Today, on my final day as Director of National Intelligence, I’m releasing never-before-seen communications and documents exposing how Dr. Fauci provided millions in US taxpayer dollars to fund dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab, worked with politicized elements within the Intelligence Community to suppress the truth about his actions and hide the virus’ lab-leak origins, and lied to Congress while under oath in 2024. It’s time you know the truth.
https://t.co/3YJSstB7d4
The revelations six years later are pouring out so quickly that it is impossible to keep up much less mentally process all this:
* The Director of National Intelligence has documented 120 US-funded/owned biolabs in 30 countries many of which are manufacturing and manipulating infectious diseases.
* Senator Rand Paul's committee has released the receipts concerning US funding/backing of the manufactured SARS-CoV-2 virus/vaccine as part of this program.
* Senator Johnson has produced definitive evidence that US public health agencies knew of the grave dangers of the shot to everyone but said nothing.
* Many officials are privately admitting/proving that the whole point of lockdowns was to preserve population immunity for the shot and block other avenues toward wellness.
* Hardly any of this makes the national news and one wonders if the public mind has any awareness at all.
🔥 The Promethean Weekly · June 1–7, 2026
Trump benched Netanyahu, Bessent buried free-market orthodoxy for Henry Clay's American System, and the jobs numbers backed him up. Seven posts on the realignment hiding behind this week's headlines — plus what's ahead.
https://t.co/GKQ3AvLnhH
I have done many investigations into statins starting around 2004.
The facts are shocking.
And then my husband was harmed by them.
Who caught it?
Not his doctors. I did.
They didn't even ask about his statin use when he had debilitating leg pain.
It should have been the first thing they asked.
They gave him shots in his knees and acted mystified when it didn't help.
Turns out he had developed a potentially fatal side effect called rhabdomyalosis.
Ony because I was reporting the stories on statins did I recognize what might be wrong.
Since I first began looking into statins, serious side effects the manufacturers initially denied have been added to the label.
Many esteemed doctors are ignorant of these, partly because of how and what they're taught in med school (see my book "Follow the Science."
In this threat I will link to some reporting on statins.
President Trump is changing more than policy.
Beneath the headlines, something deeper is happening—a renewed belief that America can solve problems, build again, and shape its own future.
Here's why that matters.
Yes, the President dropped a couple of f-bombs. But it is much bigger than that. John Bolton's whining about Trump's leadership will give you a clue. https://t.co/d5yr6khXgC
Trump may have just pulled off the most important geopolitical move of the 21st century.
Most people still haven’t realized what’s happening in the Middle East.
This changes everything.
The Council on Foreign Relations just launched a multi-year project to figure out "what comes next" — an admission their century-long mission of subjugating American policy to Britain's is finished.
@SJKokinda on what they accidentally revealed 👇
Victor Davis Hanson: Three Presidents, Three Iran Strategies
@VDHanson breaks down the contrast between the Obama, Trump, and Biden approaches to Iran, and what it means for global security.
The Iran that we had to confront today was built during the Obama administration and during the Biden administration, said Hanson
Watch the full breakdown 👇 https://t.co/tTdaoSjCNt
🚨How much do they LOVE ABORTION?
The leftist Supreme Court justices are facing accusations that they literally put their conservative colleagues’ lives at risk because they were so beholden to Roe v. Wade and abortion on demand.
Liberal Supreme Court justices slow-walked completion of their dissents in the landmark Dobbs case, according to a new book.
They delayed its official release for 53 days even as the five conservative justices in the majority faced death threats and assassination attempts following the leak of a draft opinion overturning Roe v. Wade.
That’s according to a new report on Mollie Hemingway’s forthcoming book.
The May 2, 2022, leak of the 98-page draft to Politico triggered protests outside the homes of conservative justices, vandalism and arson at hundreds of pregnancy centers, churches and pro-life organizations, and an assassination attempt on Justice Brett Kavanaugh and potentially the other conservative justices.
“Abortion supporters had an incentive to kill one or more of the justices in the majority to change the outcome,” Hemingway wrote in Alito: The Justice Who Reshaped the Supreme Court and Restored the Constitution. “Everyone knew that the leak posed a serious security risk for justices. Since decisions do not take effect until issued officially from the bench, the death of a justice before then could alter the result. The threat of assassination increased dramatically.”
Six days after the leak, on Mother’s Day, a radical firebombed the headquarters of Wisconsin Family Action, a pro-life group in Madison. In the following weeks, hundreds of pregnancy centers, churches and pro-life organizations were vandalized, some set ablaze.
Protesters demonstrated outside the homes of the conservative justices.
More than a month after the leak, Nicholas Roske, then 26, arrived at Kavanaugh’s home armed with a Glock pistol, ammunition, zip ties, a tactical knife, pepper spray, a hammer, duct tape and other items. He told authorities he planned to kill a justice or justices to prevent Roe from being overturned.
Justice Samuel Alito, who authored the majority opinion, asked the three liberal justices — Stephen Breyer, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor — to complete their work promptly.
