@WSJ@stephenkalin Can you explain why Iranian causalities include injured and women/children differentiations but for the Israelis you only put a single number? Why no mention of 3000 Israelis injured or how many were women/children?
https://t.co/CqVTEoLEmT
#mediabias
@joinflip why have my initial reviews received thousands of views and likes but all my recent ones are at a couple hundred and a few Pennies? Did your algorithm change?
Or is it a ploy that you prop up new users reviews just at the beginning?
No taxpayer bailouts for SVB or tech startups who banked there - period. The question of how to handle SVB depositors & how to prevent a run on other US banks are two *separate* questions. Silicon Valley is trying to conflate the two out of self-interest. Read my full piece in @WSJopinion.
https://t.co/TdRrVIAycE
@Wine_com Why did you stealthy change all spirits to end in .97 thereby excluding them from coupons. Especially, with it being done during the holiday season. This is a very disappointing change.
@JeanneZaino I just heard you on the radio saying that the media doesn’t believe they decide the election. Although now deleted... @nytimes did tweet this
@SenJohnThune I disagree, these companies (airlines) did screw up. Spending an average of 96% of free cash flow on buyback and not having a cash available for a rough patch is irresponsible.
But sure, go with “the Orthodox Jew who has never catcalled a woman in his life is ACKSHUALLY a sexist catcaller for asking for a discussion or debate.” I’m sure your media sycophants will eat it up.
Discussion and debate are not “bad intentions.” Slandering someone as a sexist catcaller without reason or evidence does demonstrate cowardice and bad intent, however.