Genhx

GenHx provides a #PersonalisedMedicine that combines #nutritionalmedicine, #environmental #medicine, #epigenetics and #advanced #nutritional #biochemistry.

[Genhx @GenHxAustralia]

@HalSparks @TonyRobbins @PaulStanleyLive @BrianTracy Pass on the dirty genes. I don't want cancer and depression.

[Genhx @GenHxAustralia]

Lest We Forget.
#AnzacDay #ANZAC #Poppy #LestWeForget

[Genhx @GenHxAustralia]

@GCBrianne @Forbes @23andMe Thank you.

[Genhx @GenHxAustralia]

We are worried because of the incorrect interpretation of these tests. There is so much more info people need to know. Unnecessarily treating a MTHFR SNP can result increased suppression of BRCA, resulting on cancer. https://t.co/h8lOwtCVFG
@stevesalzberg
@Forbes
@23andMe

[Genhx @GenHxAustralia]

Sequencing time! #PCR #genetics

[Genhx @GenHxAustralia]

@GCBrianne More than happy for you to call me out. I like a good discussion. I am really interested in why you think a SNP analayis is superior to whole exome sequencing. I believe you cannot assume anything, when it comes to genetics and the epigenome.

[Genhx @GenHxAustralia]

@GCBrianne Positive selection, again in baboons. Significant since positive selection created the human species.

[Genhx @GenHxAustralia]

@GCBrianne Yes all of which, show positive selection of the gene as a result of environmental change.

[Genhx @GenHxAustralia]

@GCBrianne Yes, association is not causation which is why you can't treat an MTHFR mutation without knowing if you need to.

[Genhx @GenHxAustralia]

@GCBrianne @Forbes @23andMe This gene is likely associated with BRCA as a protective positive selection, due to hyper methylation. Treating it, bypasses natural selection and would likely result in worsening of the condition. https://t.co/dWwvqflnnO

[Genhx @GenHxAustralia]

@GCBrianne @Forbes @23andMe They are in there, just not highlighted. Here is a couple. https://t.co/eV1FSQ0iYy
https://t.co/XkEFfdKFaE
https://t.co/TeA0Yy8TDu
https://t.co/kl5XFyXYFV
https://t.co/V4sr1ZkLNC

[The Scientist @TheScientistLLC]

Scientists call for more comprehensive testing of pesticides. https://t.co/EmgG3a3dW3

[Genhx @GenHxAustralia]

People don't realise that this mutation is protective, quite possibly to protect against a BRCA deletion. @Forbes
@StevenSalzberg1 @nytimes
https://t.co/o1b2KMVX4L

[Genhx @GenHxAustralia]

@nytimes There are many additional things you need to know when interpreting a #BRCA gene result from @23andMe. Often, misinterpretation of this test increases the risk of #breastcancer further, by increasing methylation by treating #MTHFR. #breastcancer
https://t.co/yiYWeLUcoS

[Genhx @GenHxAustralia]

@MyGeneCounsel @sara_altschule @AmbryGenetics @bustle People use @23andMe to discover they have an MTHFR SNP, but by treating it turn the BRCA gene off more, which increases the risk of breast cancer. It's all in the intepretation, but the quality of the test it ia impossible to accurately interpret the results.

[Genhx @GenHxAustralia]

@MyGeneCounsel @sara_altschule @AmbryGenetics @bustle Pointless doing a BRCA gene test, without knowing how that gene is expressed. You need to know your acetylation, methylation and ubiquitination status to determine how protective the BRCA is against excess ESR1.

[Genhx @GenHxAustralia]

@GCBrianne @aliquotthis Exactly.

[Genhx @GenHxAustralia]

@StevenSalzberg1 @nytimes @23andMe Yet practitioners prescribe methylated B's to bypass it without truly knowing the methylation status of patient. Therefore we are encouraging greater evolutionary positive selection of this gene mutation. It's inaccurate, dangerous and unethical.