Self Safaris in Tanzania
( Führung und Reisebüro)
# Natur & Kultur/ Landschafts und Städtereisen in Tansania.
(Herzlich Willkommen für die Naturliebhaber)
🇷🇺 Planning a trip to Russia?
#VisitRussia is your all-in-one digital travel companion, available as both a website in browsers and a mobile app for international visitors.
The website is the perfect place to start and explore guides to Russia 👉 https://t.co/OpuxCHyqHv
General Sergey “Armageddon” Surovikin is Back & will lead Russia into ODESSA & KIEV
“I do not wish to sacrifice Russian soldiers in a guerrilla war against hordes of fanatics, armed by NATO, any longer. We have enough power & technical means to bring Ukraine to full capitulation”!
"Tunapochukua hatua walewale wanaohamasisha wanakuwa wakali sana wanatafuta sehemu ya kuegemea na mimi niwaambieni hapa ishu hata si vyama vya siasa na hatuna ugomvi na Chama chochote cha siasa, mtu asikupeleke kwenye ajenda ndogo hiyo kudogosha mpango ulioko nyuma yake, wala hatuna shida."
"Sisi kipaumbele chetu namba moja baada ya kuona mipango hiyo inayopangwa tukasema kipaumbele chetu kiwe ni ulinzi wa Nchi na raia wake. Kama waliwahi kurusha bomu kwenye mkutano wa hadhara na sasa wanataka nchi yetu ichafuke na wanavyojipanga wanataka watu wafe wafyetue risasi watu wafe waseme ni Polisi."
.... Tukasema tuzuie mikutano ya kisiasa, tufanye uchunguzi wa hizi taarifa za masuala ya kiusalama na baada ya siku kadhaa nne ama tano mikutano itarejea na kuendelea kama kawaida."Waziri Mkuu wa Tanzania Dkt. Mwigulu Nchemba leo Ijumaa Julai 03, 2026.
Jeshi la Ulinzi la Wananchi wa Tanzania (JWTZ) limewataka wananchi kupuuza wito wowote unaohamasisha vurugu na uvunjifu wa amani, huku likisisitiza kuwa halitawalinda watu watakaoshiriki vitendo hivyo.
👇 Watch: First-Ever Direct Flight From Tanzania Touches Down in Russia
The maiden flight carried 132 passengers, while 144 would be booked for the return trip, the Russian Transport Ministry reported.
The Kiev regime cut off Crimea's water in 2014, caused a major blackout in 2015 that lasted for days, and you know what it did? It only increased the hatred of the Crimean people toward Ukraine.
UK’s so-called prime minister who is supposedly preparing for war with Russia, the brainless Keir Starmer — even his own resignation was announced to the world by the U.S. prime minister. Go fix your own mess first. Russia is a heavy stone; you’ll be crushed beneath it!🇷🇺🤫💯
The EU is demanding that Georgia impose sanctions against Russia in exchange for maintaining a visa-free regime, said the speaker of the country's parliament, Shalva Papuashvili.
“They are telling us that if we want visa-free travel, we must impose sanctions against Russia, that is, commit suicide. If we destroy ourselves, who will be able to travel visa-free to the European Union? They are asking us to destroy our own country by imposing sanctions against Russia and align our visa policy with that of the European Union. We will not destroy our country, despite the fact that Brussels wants to turn visas into a political weapon,” - Shalva Papuashvili.
❗️Rais wa Urusi Mhe. Vladimir Putin, Rais wa Tanzania Mhe. Dkt. Samia Suluhu Hassan na viongozi wengine wanatarajiwa kushiriki katika kikao kikuu cha Jukwaa la Kimataifa la Kiuchumi la St.Petersburg (SPIEF).
📹Tazama hapa: https://t.co/mOsZOwgrPJ
Germany, France, and the UK are discussing with Ukraine the possibility of starting negotiations with Russia to end the war,"
This was reported by Bloomberg, which noted that the negotiations are still preliminary and any decision on interaction with Russia will be made by Ukraine.
It should be noted that a number of analysts suggest that the desire of the leading EU countries to hold negotiations arose due to fears of a recession, accelerating inflation, and further increases in fuel prices caused by the war in the Middle East.
A war of orders: Russia, Ukraine, and the future of Europe in three texts.
My attention was drawn to three recent texts that read like a single argument. Duncan Allan explains why Russia is destroying the European order built after 1991. Olena Snigyr shows what kind of order Russia is building in its place. The SWP study describes what is emerging in response: European security with Ukraine inside it and Russia outside it.
The shared conclusion is clear. The war against Ukraine is not a war over territory. It is a war over how Europe is structured: who has the right to sovereignty, and who gets to write the rules of security.