“Alito asked the dissenters to make the completion of their dissents their priority because delay of the decision was a security threat,” Hemingway wrote.
The dissenters “demurred,” according to the book.
These leftist judges don't care about people's lives before or after birth. All they care about is abortion.
In 2015, America "redefined" marriage.
"Gay marriage" became law.
This created a demand for buyable children.
But all this rejects God's good design.
Marriage is the union of one man and one woman.
Children are not for sale.
We must overturn Obergefell and ban surrogacy.
Evangelical Christian men are often said to be Exhibit A of toxic masculinity. But what do the facts show?
"Reaching back far beyond the beginnings of industrialization, Pearcey provides a persuasive account of Christianity’s leavening influence on masculinity and the treatment of women.
Instead of following their pagan counterparts who treated marriage as a mere legal contract for begetting legitimate heirs and who normalized extramarital sex, the first Christians demanded husbands be faithful to their wives and love them “as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her” (Eph. 5:25). The mutuality of marriage and equal dignity of both male and female were Christian accomplishments amid a dehumanizing pagan environment.
Pearcey proves with exhaustive evidence that, far from “toxic masculinity,” faithful Christian practice produces compassionate husbands, marital happiness, and sexual satisfaction. Practicing Christian men are empirically better spouses, outperforming their secular and nominal Christian counterparts.
“The real problem,” Pearcey argues, “is not an inherent flaw in masculinity itself. It’s that American society has become secularist and has lost the biblical vision of manhood.”
https://t.co/dZ3FIdNehV
The year is 1950. Your doctor lights a cigarette and tells you smoking is fine. He read it in a study. He is telling the truth about having read it. He does not know, or is not saying, that the study was funded by the tobacco industry.
The year is 1958. Your doctor tells you to eat less fat. The evidence is contested. The contestation is not in the public messaging. The food industry has been helpful in clarifying which findings deserve attention. Some researchers who published contradictory data have been quietly defunded. Ancel Keys is on the cover of Time magazine.
The year is 1962. Your doctor prescribes thalidomide to your pregnant wife for morning sickness. It has been approved. The FDA gave it the green light in Europe. Twelve thousand children will be born with severe limb malformations before anyone in an official capacity acknowledges the problem. The families are told the drug was safe. The drug was approved. Both of these things remain true.
The year is 1972. Your doctor prescribes Valium. Britain is in the grip of a benzodiazepine wave that will last two decades. The dependency risk is known internally. It is not shared. Your doctor is not lying to you. He was not told either.
The year is 1999. Your doctor prescribes Vioxx for your arthritis. It is newer than ibuprofen, well-tolerated, and Merck has a study showing it works. Merck also has internal data suggesting it roughly doubles the risk of heart attack. This data will not reach your doctor for four more years. Fifty thousand people are estimated to have died in the interim. Merck eventually settles for 4.85 billion dollars. No criminal charges are brought.
The year is 2002. Your doctor prescribes OxyContin. Purdue Pharma trained its sales representatives to tell doctors the addiction risk was less than one percent. That figure came from a letter, not a study. The letter was about patients with terminal cancer on short-term doses in hospital settings. Your doctor is a GP with a patient who has a bad back. Nobody draws a distinction. Nobody is required to.
The year is 2008. Your doctor checks your cholesterol. Your LDL is elevated. You are prescribed a statin. Nobody mentions that the number needed to treat for primary prevention is approximately 250. Nobody mentions that the muscle deterioration you'll notice over the next two years is listed as a rare side effect rather than a documented pattern affecting a meaningful percentage of patients. The trial that informed the prescription was funded by the manufacturer.
Now it is today.
Your doctor has new guidelines. New studies. New consensus.
He is confident.
He has always been confident.
The confidence has never been the problem.
The confidence is, in fact, precisely the problem.
Victor Davis Hanson: I Can’t Think of a War Where We Didn’t Hit Dual‑Use Infrastructure
President Trump has threatened to strike dual-use sites in Iran, such as bridges and energy facilities, and anti-Trump critics have accused him of war crimes.
But, despite destroying one bridge, for the past five weeks, he has not authorized attacks on dual-use targets in Iran, an unusual restraint in modern conflict.
“All you people on the left and the right go back to World War II and say we want to strip FDR’s name off buildings and monuments because we obliterated, while he was still president, on March 11, 1945, Tokyo and the 11 cities that followed. And the argument was that they were assembling war materials in their suburban workshops.”
https://t.co/ZcthwJHE7c
@VDHanson
Reminder that children who do not receive one or more vaccines due to their parent’s convictions are not locked away in an attic. They are going to church, participating in sports leagues, enrolled in ballet class, are part of large homeschool meetups, etc. They are just denied, in a few states, an in-school education. In this instance, let’s be more like Sweden, Norway, Denmark, etc., that have no school mandates. Persuade parents on the merits and, if you can’t, that is called informed consent. They were informed and didn't consent; mandating over their objection is immoral and illiberal.