humble_trader16

Using account as trade journal and meeting always right Fintwit errs 😁

[humble_trader16 @HTrader16]

@Twitter it’s time to take steps!! This CCP jerk @zlj517 is spreading propaganda against the United States day and night. #ccpLies #CCPLiedPeopleDied #CCPViurs

[humble_trader16 @HTrader16]

@Sahilkr11_ Sound like Ek number ka chutiya. Tera IQ 10 nai rahega the way you speak.

[humble_trader16 @HTrader16]

@Sahilkr11_ People like you are degrading society.

[Jeffrey Gundlach @TruthGundlach]

Forbes, May14, 2026:

“A 10.6% Contrarian Play On Gundlach’s Private Credit Hysteria.”

Clip and save.

[Aylo @alpha_pls]

The S&P 500 triggered a rare technical event today, gapping above both its 50D and 200D moving averages simultaneously.

This looked weird to me, so I did some digging.

Since 1950, this specific signal has occurred only four times. In every instance, the index faced significant pullbacks shortly after. The average three month drawdown following the signal is -9.51%, with the worst three month drawdown reaching -12.92% during 2018.

Historically this has always been an exhaustion gap rather than a sustainable rally.

Maybe this time is different.

[humble_trader16 @HTrader16]

@MarketMike @PeterReznicek

[Ted Zhang @TedHZhang]

$FSLY was highest volume ever yesterday by 2x!! INSANE VOLUME.

Up another 13% today making higher highs.

I haven't see a monster like this in quite some time.'

Just hard to get size on in this current market.

[Jeffrey Gundlach @TruthGundlach]

Financial Times: “Private Credit funds are mostly unlevered…”

Clip and save.

[Beardo @BeardoTrader]

I’ve been comparing major tops in $SPY over the past few decades, and the one that most closely resembles this year is the 2015 flash crash.

[Mike @MarketMike]

I have been tracking SPX Expected Moves for many years, so what I say next is based on my opinion and prior experience. We just went two weeks in a row without tagging the weekly Expected Move. It’s fairly rare to go three weeks in a row without tagging. We did that during last December’s holiday trade; the time before that was in October 2024.

Given that it’s rare and that price on $SPY has been coiling up, I would absolutely expect us to move the ±14 of expectations next week. It’s possible it doesn’t, but it is more probable when basing it on historic EMs.

This is what $SPY looks like YTD with each weekly EM. We have had 1 close outside of the weekly EM (12.5%), 4 out of 8 weeks tagged (50%), 7 out of 8 weeks closed inside (87.5%).

The weekly expected moves have been rather large. In my opinion, it’s because we have had elevated/trending volatility, but also because we have spent a lot of time underneath the gamma flip line.

Let's get ready to rumble!!!

[humble_trader16 @HTrader16]

@_SeanDavid This place is basically a coasting heaven!

[humble_trader16 @HTrader16]

@marketmike Me too!

[R @AlphaWizarDD]

Mark Minervini explained the Holy Grail of trading any stock.

Serious traders must watch it.

[Ben Calusinski @BCalusinski]

Society is broken and here’s proof:

None of these do anything for you unless
1. You’re long-term investing (Hood/Coinbase)
2. You’re intelligent enough to arbitrage the majority of idiots using them (10%)

Everyone else is exit liquidity that results in a WORSE society at large

[humble_trader16 @HTrader16]

@Venu_7_ Will be Watching your posts like a hawk!

[TT3 @TradingThomas3]

Warsh is currently partnered with Druckenmiller, basically buy everything Druckenmiller owns 😂

[humble_trader16 @HTrader16]

@Venu_7_ Me too! It’s crazy that Stan owns it and I learnt from him that you buy first and then do all the research! Real life lesson learnt!

[Avery @ATMSnipes]

$SPY

Why 687 is so important to me.

History shows it.

2022. Ascending triangle accompanied with a rising wedge.

Ascending triangle failed.

Cya later.

2025. Ascending Triangle accompanied with a rising wedge.

Ascending triangle failed.

Cya Later.

2026??

Ascending triangle accompanied with a rising wedge.

Its clear buyers will keep trying for higher above 687 (see since January 5th) but once that fails.. look out.

History doesn't repeat for the same reason as to why we will top but you can see it rhyming in the structure.

Especially once you look at the dates the other local tops occurred and where we are now timeline wise

[Grant @glbeaty]

The looks wrong? Here's a photo from Dec 15th I bought. I've never seen $BE SOFCs in this pattern.

Local filings suggest linear generators are providing power until Bergens arrive.

Maybe these are Mainspring 250kW linears?

https://t.co/5UJbTl8fso

https://t.co/M8wbqyz5Nq

[Yatharth Mann @yatharthmann]

Larry Page: “Elon is one of the people who genuinely understands physics and applies it.”

Sergey Brin: “Elon is someone who thinks extremely deeply about hard technical problems.”

Eric Schmidt: “Elon is extremely smart. He thinks about problems at a fundamental physics level.”

Satya Nadella: “Elon has a deep understanding of engineering trade-offs.”

Yann LeCun: “He’s a very smart guy and I’m in awe of some of his projects.”

Jeff Dean: “Elon Musk is extremely capable technically.”

Andrew Ng: “Elon is clearly very smart and technically capable, even when I disagree with him.”

Neil deGrasse Tyson: “Elon Musk understands engineering at a level that most CEOs do not.”

Chris Hadfield: “Elon Musk is clearly very intelligent and serious about engineering.”

Andrej Karpathy: “Elon has an incredible ability to reason from first principles. It’s very rare.”

Tom Mueller: “He’s a super smart guy and he learns from talking to people. He’s so sharp, he just picks it up.”

Jim Cantrell: “Elon taught himself rocket science faster than anyone I’ve ever seen. And I’ve been doing this my whole career.”

Robert Zubrin: “Elon Musk is a brilliant engineer with an extraordinary ability to cut through nonsense.”

George Church: “Elon Musk is extraordinarily intelligent and unusually well-read across sciences.”

Vaclav Smil: “Elon Musk is a very intelligent engineer, though overly optimistic.”

Miguel Nicolelis: “Elon Musk is a brilliant mind, even when he overreaches.”

George Hotz: “Elon is actually very smart. People underestimate how technical he really is.”

Sal Khan: “Elon Musk is a deeply intelligent person who genuinely understands the science behind what he’s building.”

Mark Cuban: “Elon is very smart and ahead of the curve.”

Naval Ravikant: “Elon Musk is operating at a different intellectual level.”

Rodney Brooks: “Elon Musk is smart and technically literate, even if provocative.”

Cory Doctorow: “Elon Musk is obviously very smart. That’s not in dispute.”

Tim Urban: “Elon Musk is one of the deepest first-principles thinkers I’ve ever encountered.”

Uday Kotak: “Elon Musk is a genius in the way he combines engineering with execution.”

[sheng @investwithsheng]

$AMD

Still in a down trend from the October high

wave w and wave y show similar time duration, if this final corrective wave z exhibits similar time relationship, price is set to bottom around the first week of December