@WKCosmo No it doesnt you bumbling moron. It depends on the P time algorithm performs practically. Why are so many of these buffoonish losers out here peddling slop and trash
@prerat It does not have to be constructive not does one drop out of the sky. Stupid nonsense. If that were true we could just assume P=NP and get the algo. Do people believe this moron?
@Pranto39@Ionkosm The multipliers are relative ti their $20 subscriptions. You clearly arent smart enough to know what a quantity discount is, what a bozo
@Ayegill@prerat For practical purposes is pretty easy to define. Time could be in computation time relative to human lifespan. Space could be in the amount of RAM in the largest supercomputer, etc. It is too easy to make precise after choosing the arbitrary measuring sticks
@beenwrekt You lost the plot buddy. Making typical dime a dozen Nostradomus speculations, when literally nothing is known about minimizing the constants or complexity bounds. Circuit lower bounds are a "mathematical graveyard" according to the top models. You are not on solid ground.
@v12sec@zellic_io We need to call on Intel and AMD to open source the microcode and architectural details so we dont have to model atop proprietary code and "side channels" which are by definition due to approximations and assumptions that are unavoidable here. Open up x86 processors!
@tritlo These stupid Nostradomuses are a dime a dozen. They don't know what they dont know and post nothing but slop and speculation and trash. Constants in complexity are optimizable. Noone knows the atoms in the universe. Heaping mounds of trash. Dont eat it.
@kartographien No complexity theory is theory it does not have to be practical at all. The practical fruits squeezed from theory results can take time and are a new result. Why are so many fools on here unable to comprehend theory vs practical. A dime a dozen I swear total bozos
@moarbugs Anyone could pick a trivially solvable by AI problem that you are not knowledgeable enough to realize it is trivially solvable by AI as AI is quite sophisticated. They already know the technique to guide AI, and just dont tell you. To me that is a bizarre subjective filter
@GeekCatX There are many harnesses besides codex to burn these tokens. Codex is local software so you can patch it to work anyway if you are persistent.
@BooleanAnalysis Just open a new chat and tell it to continue from there. Im quite sure it has a tool that let's it reread it as you start your new line on inquiry. Im thrilled to see this is really giving ideas about #P as counting solutions is very interesting.
@DimitrisPapail Why do we get ignorant opinions from uneducated people who dont know the difference between theoretical and practical. These types are a dime a dozen these days.
@thsottiaux@rezoundous If Terra replaced Sol, I would not feel it as a loss but as it is, doing intensive research and Lean formalizing where gaps are found and thinking is needed, I dont quite see it. The current offering is excellent, very sad to lose it. At the end of the day, a business decision
@Nil053 Ignore the haters. Those that d9 not understand the value in theoretical work do not have minds developed enough to be worth anyone's time. The Big O Speedrun already accomplished a great deal with famous complexity theorists like Scott Aaronson publicly acknowledging it.
@joeintheory Complexity theory is a notoriously hard field, that is young and with few landmarks results. Stroke your ego a bit more buddy. But dont call it thinking. Call it being an arrogant dastardly miserly bastard, tell it like it us.