@scottiebateman Very nice!
We have occasional visits from C-130s flying nap of the earth about 100 feet above our dwelling (https://t.co/sKXZEwjhaH). Usually, just one aircraft. When close, the structure (pleasantly) reverberates with aircraft noises.
I grew up learning English both written and oral. I encountered few impediments. I was reading fluently by the age of seven because I read many things all the time. I would rather not debate the propriety of using something other than what I, and many others, employed in order to master the English language.
I think you are flogging a dead horse, so to speak. If you foster a replacement for English prose, trot it out for admiration and admonition. I suspect managing one grapheme per lexeme per utterance will be a difficult task, since there are quite a few folks who use English proficiently.
Your "citations" lack vigor and are not your own.
"The English spelling system has 1/2 of all of its words not adhering to the alphabetic one-letter-one-sound principle."
Whose principle is that?
Not at all easy to change. Fails when diphthongs, and other long-standing orthographic usages, are considered.
Unless I misunderstand, you would prefer to alter orthography rather than help folks master the existing gift of the ages.
Also, nepitism is not a word: nepotism is.
How would you spell schism in a way that linked single characters to single sounds?