At Historic Designation Without Representation we make three requests to reform the process:
Lower costs, require local support, and greater transparency.
OPINION: A DC Historic Preservation Review Board decision nearly turned one couple’s dream house into a nightmare – requiring them to spend 6x more than necessary to replace non-historic siding. Fortunately, a higher authority intervened: https://t.co/9USbN0jw7h
@Ward3Vision @MatthewFrumin @BeauFinleyANC3C @henryzcohen @deirdreforward3 Unfortunately HP is used as a bludgeon against inclusive housing in the district. Chevy Chase is looking to designate, undermining DCs efforts to add more affordable housing, especially in NW, which has a long history of exclusionary and explicitly racist zoning laws.
Historic district advocates have long contended that neighborhood landmarking is a boon for affordability, but one thing you should know about this claim is that it is a lie.
Here's a list of 29 studies that show that district landmarking increases the cost of housing.
THREAD
And, it’s time for @HistoricReform generally. It is time for DC to take a balanced approach to HP, that can consider transportation, climate change, and other matters of livability when considering Historic Preservation.
For some reason HPRB has scheduled an in-person hearing to determine whether to extend the unpopular Kingman Park historic district for July 30 at 9am. @FOKPcivic@BlairTamara https://t.co/H3ObGzpHhe
@BCAppelbaum Thanks for your article on historic preservation in DC. Thought you might be interested in taking a look at this https://t.co/NyU3ZqKKwd esp the maps of impacts on affordable housing. Also worth mentioning reformhd is just a neighborhood group, no funding from anyone
The NYTimes gets it... "Historic preservation, in practice, is not about preserving history. It is about preserving the lifestyle of an affluent urban elite." https://t.co/78DqVgLH25