its different categories about self-expression. I can see myself fitting into the achievers and makers categories, but I wonder what I would actually be put into. What category/ies do you think you would be put into with the VALS framework? #UWJ201 #306
#UWJ201 #306 In lecture today, we learned about PRIZM and VALS, which are tools for drawing insights out of demographics, geographics, and psychographics. We also learned that they are reductionist but can be useful. I am curious to know how accurate the VALS framework is with
@LucySpeers5#UWJ201 #306 I don't know what it says about me as a consumer, but I hate when brands develop "online personalities," as you put it. They always try to appeal to younger generations, but it comes off as desperate to me and never results in me wanting to buy from the brand.
@adler_maddy#UWJ201 #306 I am certainly not the first to say this, but probably Instagram. This is the social media platform I use the most and enjoy the most, so that would explain why. Their ads can also be very specific.
#306 #UWJ201 Because the central route of the ELM tends to last longer and be stronger than the peripheral route, advertisers would be incentivized by promoting more central route-taking. How can advertisers do this? Or is it more in the hands of the consumers?
@allisonlgardner#UWJ201 #306 As was discussed near the end of the lecture, the general consensus is that the peripheral route is more common when using social media, which I completely agree with. I use social media often, so I feel that I am more persuaded by the peripheral route.
@sophiefriedberg#UWJ201 #306 When we first discussed this, I was a bit lost because I also felt that the lines could be blurred between the two and that persuasion could be argued as a form of manipulation. However, I think a sure sign for manipulation is skewing facts or creating lies.
@maddydoeden#UWJ201 #306 I honestly don't find myself questioning news stories that often. I may be naive for being so trusting of what I read. As for which networks I question more, I can't think of any specific networks, but I certainly question any "news" I see on social media.
@ChenpengWan#UWJ201 #306 I also have trouble maintaining a level of skepticism all the time. With everything we are always reading or consuming, I think it is impossible to expect everyone to doubt all that they take in. I think skepticism is a good tool, but we cannot utilize it always.
#UWJ201 #306 Of the four models of journalism in the 21st century that were discussed during the lecture, which do you feel is the most prevalent today and why? Because of how fast-paced the news is today, I would say journalism of assertion, but verification is also possible.
@GeffersSamuel @MaiaGiles5#UWJ201 #306 This is almost exactly what I was going to say. I would also argue it can be a sort of validation for some folks that reinforce their political leaning or views as "better", as political discussions sometimes unfortunately become more of a competition.
@CaseyAugust2#UWJ201 #306 I think the 4 steps would always be beneficial and efficient towards building trust no matter the media type or demographic. Everyone appreciates feeling included and valued for their thoughts and opinions, so I especially cannot see the 2nd step having zero effect.
#UWJ201 #306 In the ECAD reading with recommendations for coverage surrounding the 2020 presidential election, many guidelines (such as denying a platform to those with unfounded claims) were listed. Which of these do you feel are most important for election coverage in general?
#UWJ201 #306 During lecture today, Professor Wagner discussed editorial sections of newspapers and how they can lead to more belief in media bias. Do you feel these commentary sections are doing more good than bad? Is this increased belief in media bias worth it?
@amandamilleruw#UWJ201 #306 On the whole, I don't think our reliance on social media has drastically changed these primary functions. However, I think the nature of social media has prioritized entertaining over informing in some situations to keep the attention of viewers.
@KaitlynRock2#UWJ201 #306 According to PEW, the circulation of print during the weekdays and Sundays has been decreasing since the 1990s. As we become more reliant on social media and online news, I do believe print media will eventually become obsolete. TV news may last longer, however.
#UWJ201 #306 The Vox article seems to cover the insurrection thematically and balances anecdotes with research, giving voice to those involved in BLM protests over elites, so it follows the advice from McLeod. Do you feel this is a good example of protest coverage?
@maddydoeden#UWJ201 #306 In my opinion, the most important reason to have a diverse media diet is the resulting objective understanding of world events. Consuming news from one outlet or source will lead to possibly skewed, subjective views and limited perspectives.
@AlisonStecker#UWJ201 #306 After reading McLeod's article, I find the elite framing the most problematic. With the elite framing, there is a lack of empathy and serious regard for the protestors and their valid struggles. It shifts the narrative from the protestors to those already in power.
#UWJ201 #306 During lecture today, we learned about the consequences of HME, some being lowered political efficacy and more aggression. Have you noticed any possible changes in your behavior? I participate in more corrective action and higher political participation.