former student-athlete. marketing student + growth operator.
obsessed with viewer psychology, content performance, and turning attention into measurable brand ROI.
in year one, i directly led and scaled creator campaigns that generated 800M+ views while managing $600K+ in creator spend.
building across startups, AI, and the creator economy documenting as i learn along the way.
@brandonbao U shouldn’t have to pay for each one as most good editors do it free —but I’ve offered to pay for it upon selection to be my editor as a courtesy
When you get to a certain level people will always try to bring you down.
If you’ve ever worked with SideShift you know how great our team is to our customers and it will stay that way forever.
No fugazi here
tried to investigate sideshift the same way I did content rewards. wasn't expecting this.
usually when I start pulling on these platforms something falls apart within ten minutes. fake numbers, hidden fees, a team page that doesn't exist.
sideshift actually checks out.
here's what I found digging through it:
-1,500+ brands sourcing creators through one dashboard, real names like Replit and Brex attached publicly
-700K+ creators already applying to briefs instead of brands cold DMing and getting ghosted
-5B+ views across campaigns in the last 90 days, and that number is verifiable through their reporting, not just a claim on the homepage
-100M+ paid out to creators, automated payouts instead of someone manually venmoing people
-every applicant gets screened and scheduled within 24 hours
the model is simple. brand posts a brief, creators apply, platform handles tracking and payment.
no smoke and mirrors, just a straightforward marketplace doing what agencies charge five figures for.
still poking around but so far this is the first one in a while that didn't make me want to write a takedown.
I think you’re overestimating volume and underestimating execution.
One creator can literally pay for an entire campaign overnight. Is it rare? Sure. But it happens —often enough to be worth any risk as well🤷🏾♂️
I’ve personally run campaigns with 4–5 creators that blew up and converted because the content strategy, creator selection, and iteration were dialed in.
More creators ≠ better results. It simply gives you more shots on goal and more data, faster. If the person leading growth actually understands content, creator selection, and creative iteration, you can absolutely build a successful campaign with 4–5 creators.
I’ve done it multiple times. Even before having a strong understanding on content & UGC
If a $299 platform fee (for a platform that handles everything end to end) is the deciding factor, you’re probably just not at the stage where paid creator acquisition should be the priority.
@guillemcraft just took a look—that acc is cooked my friend.
I’ve seen hundreds of these over the last month less than 1% have recovered the acc
it doesn’t have a huge following so would be best to just start over + start with recreating your highest performing content on the new acc