Gideon Jacobs

We know how to change things for the better. All we need to do is act and implement the knowledge.

[Gideon Jacobs @GideonJacobs]

https://t.co/8WF5MURn3c

[Gideon Jacobs @GideonJacobs]

Mate!!? What the fuck? Like really? How about you address the following? I bet you can't. I used to like your content and what you were exposing. I'm starting to believe that there is something wrong, yes, with you.

To all the proponents of the official narrative that Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk with a .30-06 from the roof of the Losee building, I ask you to please reconcile the following for me:
1) Charlie displayed a decorticate posture. That requires damage to the red nucleus prior to damage to the spinal cord.
2) There is blood splatter and minor wounds on Charlie's left hand. How do fragments eject back out an entry wound to cause damage to his left hand?
3) Why did a supposed .30-06 round not create an exit wound in the back when based on all other expectations, it should have? Don't give the "bullets do weird things" narrative, because that is gas lighting. Also, look at the MLK autopsy photos. As far as I know, there was an exit wound because it shattered the right mandible and re-entered the neck.
4) Why is the neck measurement of the largest bullet fragment's maximum neck diameter smaller than the neck diameter of a .30-06 round?
5) Due to the behavior of the blood exiting the neck wound, it can be stated with reasonable confidence that his heart already stopped by the time the wound occurred/showed in the neck, else blood would have squirted from the carotid artery which it didn't.
6) Blood and matter expressing from an entry wound is delayed in relation to the puncture event yet the opposite is observed in this case making the neck wound more consistent with an exit wound rather than an entry wound.
7) Since the autopsy report has not been released and only limited information of the report came out in court and filings, no conclusion can be drawn from "a gunshot wound to the neck" as proof of either exit or entry.
8) If Tyler had the gun shoved down his pants, why was there no DNA on the barrel, stock, grip etc when all those areas should have been in direct contact with his body shortly before the gun was hidden in the woods, and further, why was his DNA the most degraded and only found on the finger guard?
9) Why is the clothes of the individual doing the lateral crawl footage that Candace released inconsistent with what Tyler supposedly wore on the day.
10) Why didn't the palm print on the ledge where the person on the roof disembarked the roof, match Tyler? 11) Why, according to Judicial Watch's FOI request, did the Utah Governor and the FBI ordered the removal of the soil and paving over of the area where Charlie was shot? Is it normal for a State Governor to intervene/interfere in an ongoing assassination investigation?
12) Why were the roofs not properly covered by any security, especially after what happened at Butler?
13) Why did BB felt it necessary to come out shortly after stating the Israel didn't kill Charlie? No other head of state of any other country felt it necessary to make such statement.
14) Why, according to the security team (if I remember correctly) were they not allowed to have a drone in the air during the event, but yet had one prior to the start and one can see multiple drones prior to and after Charlie went down in the air?
15) Why was Joe Kent prevented from investigating the possibility of foreign involvement?
The list goes on and on and on, but I'll stop here for now. If you can reconcile all 15 of these questions adequately with Tyler being the lone gunman with a .30-06 from the Losee building roof knowing and executing a lateral crawl etc. etc. then I will reassess my skepticism of the official narrative.

[Gideon Jacobs @GideonJacobs]

@MRobertsQLD Malcolm, I am glad to hear your tone of voice going up a notch. Time that the gloves are taken off.

[Gideon Jacobs @GideonJacobs]

@TruthFairy131 They are the dangerous ones and they know we know.

[Gideon Jacobs @GideonJacobs]

@ReVondaMichelle @Lordofthereee @chrismartenson @thedarkhorsepod @thevivafrei @jimmy_dore @Valhallachannel @heavydcountry @ZebBoykin Can you please elaborate on what specifically you'd like to draw our attention to at 41:45. What I see, considering the lip of the roof, that on 1st observation that the person was too far back to actually have rifle sight.

[Gideon Jacobs @GideonJacobs]

Here is the view according to the 3D Cad reconstruction I did. That is if the "shooter" was on the roof. If it was a drone, then it is a different story. My sound and trajectory analysis places the shooter where the red arrow is. I talked to @ZebBoykin (marine sniper) early on and we are in agreement. He pointed out a vapor cloud and my analysis of that day's atmospheric conditions let me to the conclusion that it was a subsonic round that due to air density and temperature that day, went marginally super sonic and then dropped mid flight back down to subsonic. That combined with your disclosure of the decorticate posture literally became the smoking gun for me. Then Matt @Audio_freq and I independently did stereo analysis of the echoes and came to the same spot.

