profits, including $28 million more than a simple index fund would have earned.
Khanna has publicly co-sponsored a bill to ban members of Congress from trading individual stocks.
His own household just set the modern record for it.
Here's what @DOGE found the USAID money was being spent on:
• $4.8 million to Ukraine’s public affairs office in Kyiv to fund social media influencers.
• $2.1 million to Paraguay to “enhance” their border security.
• Ukrainian women-led designers to fly to the Paris Fashion Show.
• $2 million on transgender surgeries, hormone therapy, and gender-affirming care in Guatemala.
• $3 million to promote “girl-centric climate action” in Brazil.
• $25,000 for a transgender opera in Colombia.
• $32,000 in Peru for a comic book featuring a “Trans hero” to tackle social and mental health issues.
• $20,000 for a DEI-promoting drag theater show in Ecuador.
• $20 million for a new Sesame Street show in Iraq.
• $6 million to boost “sustainable tourism” in Egypt—plus $50 million for Tunisia’s tourism.
• $87.9 million to help Afghans “farm”—which just happened to include poppy fields.
• $70,000 for a live musical event promoting Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility in Ireland.
• Over $54 million funneled to EcoHealth Alliance—the group linked to the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the likely origins of COVID.
• $15 million to Taliban-controlled Afghanistan for oral contraceptives and condoms.
Ruben Gallego funneled cash from a joint campaign account with Eric Swalwell to take his wife Sydney to the 2023 Super Bowl in Arizona.
These people are SICK!
🚨 HOLY SMOKES.
A heated exchange broke out over the SAVE America Act after someone argued that stricter voter ID or proof-of-citizenship rules would disproportionately impact minority voters.
A woman in the discussion pushed back hard, calling it offensive to suggest minorities aren’t capable of obtaining basic documents like a birth certificate or ID.
Her point was simple:
“If I need my birth certificate, I can get it. Online or by asking.”
That moment captures the core tension in this debate.
Supporters of the SAVE Act argue it’s common sense and that implying minorities can’t navigate basic documentation is patronizing.
Opponents argue that systemic barriers — cost, access, bureaucratic delays — can still create uneven burdens, even if individuals are fully capable.
The disagreement isn’t about intelligence.
It’s about access and impact.
Election policy debates hit deep because they touch identity, trust, and fairness all at once.
And when those arguments happen face-to-face, the tone can shift quickly. 🇺🇸
Ro Khanna: "It's not an issue that you have undocumented people in mass numbers voting."
Bartiromo: "Elections have been lost by 1,000 votes...there shouldn't be any illegals voting!