Excited to share our @DSI_UChicago new work accepted by ICLR 2026, with the remarkable Siyang Wu, Sida Li, Ari Holtzman @universeinanegg, and @profjamesevans James Evans! Link: https://t.co/SaRHpoXi0P A thread (1/n)
Students already extensively use AI. This lets everyone have access to the same models and (hopefully) allows new kinds of data protections and in-house uses. AI is not being held at bay by the university not providing it. Not an AI booster, but don't understand this reaction.
UChicago announced today that it had partnered with AI company Anthropic to give students, faculty, and staff access to Claude Enterprise services on a rolling basis starting in July. All University community members will have access by fall quarter. Story to come.
Let's compare which social science topics general science journals (Nature, Science, PNAS...) publish on VS disciplinary journals (AER, APSR, ...)
Econ: general sci overrepresents environment + energy
Poli sci: general sci way overrepresents media + misinfo
I guess I'm no longer assisting and can finally ASSOCIATE!!!
(And get ready for the posts / takes to get spicier! 🌶️🌶️🌶️)
Huge thanks to my *students*, colleagues, advisors!
And frankly huge thanks to @umsi for supporting junior faculty, and having reasonable standards, and good leadership. I hear at other places pre-tenure period can be super stressful and sleepless, but here it's been (almost entirely) fun! <3
Setting up a rival to Arxiv where AI slop is not just acceptable but actively encouraged: no censorship, no one to tell you your claims are obviously fake. a whole ecosystem of people outdoing each other with no quality bar to hold them back. it’s called LinkedIn
📄 Excited to share our latest preprint: the first cross-field audit of LLM-hallucinated citations in science
⚠️ Across arXiv, bioRxiv, SSRN & PMC, we estimate 147K fake citations in 2025 alone — threatening both the quality and equity of scientific work.
Thoughtful coverage from Nature magazine on our recent article in Science about how aging narrows innovation in science, individually (scientist by scientist) and collectively (field by field, nation by nation). Thanks again, Haochuan Cui, Yiling Lin, & @LingfeiWu!
https://t.co/3hnUDhO9yF
Dashun Wang talking 'airplanes for the mind'
🛩️ are heavier than air, but can fly faster than sound—remind you of another technology that "shouldn't" be able to work, but does?
Out today in @ScienceMagazine: with the amazing Haochuan Cui, Yiling Lin, & @LingfeiWu, we analyzed 3.6 million scientists publishing 1960–2020. The findings reshape a century-old debate about age and scientific creativity.
HAI Faculty Affiliate @james_y_zou is exploring how AI can accelerate scientific research and peer review. At the AI+Science conference, he highlighted that AI excels at spotting gaps, but judgment calls still need humans. Read more about his insights: https://t.co/BvIO2vGuk2
Can you boost your AI review scores by asking an LLM to rewrite your paper?
Yes! We call it paper laundering
Our @icmlconf spotlight paper argues current AI reviewers aren't ready to automate peer review, and outlines what a science of peer review automation should look like🧵👇
Hi friends, I’m joining @ChicagoBooth at @UChicago as an Assistant Professor of Applied AI!
I’ll keep working on AI + healthcare. I’m so grateful to my mentors @UMich for helping me find work I love (but after 12 years since undergrad here, it’s definitely time for me to go 😂)
🚨Bipartisan-cited science is rare, unevenly distributed, and disproportionately influential. 🚨
Check out our latest paper in PNAS, led by @zfurnas
🧵1/n
Excited to share our @DSI_UChicago new work accepted by ICLR 2026, with the remarkable Siyang Wu, Sida Li, Ari Holtzman @universeinanegg, and @profjamesevans James Evans! Link: https://t.co/SaRHpoXi0P A thread (1/n)