"Groypers" won't read Leo Strauss because he was a Jew. That is retarded. Strauss was perhaps the preeminent commentator on the history of political philosophy in the 20th century. I and many others found his commentaries on Plato to be extremely insightful, not because Strauss is a Jew but because he is a careful reader and good teacher. I myself have learned from Heidegger, Schmitt, van den Bruck, Evola, and others, some of whom were members of the Nazi party, even though I am not a Nazi or Nazi sympathizer. You can learn from Leo Strauss, even though he was a Jew and you are an antisemite (unfortunately) -- provided you think it is worth understanding Plato/Aristotle/etc. By the way, many Jews are worth reading (needless to say, in most circumstances!), even if you are not a Jew, and not because they are indoctrinating you into Judaism (though some maybe are?), but because they are thoughtful guides to fundamental questions of political and human life.
Imagine not being able to see that privatizing “man’s search for meaning” presupposes a thick, substantive view of meaning, of politics, and of human nature itself.
Down the line I think Fuentes may actually become a pretty powerful counterweight to the retardation on the right. He’s smart. He’s somewhat literate. He seems to be progressively moderating now that all these overton windows have been destroyed. He’s more coherent and cogent than Tucker or Candace at this point. He fairly consistently avoids dumb retard/grifter obsessions. He doesn’t spend his time talking about demons or frankists or satanic cults. He’s still part of the retard world bc he came from the fringes but that also gives him a lot of street cred with them. Over time as we begin to start thinking past the trump era he might end up becoming a moderating force that counterbalances the hardcore retards online. He’s still wrong on so much but for serious people on the right tempering a little bit of the retardation would be a gain.
Nick Fuentes says he supports data centers
“If there’s negative externalities, they need to pay for them, but I think they’re a boon. I think they’re a big boon to the economy.”
Spencer Pratt in April: Police crime. Drugs are bad. Affordability 🙂👍
Spencer Pratt now: Put Hussein Mamdani in a catapult and launch him back to Uganda
Patriotism without nationalism is just state-worship.
Praying to the government. Naked obeisance to power. Stockholm syndrome at scale. Modern version of deified Roman emperors, but with bureaucracies. I am vomit
Have you noticed that Palestinians never seem to have “good friends” telling them “hard truths” such as: “The war you have been waging for more than a century against Jewish self-determination has been a disaster, brought nothing but bloodshed, and has been a complete failure”?
It's crazy how radical Israelis have become.
I would never have guessed that watching live-streams of foreign barbarian hordes overrunning borders, raping & pillaging through the countryside would radicalize people.
I can't imagine why Israelis support radicals.
Mamdani sounds good and is profoundly wrong. America is not exceptional because it believes nothing in particular.
In Democracy in America (which, surely, he has read) De Tocqueville points to the importance of a set of religious mores that constrain possibilities enshrined in the Constitution:
".. at the same time that the law permits the American people to do everything, religion prevents them from conceiving everything and forbids them to dare everything... [if religion] does not give them the taste for freedom, it singularly facilitates their use of it."
There is a reason for America's prosperity and it resides in freedom mixed with restraint that limits e.g. majoritarianism (the majority can be wrong about something), social engineering, and cruelty.
Liberals spent two generations converting virtually every institution in this country into a propaganda machine that taught people how Western civilization is an illegitimate tool of oppression for straight White men upon the innocent BIPOC/LGBTQ/Marginalized peoples of the world.
And then, when someone finally takes the premise seriously and declares that the whole thing must be abolished as a moral imperative, those same liberals suddenly panic and ask "How could this happen?"