Ishaan Bhadoo

PhD in Mathematics @ Cambridge. Interested in AI + Maths

[Alvaro Lozano-Robledo @mathandcobb]

If you are in percolation theory, brace yourselves.

[Ishaan Bhadoo @IBhadoo]

@jdlichtman It is an impressive result. However, the ~67% constant and main analytic input already appeared in a paper (assuming the zeros lie very close to the critical line). Claude removed that assumption by combining the existing argument with an already-known matrix viewpoint.

[Ishaan Bhadoo @IBhadoo]

@AcerFur Yes! The ~67% constant and main analytic input already appeared in a paper earlier this year, assuming the zeros lie very close to the critical line. Claude removed that assumption by combining the existing argument with an already-known matrix viewpoint.

[Ishaan Bhadoo @IBhadoo]

@tokenbender Importantly the ~67% constant and main analytic input already appeared in a paper earlier this year. Claude removed that assumption (by a paper from 2000) by combining the existing argument with an already-known matrix viewpoint. The result is impressive but a bit overblown.

[Ishaan Bhadoo @IBhadoo]

@AnthropicAI Important context: the ~67% constant and main analytic input already appeared in a paper earlier this year, assuming the zeros lie very close to the critical line. Claude removed that assumption by combining the existing argument with an already-known matrix viewpoint.

[Ishaan Bhadoo @IBhadoo]

@__alpoge__ @jarredsumner Important context: the ~67% constant and main analytic input already appeared in a paper earlier this year, assuming the zeros lie very close to the critical line. Claude removed that assumption by combining the existing argument with an already-known matrix viewpoint.