@hellothisisivan Thank you. The irritation of seeing a snake-like queue to the bar is nearly as bad as sitting near people watching videos on their phone without earbuds or having a video call with their mate that cannot wait.
@ProfHall1955@malcolm_reavell@litewhisperer@homebuynowuk I don't think anyone here mentioned a solvency risk for the BoE. But a growing negative equity position would be eventually be dealt with, through an recapitalisation from the Treasury. This discussion is on the accounting and monetary effects of cancelling over Β£800bn of gilts.
@malcolm_reavell@litewhisperer@homebuynowuk The Bank can definitely be in negative equity. The question is how much it matters and the effect(s) policy choices to rectify that.
@litewhisperer@malcolm_reavell@homebuynowuk No one mentioned "end of days", but what would the effect be on the value of sterling, business and investor confidence. Fwiw.... With an ageing population, I envisage the Bank holding massive portions of our debt in the coming decades.
@litewhisperer@malcolm_reavell@homebuynowuk So the Bank would be in negative equity, would need recapitalising by Parliament. What effects do you envisage from such a large cancellation of debt, leaving the Bank with nearly a trillion (which it would surpass from paying out interest on reserves) in negative equity?
@malcolm_reavell@homebuynowuk@litewhisperer And that "cash" that the former bondholders now hold is a liability for the BoE, which is matched by the (assets) gilts it now holds. If you simply cancel the debt, then the BoE will have a massive asset/liability mismatch.