@StanCollymore If you are only as good as your weakest player I think that was probs Noni, but tbf its a pretty high bar for England at the min, They remind me of a 90's Germany team
Warning: if you study the history of obesity science--specifically, where the energy balance/overeating thinking came from--you'll learn why the best medical scientists in the world rejected it as a failed hypothesis--"the dead end of the energetic view" as it was described in 1936.
By the 1930s, European scientists had collected a world of observations about fat storage that overeating couldn't begin to explain. But their thinking got lost with the Second World War, and so we've been living with the energy balance dogma ever since.
Shouldn't Where We Get Fat (and When) Tell Us Something About Why? https://t.co/EFZHuSw36Q
What the post also shows is that no single dietary intervention has been shown, in a long term study, to improve long term human health. Not diets that substitute polyunsaturated fats for saturated fats; not diets that replace fat with carbohydrate.
Yet I doubt there is a single faculty teaching human nutrition anywhere in the world that ever makes this point.
Probably the most important study is the LookAhead study which tested dietary fat reduction in obese type 2 diabetes. After 9.5 years it was given up as a. hopeless failure. Which of course it was not. It was only a failure for those who, filled with cognitive dissonance, have and will continue to prescribe that diet in the hope that somehow their patients will respond differently.
Yet what diet does one think is prescribed by "evidence-based" doctors and dietitians, for most of the world's persons living with that condition?
On the other hand, the one diet that has yet to be properly investigated with long term trials is the low-carbohydrate high-fat diet.
Yet the reason most usually advanced by the "evidence-based" practitioners to explain why the low-carbohydrate diet should not be prescribed is "because there are no long term studies".
So instead the diets that are prescribed (because there are long-term trials - regardless of outcomes) are exactly those which long-term studies show are either harmful or without effect.
A strange situation is it not?
@garytaubes@bigfatsurprise@lowcarbGP@BenBikmanPhD@markkaplan20@AKoutnik@LoreofRunning1
Attempted to write a Steam Engine hype at the era of Industrial Revolution as if it was the age of AI โ
The steam engine breakthrough is insane right now.
Wattโs separate condenser + new GRPO optimization just dropped the 405 hp-class engine. We went from 7 hp โ 70 hp โ 405 hp+ in basically three years. One machine now does the work of 50+ men or water wheels โ nonstop, rain or shine, anywhere.
Textile mills, ironworks, everything scaling 5-10x overnight. Productivity exploding.
This isnโt incremental. Itโs automating physical labor at massive scale. Jobs shifting forever. Society about to look unrecognizable.
The Industrial Revolution isnโt coming. Itโs here and accelerating faster than anyone predicted.
Terrified. Excited. Both.
What a time to be alive. ๐๐จ
Hey @X is this a joke? I call out inappropriate behavior and content in gyms but there is NEVER any nudity and if there is, I cover it up. Millions of views which YOU get paid for and not even a discussion? There was no โthoroughโ review. Just one email and DONE. Do better Xโฆ