Introducing RSI-Anything: Unlocking Recursive Self-Improvement with World Models ๐
Can AI learn to improve itself by predicting the consequences of its actions?
Built on JEPA-Anything, RSI-Anything uses world models to guide action selection and learning. Feedback improves the policy or workflow and, when needed, the world model. Validated updates carry forward to shape the next round of experience.
Across code, GUI interaction, laboratory planning, and reaction optimization:
โข Code-repair success: 26.3% โ 31.2%, with the coder fixed
โข GUI agent task: 39.4% fewer actions, with higher completion
โข Lab-planning scores: 21.80% โ 46.01% over five policy versions
โข Mean best observed reaction yield: 96.15% vs. 82.16% for Bayesian optimization, under the same 40-experiment budget
๐ Paper: https://t.co/8p44YbLjqE
๐ป Code: https://t.co/EqXmXvtaM4
Watch the video below ๐
#RSI #WorldModels #RSI #AIAgents #AIforScience #JEPA
i used to think an AI team meant me + a few agents. then i tried Teamily AI, a Humans + Agents platform where other people sit in the same group as the agents, on the same context. different thing entirely.
so: what if an AI team could find the best new generation of AI careers for you?
i put 3 agents and a partner i'm working with in one group and gave them the same question:
1. AI Engineer - researched 10 genuinely new AI-native careers
2. Principal Architect - ranked the 7 most interesting ones into a page with Website Builder
3. QA Tester - opened that page, challenged the list, rejected 3 and suggested better replacements
then I jumped in again with "prioritize roles with real demand and low competition", and the Architect rebuilt the page with the QA swaps and that ask.
one agent researched, one ranked, one challenged the work, and a human pushed it further. one question to a finished page, all in one chat.
this is what an AI team actually feels like.
final page: https://t.co/qJr3nCFWKk
@Teamily_AI
try it: https://t.co/o9FryV1qQV