Really hope you reconsider how FireLight rewards that are being distributed to early FXRP stakeholders that provided liquidity for the project. I’ve been involved with FireLight from the start. In fact, my wallet is one of the exclusive 3,000 members of the Firelight Protocol waitlist. Well I just discovered that my millions of points accumulated on Firelight are worthless. Firelight’s marketing and user documentation explicitly stated that rewards would be distributed "in proportion to the Firelight Points earned by eligible addresses". They did not give early adopters any warning that a 1 stXRP minimum balance would be instituted as a strict entry requirement to filter out active point-holders. I’ve moved off my FXRP to higher yield opportunities on the Flare network as it matured but certainly would have left at least one FXRP in Firelight if it was documented. This is really unfair and imagine other early adopters of Flare are feeling the same way. Please help.
@BCdacker Wanted to make you aware and hope that you have some influence in the FireLight rewards that are being distributed to early FXRP stakeholders that provided liquidity for the project. I’ve been involved with FireLight from the start. In fact, my wallet is one of the exclusive 3,000 members of the Firelight Protocol waitlist. Well I just discovered that my millions of points accumulated on Firelight are worthless. Firelight’s marketing and user documentation explicitly stated that rewards would be distributed "in proportion to the Firelight Points earned by eligible addresses". They did not give early adopters any warning that a 1 stXRP minimum balance would be instituted as a strict entry requirement to filter out active point-holders. I’ve moved off my FXRP to higher yield opportunities on the Flare network as it matured but certainly would have left at least one FXRP in Firelight if it was documented. This is really unfair and imagine other early adopters of Flare are feeling the same way. Please help.
A massive number of early contributor wallets are being filtered out for this exactly reason. This specific issue has sparked major frustration throughout the community because the requirement was effectively applied retroactively during the October 6 snapshot.
@HugoPhilion I’m hoping that you have some influence in the FireLight rewards that are being distributed to early FXRP stakeholders that provided liquidity for the project. I’ve been involved with FireLight from the start. In fact, my wallet is one of the exclusive 3,000 members of the Firelight Protocol waitlist. Well I just discovered that my millions of points accumulated on Firelight are worthless. Firelight’s marketing and user documentation explicitly stated that rewards would be distributed "in proportion to the Firelight Points earned by eligible addresses". They did not give early adopters any warning that a 1 stXRP minimum balance would be instituted as a strict entry requirement to filter out active point-holders. I’ve moved off my FXRP to higher yield opportunities on the Flare network as it matured but certainly would have left at least one FXRP in Firelight if it was documented. This is really unfair and imagine other early adopters of Flare are feeling the same way. Please help.
Hey Tony. Wanted to make you aware and hope that you have some influence in the FireLight rewards that are being distributed to early FXRP stakeholders that provided liquidity for the project. I’ve been involved with FireLight from the start. In fact, my wallet is one of the exclusive 3,000 members of the Firelight Protocol waitlist. Well I just discovered that my millions of points accumulated on Firelight are worthless. Firelight’s marketing and user documentation explicitly stated that rewards would be distributed "in proportion to the Firelight Points earned by eligible addresses". They did not give early adopters any warning that a 1 stXRP minimum balance would be instituted as a strict entry requirement to filter out active point-holders. I’ve moved off my FXRP to higher yield opportunities on the Flare network as it matured but certainly would have left at least one FXRP in Firelight if it was documented. This is really unfair and imagine other early adopters of Flare are feeling the same way. Please help.
They did not give early adopters any warning that a 1 stXRP minimum balance would be instituted as a strict entry requirement to filter out active point-holders. I’ve moved off my FXRP to higher yield opportunities on the Flare network as it matured but certainly would have left at least one FXRP in Firelight if it was documented. This is really unfair!