@BDAOfficialGok@XpressBengaluru Regardless of whether main road or service road and whether being inaugurated or not a completed work has collapsed.Are they accepting they window dress main roads and those being inaugurated?BDA is shameless,arrogant and irresponsible corrupt den
https://t.co/hbEeskvFAK may have been acquired 100 years ago.If the allotment was done during existence of RERA and development not complete even Now,BDA should come under the ambit of RERA and compensate for delay. @NPKLOpenForum@CMofKarnataka@namlasuresh
@BDAOfficialGok@Captain_Mani72 100's of General Public are the same, citizens of India. This interim is going to be short lived. Land Acquisition could have been started before 2017, But Money was collected from 1000's of General Public and sites were registered after 2017. @NPKLOpenForum@KA_HomeBuyers
@BDAOfficialGok@Captain_Mani72 100's of General Public are the same, citizens of India. This interim is going to be short lived. Land Acquisition could have been started before 2017, But Money was collected from 1000's of General Public and sites were registered after 2017. @NPKLOpenForum@KA_HomeBuyers
@kandagal_p@Essveen@BDAOfficialGok@NPKLOpenForum Doubt if they will ever pay.If they had so much conscience and responsibility they would have finished the project in time.Regulatory agencies willfully turning a blind eye.
BDA Declared a "Promoter" Under RERA Karnataka RERA Appellate Tribunal (March 3, 2026) dismissed BDA's appeal, ruling: BDA = "Promoter" under RERA Act when developing layouts. Must register projects (NPKL) under RERA Must comply with all RERA obligations like private developers Cannot claim exemption as "Planning Authority"
@DKShivakumar@ShobhaBJP@nimmasuresh@stsomashekar@mlanaharis@Captain_Mani72@hrsrajanna@BDAOfficialGok
#RERA #BDA #NPKL
@BDAOfficialGok BDA wants siteowners to follow the rules but themselves don't follow the law-case in point,not complaint with RERA and claiming they are not subject to it-severely castigated by Appellate Tribunal
@DKShivakumar@mlanaharis@ShobhaBJP@nimmasuresh@STSomashekarMLA@lkatheeq@Captain_Mani72@hrsrajanna@CNASHOKA1@BDAOfficialGok@TVMohandasPai@kiranshaw
One layout ready in 3 years. Another waiting for 9. Same authority—two very different outcomes.
One under continuous judicial monitoring (Supreme Court, Chandrashekar Committee, now High Court) — the other without judicial oversight.
Delivery should not depend on monitoring pressure—citizens deserve uniform standards everywhere.
Video 1 – Dr Shivarama Karanth Layout (under judicial monitoring):
No to negligible land acquisition issues,
Formation began ~3 years ago. Though allotment is yet to begin, the layout is practically “ready to construct.”
Roads asphalted with good quality. Footpaths completed. UGD laid. Water supply provision in place. Electricity nearing completion. Strong sector connectivity. CA & parks fenced.
Sites are neat and clean, boundary stones fixed, numbering clearly visible individual utility connections properly marked and culvert network closed with slabs.
Video 2 – Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout (9 years old):
Majorly DPR, App5oved scheme plan violated, Sites allotted in 2016 & 2018. Basic amenities still “work in progress.” Multiple deadlines have passed. Another May 2026 deadline may come and go—but on ground, “work in progress” has not changed to “completed.”
Even after 9 years, 1000+ acres acquisition remains pending. In ~2800 acres formed area,along with many works, finishing works are yet to be completed.
Continuity and connectivity remain weak across layout.Asphalting has picked up, but quality appears inconsistent. Electricity work lags. UGD and water supply face continuity issues due to acquisition gaps.
Finishing works such as site and culvert cleaning, demarcation, numbering, culvert slab covering, and signboards are progressing at a very slow pace.
No footpaths. No proper inter-block connectivity—MAR remains the only lifeline, No slabs on culverts network.