JES

[JES @GenericJes]

@DawnsMission 40 or 50 years ago smoking was also fine according to the knowledge we had back then.

[JES @GenericJes]

@LocasaleLab No vaccine in history has been found to cause cancer. Cancer is something that develops over years or decades. A vaccine is usually taken once or a few times only, so the reaction would likely be during a transient period unlike with for example a drug that you take every day.

[JES @GenericJes]

@RussianBBAY @harryfisherEMTP @grok Is there such a thing as "shedding"?

[JES @GenericJes]

@harryfisherEMTP @Waltika This is called anecdotal evidence. It means very little because speaking of UFO's, everyone can claim they witnessed seeing them as well. So what?

[JES @GenericJes]

@RichardF1990 @ronnoc_rd @JamieAA_Again It wasn't. This one chart is something a person drew up. In reality flu wasn't completely gone. Am I right? @grok

[JES @GenericJes]

@goingtogetugly @Sunny_Rae1 @hannahspierMD If most published research findings are false, why should we trust his published research findings claiming research findings are false?

[JES @GenericJes]

@stringerbell99 @LiveAncestral Yeah this is such a dumb argument. It's like saying the human body makes fat and therefore people cannot be overweight.

[JES @GenericJes]

@holisticgrenade Data doesn't support your speculation. Infant mortality has reduced massively during the last 60 years and is down from 26 to 5 per 1000 births during this time.

[JES @GenericJes]

@shawnredwood @DrMcFillin Uhm. So why is your wife on drugs then? The church certainly does not force her to take drugs. It's not like drugs come into our mailbox and the government has a camera watching that you take them.

[JES @GenericJes]

@DebiEvansMatron That's fine. Biohacking is the future though and will allow us to live longer.

[JES @GenericJes]

@biohackingdad @ValerieAnne1970 No. Vaccines contain no more aluminum than you get from chocolate or tea. The dosage is what makes the poison. Also most vaccines don't even contain aluminum at all.

[JES @GenericJes]

@aterhov2 @ThomasKatz74509 @JamieAA_Again @grok Wrong at which point? Are you unable to specify what Grok is wrong about and why?

[JES @GenericJes]

@aterhov2 @ThomasKatz74509 @JamieAA_Again @grok Do viruses exist and how has this been verified?

[JES @GenericJes]

@MannicheVibeke Medicine and science isn't settled in political "hearings". This is theater on both sides.

[JES @GenericJes]

@JamieAA_Again Nah. You are a hoax.

[JES @GenericJes]

And no, a disease mechanism is not required as ground zero. There is no disease mechanism necessary to gain the knowledge that a too high blood pressure is bad. You can make that conclusion from data. Same with Alzheimer's. Your take would require the patients to "prove" they have it since there is no objective biomarker.

[JES @GenericJes]

@hannahspierMD Yeah this another lazy take. You are basically shifting the blame on the patient. Find an abnormality? No problem, we can always explain it away by "anxiety" or anything else. Medicine would never have progressed with this kind of attitude.

[JES @GenericJes]

@XnewsOutlet @RobSchneider @X Was it? Last I checked, world population exceeded eight billion in 2022 with over ten billion doses of COVID vaccines given.

[JES @GenericJes]

@AbraxasHudson @RobSchneider @X Do you even understand the basics of science? In order for the media to report on something, such claims would first need to be backed up by peer-reviewed and published science. Do you think the media should report about a doctor's word? Get real now.

[JES @GenericJes]

@DawnsMission @BelannF @grok Is this correct?