@chukbaik@Kaivvk Someone keeps spamming my tweets with nonsense without any credible sources to back it up lmfao x is indeed a place that all mental patients are free to speak lol
@BombsRuki76409@chukbaik@Kaivvk The Gaogouli, however, have never claimed to be of the same ethnicity as the ancestors of Korea. That is the key difference.
History isn’t whatever you subjectively believe it to be. we must analyze it objectively through DNA, historical records, and archaeological excavations.
@BombsRuki76409@chukbaik@Kaivvk Given the huge differences in DNA, culture, and beliefs, please tell me how you came to be part of the same ethnic group?
@chukbaik@Kaivvk In terms of cultural identity, Gaogouli indeed shares very few similarities with your culture, with beliefs and customs that are fundamentally different. Furthermore Gaogouli themselves do not consider themselves to be of the same ethnicity as you that’s the most important part.
You didn’t understand what she said at all
FuyuGoguryeo were NEITHER Han OR Korean, they just ruled Korea and shared religion and culture with Chinese
Han and Fuyu’s religion👉三足金烏
Korean religion 👉 檀君熊女
三足金烏 belong to Han totally since Shu dynasty 3600 years ago
Step inside the Miao Ethnic Traditional Clothing Museum in Qiandongnan Miao and Dong Autonomous Prefecture, and you’ll find yourself surrounded by living epics woven into fabric. Every piece of Miao embroidery carries stories passed down for generations.
Watching a Korean nationalist repeatedly ask Grok to rebrand ancient Chinese cultural heritage as “Dongho/Korean” is peak comedy.
Even Grok kept answering:
No.
That is the whole tragedy.
When archaeology refuses them, they go beg a chatbot.
When the chatbot refuses them, they keep asking until nationalism starts looking like a mental condition.
You cannot steal civilization by screenshotting Grok.
You cannot turn Buyeo into Korea by emotional repetition.
And you cannot manufacture ancestry out of insecurity.
Chinese civilization is not your lost-and-found box.
Ancient Northeast Asian history is not a Korean cosplay closet.
And Grok is not a shaman you can summon to rewrite Chinese cultural inheritance.
The funniest part?
Even the machine got tired and still said:
No.
Some foreigners seem to confuse the Tang唐Dynasty(618-907)with the Later Tang(houtang后唐) Dynasty. The Later Tang (923–937) 后唐was a short-lived Shatuo dynasty that ruled northern China for only 13 years after the collapse of the Tang Dynasty. Though it had only four emperors, they belonged to three different Y-DNA haplogroups. Li Keyong and his son Li Cunxu (the first emperor) were from the same patrilineage. The second and third emperors were from another patrilineage(adopted son). the first three emperors were all members of the Shatuo turk. The last emperor, Li Congke was also an adopted son and ethnically Han Chinese. According to currently available samples of Tang唐imperial clan members—the aunt of emperor Li Yuan李渊 (SXJC01)—her ancestry consists of 95-97% Miaozigou_MN-related ancestry and 2-4% West Eurasian steppe-related ancestry. The genetic distance between Li Keyong (Later Tang/Houtang后唐) and SXJC01 (Tang Dynasty) is greater than the genetic difference between Heilongjiang黑龙江and Guangdong广东today.
@moanimokgu@CcEva_ The original poster used the term "mythical beasts of the East" to blur the origins, so I think it's perfectly fine for her to use "Chinese art" to refer to the origin of this mythological element.