@CosmonautMarcus Choice between them getting his name or just knowing what his armor looks like and what ammo he uses (which is supposedly really hard to identify)
@The_Clermontian For one it says there are heroes on both sides, not that everyone one both sides are heroes.
And also it probably refers to heroes in the Greek sense as someone possessing superhuman powers in the pursuit of glory, which definitely fits Grievous
@coreyloses Also implying that Luke being extremely powerful was a good thing and not one of the major weaknesses of the early EU.
OP characters = good media
@Undue_Risk It’s a natural development imo, the name is literally a play on Che Guevara. This was probably always intended to be that characters future. Whitaker is just way too old
@ettingermentum I'm sure there's some sort of caveat in the methodology, but I truly never thought Trump could crash through his 35% floor. Numbers never thought possible
@yveslvrrs@hedgebrush The original tweet: “*your* social and economic politics”. The OP referred to “the thoughts in your head”, that’s why I was replying talking about that. Learn to read
@hedgebrush It’s an extreme oversimplification to view social politics as an extension of economic politics or vice versa. They are interlinked, but they can and do move independently.
@hedgebrush That’s why I referred to one’s personal opinion, not objective impacts. In the great majority of cases one’s opinion on social issues like the ones I mentioned is formed based on personal morals, not downstream economic effects.
@hedgebrush Example: gay marriage. Not many people’s opinion on the permissibility of gay marriage would change if marriage stopped providing economic benefits. The importance of the issue is for the most part not based on its economic effects but on moral considerations.