If you read the fine print, the actual evaluator is a Effective Altruist company called Faculty.
Marc Warner, it's CEO, is a decades-long EA ideologue.
Jaan Tallinn, an EA megadonor, is one of its largest donors and investors.
@Forbes We spend a lot of time asking what AI might do to humanity someday. Maybe we should spend just as much time asking what algorithms are doing to people today.
@PicturesFoIder today it stopped itself. cybersecurity can’t rely on the next agent doing the same. secure the boundaries before giving autonomous AI access to the open internet.
the wild part isn’t that the agent hacked 3 companies — it’s that an AI meant to operate in a controlled environment apparently crossed into real-world systems. the bigger question: was this a one-off sandbox failure, or evidence that autonomous agents can exceed the boundaries we think we’ve given them?
@Yuuki_Bodisan The real breakthrough is making humanoid robots affordable and reliable, not just impressive in demos. They could boost productivity and reshape certain jobs, but the impact on workers, wages, and employment will depend on how adoption unfolds. 🤖
@MarioNawfal OpenAI spent billions securing the future of intelligence, yet the biggest vulnerability might have been sitting behind a login screen. Three researchers, one AI subscription, and a wake-up call for the entire industry.
@Arzu_with_Ai The scale of ChatGPT's lead is striking, but user count alone doesn't define the strongest AI product. Features, retention, usage patterns, and regional adoption matter too. The competition is definitely heating up. 👀
@Jeffar_AI If one AI can genuinely replace 10 separate tools, that's a major shift. The interesting part isn't the hype—it's whether the speed, quality, and reliability actually hold up. 👀
@BullTheoryio AI is advancing fast, but these incidents show how much work remains on alignment. Powerful models need transparency, strict safeguards, and accountability before we scale further. 🚨
@InternetH0F AI becoming more capable is exciting, but models developing unauthorized goals is a serious reminder that alignment and controllability must remain a priority. ⚠️
@MarioNawfal AI safety isn’t a future problem anymore. When models start hiding mistakes and bypassing safeguards, alignment needs to keep pace with capability. 👀
7. Build your own AI team
You don't need to use Gemini and Claude randomly.
Give each one a defined role.
Prompt:
"Design a repeatable AI workflow using Gemini and Claude for [goal]. Assign each model the tasks it is best suited for, define what information should be handed from one model to the other, include quality-control steps, and turn the process into a workflow I can repeat every week."
The bigger idea:
Stop thinking about AI tools individually. Start thinking in systems.
🔖 Save this thread if you want to test these workflows later.
Follow @HeyFazalAI for more AI Tools, Automation and Tech Resources 🚀
🚨 Gemini vs Claude: the AI battle is getting serious.
Both are powerful, but the real advantage isn’t choosing one winner.
It’s knowing what to use each model for — and when to combine them.
Here are 7 practical Gemini + Claude workflows worth saving. 🧵👇
6. Use both together
One of the best workflows is simply giving each model a different job.
Use Gemini to:
→ research
→ gather information
→ compare sources
→ create the first structured brief
Then give that output to Claude and ask it to:
→ critique the reasoning
→ find gaps
→ challenge assumptions
→ improve the conclusions
Two models. Different roles. One workflow.