It’s very alarming, as disclosed in this new video by Mike Arnold, that the “Nigerian government paid a ransom of roughly $4m to a foreign terrorist organization” under questionable circumstances that suggest high-level duplicity. Is this terror now a business enterprise?
This young northerner said things about MAZI NNAMDI KANU that a lot of Igbos will rather not say for fear of being labeled one thing or the other. And he spoke with uncommon eloquence, sincerity & courage.
I put together an interesting list for you. What do you think of it?
- In Islam there are no human rights.
- In Islam there are no civil rights.
- In Islam there is no freedom of speech.
- In Islam there is no democracy.
- In Islam there are no women’s rights.
- In Islam there is no freedom of religion.
- In Islam there is no sanctity of life.
- In Islam a woman has no right to refuse sex with her husband.
- In Islam there is no "Thou shalt not kill."
- In Islam there is no prohibition on rape.
- In Islam there is no prohibition on lying.
- In Islam war never truly ends. It stays active around the clock with different tactics, sometimes a temporary pause to regroup and sometimes full-scale fighting.
- In Islam there is no prohibition on carrying out terrorist acts.
- In Islam there is no prohibition on carrying out massacres.
- In Islam there is no prohibition on executing prisoners of war.
- In Islam there is no prohibition on abusing non-Muslims.
- In Islam there is no equality between men and women.
- In Islam a woman has no right to inherit the same as a man.
- In Islam a woman’s testimony in court is not equal to a man’s.
- In Islam there is no prohibition on polygamy for men.
- In Islam there is no freedom to change your religion. Apostasy is punishable by death.
- In Islam there is no right to criticize the leader.
- In Islam non-Muslims have no equal rights.
- In Islam not all religions and cultures are equal.
- In Islam there is no separation of religion and state.
- In Islam there are no geographical borders. Everything belongs to Allah and the Islamic Ummah.
- In Islam there are no rights for LGBT people. Homosexuality is punishable by death.
- In Islam there are no children’s rights. Child marriage is permitted.
- In Islam there is no prohibition on pedophilia.
- In Islam there is no prohibition on slavery.
- In Islam there is no tolerance for the other or the different.
- In Islam there are no laws made by people. Only Allah’s laws exist.
- In Islam there is no permanent peace with “non-Muslims.” Only a temporary truce.
- In Islam there are no natural human loves or hates. Everything is only for the sake of Allah’s goals.
- In Islam a woman has no right to travel or leave the house without her husband’s or a male guardian’s permission.
- In Islam a woman has no right to marry without a male guardian’s approval.
- In Islam non-Muslims have no right to build new churches, synagogues, or places of worship.
- In Islam there is no right to criticize Islam, the Quran, or the Prophet.
- In Islam atheists and secular people have no right to live in peace without discrimination.
- In Islam women have no right to be judges, political leaders, or heads of state.
- In Islam there is no right to “romantic love” or free relationships outside of marriage.
- In Islam there is no right to oppose jihad or war in the name of Islam.
- In Islam it is impossible to change legislation, because everything comes from Allah and Muhammad.
Isaac Fayose is a well-known sibling of a former Governor. In this video, he says that policemen stood by and even waved while terrorists (they call bandits) are moving in convoy. This is reminiscent of how Afghanistan fell to the Talibans in the last days.
I stand for an independent Christian state in Biafra, where the Christian people can live in security and peace, practice their faith freely, and determine their own future.
After years of violence and marginalization, they deserve nothing less.
The fell consequences of ejecting Mazi Nnamdi Kanu from the courtroom
By ALOY EJIMAKOR
In the theater of criminal jurisprudence, there exists a thin, unyielding line between the preservation of courtroom decorum and the outright annihilation of a defendant’s fundamental right to a fair trial. When a trial involves capital offenses, that line becomes an absolute iron wall.
When Justice Omotosho, on 20th November 2025, ejected Kanu from the courtroom, he may have believed he was stamping his authority on a volatile proceeding. However, by continuing the proceedings in Kanu’s forced absence, especially while the defendant had openly expressed his lack of confidence in the court and while no counsel was present to bridge the gap, the learned trial judge committed an egregious constitutional error.
The bedrock of Nigerian criminal justice is Section 36(6)(c) of the Constitution, which mandates that every person charged with a criminal offense is entitled to defend himself in person or by legal practitioners of his own choice. While statutory provisions like the Administration of Criminal Justice Act provide narrow windows for a trial to proceed when a defendant purposefully absconds, the rules radically shift when a defendant is forcibly excluded by the court itself.
The fatal error here lies in continuing a high-stakes terrorism and capital-offenses trial with an empty dock and an empty defense bench. The Supreme Court of Nigeria held in Adeoye v. State (1999) that: "It is a fundamental principle of our criminal jurisprudence that a trial for a capital offense or serious felony must be conducted in the presence of the accused person."
Keep in mind that Mazi Nnamdi Kanu was not just absent; he was sent out. And to compound the gravity of the ejection, Kanu had no legal counsel present to defend his interests during this forced ejection. Under Nigerian law, a trial judge cannot comfortably lock a defendant out of the room and simultaneously look past the total absence of a defense team to stand in for the defendant.
In Galadima v. State (2012), the apex court emphasized that: "Where an accused person is unrepresented by counsel in a serious criminal trial, especially one touching on capital punishment or severe felony, any proceeding conducted in his absence and without the aid of legal representation is a nullity."