[Gideon Jacobs @GideonJacobs]

Thanks. Could they have pulled a 9/11 level deception? Possibly. At the end, regardless if one believes that it was an exploding mic, a drone, a shot from a different angle or that it didn't actually happened, doesn't really matter since it is clear they are deceiving us. To prove their deception, one only need to dhow that it wasn't TR from the Losee building with a .30-06. That is a lot easier to prove than that it didn't happen or was faked in some way. Again, I go with the evidence I have and can at least rationalise. So, what does my common sense tell me?
1) I saw the 1st video maybe about 7 minutes after it happened. I just happened to be online, scrolling through X when it happened and saw a live stream or maybe it was uploaded shortly after it happened.
2) Things like the cavitation shock wave travelling observably through his neck a facial skin correlates to a bullet.
3) I mentioned the decorticate position, which I only learned of once @chrismartenson brought it to light.
4) Having been within 4 to 6 feet when my mate took a bullet to the head while I was looking at him, the neck wound immediately to me didn't correlate to a direct bullet entry injury.

And many more, so I have to main objectives in being engaged in the conversation around CK's assasination:
1) They did 9/11 which impacted everyone and it took a long time before people started to wake up to what actually happened that day. This time, I wanted to play my role as best I could to expose it;
2) I can't idly stand by and watch an innocent young man being send to death. (Doesn't mean he wasn't involved in some form, but he didn't kill CK and therefore can't be sentenced to death for aggravated murder)

[Gideon Jacobs @GideonJacobs]

To all the proponents of the official narrative that Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk with a .30-06 from the roof of the Losee building, I ask you to please reconcile the following for me:

1) Charlie displayed a decorticate posture. That requires damage to the red nucleus prior to damage to the spinal cord.

2) There is blood splatter and minor wounds on Charlie's left hand. How do fragments eject back out an entry wound to cause damage to his left hand?

3) Why did a supposed .30-06 round not create an exit wound in the back when based on all other expectations, it should have? Don't give the "bullets do weird things" narrative, because that is gas lighting. Also, look at the MLK autopsy photos. As far as I know, there was an exit wound because it shattered the right mandible and re-entered the neck.

4) Why is the neck measurement of the largest bullet fragment's maximum neck diameter smaller than the neck diameter of a .30-06 round?

5) Due to the behavior of the blood exiting the neck wound, it can be stated with reasonable confidence that his heart already stopped by the time the wound occurred/showed in the neck, else blood would have squirted from the carotid artery which it didn't.

6) Blood and matter expressing from an entry wound is delayed in relation to the puncture event yet the opposite is observed in this case making the neck wound more consistent with an exit wound rather than an entry wound.

7) Since the autopsy report has not been released and only limited information of the report came out in court and filings, no conclusion can be drawn from "a gunshot wound to the neck" as proof of either exit or entry.

8) If Tyler had the gun shoved down his pants, why was there no DNA on the barrel, stock, grip etc when all those areas should have been in direct contact with his body shortly before the gun was hidden in the woods, and further, why was his DNA the most degraded and only found on the finger guard?

9) Why is the clothes of the individual doing the lateral crawl footage that Candace released inconsistent with what Tyler supposedly wore on the day.

10) Why didn't the palm print on the ledge where the person on the roof disembarked the roof, match Tyler?

11) Why, according to Judicial Watch's FOI request, did the Utah Governor and the FBI ordered the removal of the soil and paving over of the area where Charlie was shot? Is it normal for a State Governor to intervene/interfere in an ongoing assassination investigation?

12) Why were the roofs not properly covered by any security, especially after what happened at Butler?

13) Why did BB felt it necessary to come out shortly after stating the Israel didn't kill Charlie? No other head of state of any other country felt it necessary to make such statement.

14) Why, according to the security team (if I remember correctly) were they not allowed to have a drone in the air during the event, but yet had one prior to the start and one can see multiple drones prior to and after Charlie went down in the air?

15) Why was Joe Kent prevented from investigating the possibility of foreign involvement?

The list goes on and on and on, but I'll stop here for now. If you can reconcile all 15 of these questions adequately with Tyler being the lone gunman with a .30-06 from the Losee building roof knowing and executing a lateral crawl etc. etc. then I will reassess my skepticism of the official narrative.

[Gideon Jacobs @GideonJacobs]

@TruthFairy131 The UK Government IS THE occupier, just like ours.

[Gideon Jacobs @GideonJacobs]

I agree. One would suspect a substantial amount of blood would be visible. Maybe you could ask Teryl Farnsworth. A grass cover over well drained soil could obscure an assessment from visual footage alone. I think you are insinuating that what was observed is not what happened and that it might not even be blood. The reason why I am convinced that CK was actually killed is the decorticate posture. That is in my opinion impossible, or at least damn difficult to fake accurately. The volume of blood in my mind won't offer clues as to what and how. Just my perspective. If it was a data point I could include, I would. I just don't have it and have no means of obtaining it.

[Gideon Jacobs @GideonJacobs]

@VirtualRageMstr I unfortunately can't assess what level of blood might or might no have been on the ground. It is therefore in the speculative realm and I try and stay away from speculations which would be hard for me to show supporting evidence of.

[Gideon Jacobs @GideonJacobs]

Add to that, that the recent CGT changes completely disincentivise anyone from building or creating assets here. You are not allowed to build out your own future without relying on government handouts, nor leave your children financially better off than you were when you had to start. See, financially secure people who are not reliant on government handouts are less controllable. If you rely on Centrelink to survive, they know you won't vote to reduce these handouts. The mouse doesn't understand why the cheese is free.