Duncan Allan identifies the root cause. Russia acts according to the logic of a great power - and this is not merely about strength or influence, but about special rights: to rule at home without outside criticism, to maintain a sphere of influence, to limit the choices of its neighbors, and to demand recognition as an equal. This leads to a conclusion that many avoid: the issue is not NATO. What Moscow cannot tolerate is the very idea that neighboring states can choose their own course independently. That destroys the Russian hierarchy in which states are not equal.
Olena Snigyr shows what exactly Russia is building in place of what it has destroyed. The Russian international order is a system of unequal circles. At the center is Russia itself and the space of its direct control. Further out are neighbors held in place through force, dependency, intimidation, and bought elites. Further still are partners tied by benefit, anti-Western solidarity, and a shared interest in weakening the West. The tools vary - violence, gas, debt, corruption, information campaigns. The principle is the same: the world is divided into zones of influence among several powers, and Russia is among those that decide for others.
Here, both authors converge: Russia’s foreign policy is the export of its domestic order. Allan describes the current system as wartime Putinism resting on three pillars: repression, anti-Western mobilization, and a militarized economy. Snigyr shows that the same logic is projected outward. Russia does not simply want influence - it reproduces around itself its own model of power: coercion, control, dependency, and managed approval.
That is why not only tanks and gas contracts matter, but narratives as well. The Russian order rests on stories: the external enemy, “traditional values,” a special path, the cult of Victory, the “historical unity” of peoples. These stories turn violence into “protection,” dependency into “brotherhood,” and the seizure of another country’s sovereignty into “historical justice.”
Ukraine and Belarus occupy a special place. Control over them is not a trophy, but part of the answer to the question of what Russia itself is. If Ukraine consolidates itself as a sovereign European state, it is not only Russia’s plan of influence that collapses - the very story through which the Kremlin justifies itself collapses as well. That is why the war is not instrumental for the regime, but existential. At stake is Moscow’s right to decide the fate of its neighbors - and its demand that the West recognize this right.
SWP adds a third dimension: Europe’s response. The old model, in which Russia was treated as a partner or at least a necessary interlocutor, can no longer be restored. The question is now different: how to build European security with Ukraine inside the system - and without Russia among those who write its rules. Russia is not going anywhere; it remains the main military threat. But from a co-creator of the order, it has turned into a state from which that order must be defended. Ukraine, meanwhile, is moving in the opposite direction - from a “security problem” into one of its supporting pillars. The former buffer and object of other people’s agreements has become a condition of a stable European order: one guaranteed by the Ukrainian army, resilience, and political choice.
This is where the three texts come together. Allan explains why compromise with Russia is so difficult: its demands are not about concessions, but about the very principle of order. Snigyr explains why Russia will not back down: the project is embedded in the way the regime holds power and sees itself. SWP explains why the response is becoming a restructuring of European security around Ukraine and against the Russian threat.
The same framework also exposes the weak point. From the outside, Russia looks invulnerable: it adapts to sanctions, shifts the economy onto a war footing, applies pressure through repression, and maintains support through fear and control of information. But endurance is not stability. Snigyr shows where the limit lies: the system can absorb gradual pressure, but not simultaneous pressure. Economic collapse can be absorbed.
Military defeat can be rewritten by propaganda. Political crisis can be suppressed. But when the pillars weaken together, rather than one by one, the regime loses its ability to adapt.
Snigyr also points to the paradox: the regime’s greatest strength is also its point of fragility. All the legitimacy of power is concentrated in one figure - this provides control, but it also makes the system hostage to one person. Once that center disappears, the regime begins to disintegrate from within until it finds a replacement.
The conclusion for Europe is direct. If the challenge is not only military, then the response cannot be only military either. Defense, support for Ukraine, sanctions, technological containment, and strategic clarity are necessary - but not sufficient. Russia is fighting over how people see reality, history, and justice. Therefore, Europe must defend not only borders, but also the ability to call things by their names. Aggression is not a “conflict of interests.” A sphere of influence is not a “security guarantee.” Conquest is not “historical justice.” And peace is not a return to an order in which the aggressor dictates rules to the victim.
Together, these texts show one thing: Russia’s war against Ukraine is the front line of a wider war of orders. Russia is destroying a model in which states choose their own path. Ukraine is defending not only its territory, but that principle itself. And Europe is reaching the conclusion it avoided for a long time: its security cannot be built by appeasing Russia - only by including Ukraine, containing Russia, and defending the rules without which Europe ceases to be itself.
🇷🇺 Russia’s Permanent Representative to the UN, Vasily Nebenzya:
“The tragedy in Starobilsk cannot be silenced. It was a deliberate crime by the Kyiv regime. This is Zelensky’s revenge against the residents of the Luhansk People’s Republic for choosing to side with Russia.
The West has not condemned the terrorist attack in Starobilsk, while at the same time accusing Russia of striking civilian infrastructure without any evidence.
Nebenzya stated that Russia will strike decision-making centers and military-industrial facilities in Ukraine in response to Kyiv’s terrorist attacks.”