By forging ahead without Kanu and without a counsel for him, the court effectively turned an adversarial criminal trial into an ex-parte proceeding. What makes Justice Omotosho’s insistence on proceeding even more untenable is the explicit lack of confidence in him by Kanu prior to the ejection.
When a defendant forcefully raises a reasonable apprehension of bias, the judge’s primary duty is not to push forward to prove his stoicism; it is to take a pause. The Supreme Court in Deduwa v. Okorodudu (1976), held that: "A judge must be indifferent to the parties and should completely insulate himself from the heat of the battle."
Instead of resorting to an adjournment to allow tempers to cool, the judge over-reacted by expelling the very man crying foul, and then continuing with the proceedings. To the reasonable observer, the optics are damning: a judge clearing the room of a so-called unruly defendant, then quietly wrapping up the case in the dark.
Courtroom misconduct, perceived or real, by a defendant can be frustrating, and judges are human beings prone to exasperation. But the law provides tools to manage such situations, none of which includes conducting a capital trial while the defendant is locked in a holding cell and his defense table is completely bare.
Thus, Justice Omotosho’s decision to continue the proceedings under these precise conditions was perverse and represents a total collapse of due process that will surely shock the conscience of the appellate court.
How Mazi Nnamdi Kanu was frustrated from mounting his defense
By ALOY EJIMAKOR
The trial of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu commenced before Justice Omotosho in March 2025. As in all criminal trials, it is the prosecution that must first present its case before the defense can present its own. This is how it proceeded until June 2025 when the prosecution concluded its case after calling five witnesses.
Following the dismissal of Kanu’s subsequent no-case submission, the court proceeded to establish a strict 6-day window for the defense to present its case. So soon thereafter, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu debriefed his lawyers and indicated a desire to represent himself.
So, when he sought a 90-day timeframe to prepare his defense, including calling 25 witnesses, the court refused it but later reconsidered by giving him a few extra days. In the backdrop of this strict timeframe, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu was effectively frustrated from mounting any meaningful defense.
In the interim, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu had filed a written objection to the jurisdiction of the court to subject him to trial, raising several constitutional and statutory grounds. But instead of ruling on this objection, the court arbitrarily foreclosed him from presenting his defense, simply because he was insisting that his objections to the jurisdiction of the court be resolved first. And there is more.
First, the bedrock of a valid criminal trial in Nigeria is enshrined in Section 36(6)(b) of the Constitution, which mandates that every person charged with a criminal offense is entitled to be given adequate time and facilities for the preparation of his defense. This provision was breached when the prosecution was permitted several months (March to June) to call five witnesses but Mazi Nnamdi Kanu was rigidly restricted to a six-day window to call 25 witnesses (plus the more in the offing). This severe disparity violates the principle of "equality of arms," an essential component of a fair trial.
Second, the shocking failure of Justice Omotosho to safeguard the rights of an unrepresented defendant will forever live in judicial infamy. It is a given that the moment a defendant debriefs his legal team and expresses an intention to defend himself, the trial court owes an elevated and sacred duty of guidance to ensure the lay litigant is not blindsided by technical rules. Thus, forcing an unrepresented defendant, facing capital charges, to compress the testimonies of 25 witnesses into a handful of days is a constructive denial of the right to be heard.
Third, Justice Omotosho’s arbitrary foreclosure of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu from defending himself is an impermissible assault on the primacy of jurisdictional objections. It is settled law across decades of Nigerian jurisprudence that jurisdiction is the lifeblood of adjudication.
So, where a trial court grants the state a wide window to build its case, but traps a self-represented defendant in a chronological straightjacket, refuses to resolve threshold jurisdictional objections and abruptly forecloses the defense, the trial (and any conviction emanating therefrom) becomes a perversive non-event that will ultimately fail appellate muster.
Nigeria is not a democracy. It is a dictatorship under Bola Tinubu, as well as a failed state. How is the way Nigeria is being run now honoring the martyrdom of MKO Abiola? Nigeria is arguably is a significantly worse situation today than even under the Abacha dictatorship.
@marklevinshow, another group for the US to arm are the Biafran freedom fighters. They are on the front lines fighting Islamic terrorism in Nigeria, and are aligned with the US and Israel. We need to support them the same way we did the Angolan freedom fighters in the 1980's.
Fulani terrorists records live invasion of Ahoro Esinle community in Oriire Local Government Area, near Ogbomoso.
Many people killed and 25 Nigerian 🇳🇬 army personnel killed.
BREAKING: “While some people are busy attacking our leader and his supporters instead of doing the same thing that we are doing here. We bring results. This is the answer to the people that believe that Israel is doing nothing.” - Lady Rachel Nwosu.
We returned home very proud and with our spirit very high. I kept saying our tanks giving to Elohim and he sent them to me yesterday one by one, by one. All hail Biafra. Sll hail Israel🇮🇱✡See you soon at the foriegn affairs committee meeting. More good news will come soon🙏🏽
Good hard work that comes from the heart, with loyalty brings good results. Most of the Israeli foriegn affairs committee members at our parliament signed on our document and soon we will have a wonderful deliberation meeting .Biafra is becoming an agenda in Israel❤
The Biafra Naval Force has successfully secured territorial control over the liberated Atabong East and Idabato areas of the Bakassi Peninsula. Our forces now exercise effective control over these waterways and determine what enters our territorial waters.
This represents a commendable achievement by General David Black and his gallant men.
@AloyEjimakor Safe journey the Iroko of Justice himself ,the tyrant govt of the zoo came late ...
You'll triumph over them our able Barr
... May Chukwuokike guard every of your footstep with more wisdom. .. isee!! 🙏