[DH2078 @DH2078_]

I have drafted and deleted these points a dozen times, but it’s time to let it out.

Australia’s Labor Party is a socialist shitshow, a watered down communist cosplay built on Marx’s braindead economic model that thinks a product’s value is all about labor. Human desire? Market demand? Nah, Labor is too busy buzzing off to Das Kapital to care. Here is why their ideology is a kick in the nuts for every capitalist grinding to make Australia great.

1: Marx’s labor fetish is Labor’s gospel:
They are obsessed with this 19th century drivel that says value comes from how much sweat a worker drips. A tech startup’s app isn’t worth anything because of coder's hours, it is about what people want. Labor ignores desire, taxing and regulating innovators into the ground to prop up their worker worship cult.
2: Punishing ambition with class war garbage:
Marx’s model paints capitalists as parasites stealing “surplus value.” So Labor hits businesses with crippling taxes and compliance costs to “share the wealth.” Want to build something big? Good luck when Labor’s redistributing your profits to their union cronies.
3: Union stranglehold, straight from Marx:
Labor’s union overlords think workers should run the show, holding projects hostage with strikes and bloated demands. We have CFMEU, needless to say more. Capitalists can’t innovate when every move is choked by Marxist labor laws that kill efficiency.
4: Skyrocketing costs, no desire in sight:
Marx didn’t give a toss about markets, and Labor is no different. Their green obsession jacks up energy prices with NetZero nonsense, ignoring what businesses need to thrive. Capitalists crave cheap power; Labor gives you solar panels and a smug grin.
5: Woke dogma over reality:
Marx’s labor theory ignores human wants, yet Labor pushes quotas and HR BS that make hiring a nightmare. Build a team based on merit? Nope, you’re stuck with their socialist checklist & DEI, not what the market demands.
6: Killing Australia’s vibe:
Labor’s Marxist tinged policies, big government, handouts, anti market vibes, turn Australia into a stagnant hellhole. They don’t get that value comes from desire, not labor. It is a death sentence for progress.
7: AI and robotics will expose Marx’s failure:
We are barreling toward a future where AI and robots run the show, creating value through code and automation, not sweaty labor. Marx’s model, tying value to human toil, is already a rotting corpse, it will be laughably irrelevant when machines outproduce workers. Labor is stuck fetishising manual jobs while AI startups need freedom to scale. Is Australia ready? Not with Labor’s head in Marx’s bum, choking innovation with taxes and unions.

Labor is stuck in a Marxist fever dream, and it is dragging Australia down with it. Their labor value obsession spits in the face of human desire and market reality. Time to ditch these socialist wankers and cut the red tape

[Gideon Jacobs @GideonJacobs]

Interesting. I see that the crime scene is being reconstructed. Especially the area where in my opinion the shot that killed Charlie was taken from. It might be nothing, but at this point it looks really suspect.

[Gideon Jacobs @GideonJacobs]

Yeh, I wish he would stick to covering the suppression of the exotic and zero point energy tech that have been hidden for soooo long. On those, I am with him and he has done excellent work on the MH370 mystery. Unfortunately, as it stands, it seems in relation to the CK murder, he threw all his critical assessment tools out the window. I wonder why?

[Gideon Jacobs @GideonJacobs]

@shallowchal I hope you are right Scotty. The problem is there will also be the David Farleys. Another huge obstetrical is, even if we can change the political landscape, the bureaucratic deep state.

[Gideon Jacobs @GideonJacobs]

@davepl1968 DAVE!!! Get out of my head!!!! Lol. Spot on mate. One thing you forgot was drafting the plan to plan the task that allows one to start the task.

[Jimmy Dore @jimmy_dore]

“Safe & Effective”.

Oh and it gives you Multiple Sclerosis as a bonus.

“DON’T DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH!”

Where are those people now?

[Gideon Jacobs @GideonJacobs]

As an entrepreneur, due to the CGT changes, I am contemplating leaving Australia. My position has been up till recently that since I've already once lost my country and was forced to leave South Africa due to the violence and threat to my family due to being a farmer, that I will give my blood for this country. But how can I stand and fight if the government is sucking me dry? No soldier can fight on an empty stomach. When we stood up and marched in Canberra in 2022, I still had hope. My hope that Australia can be rescued is fading and fading fast. Again, I need to decide what would be best for my family. It might be too late by the time the 2028 elections happen, that is with the hope Labor doesn't cheat and hold on to power. Elections are a farce. No voter ID required means cheating is easy and happens, a lot! The state itself is corrupted, not just the politicians. The Vax roll-out and bureaucrat behaviour is evidence of that. We can change the politicians, but can we clean out the deep state?

[Gideon Jacobs @GideonJacobs]

@KanekoaTheGreat "Oops we can't find the fragment that caused the exit wound, Sir"

"Well, then dig the whole damn lot up and ship it to China!"

Or something like that