In honour of Abu Bakr’s sahaba father and son - Abu Quhafah (ra) and Shaheed Muhammad ibn Abu Bakr (ra) - two great early Muslims who rejected Abu Bakr’s taghut
@sherihastam2005 You’re a Sand Negro, who’s part-Arab, Jew, Afghan, Gypsy & Turk! Your incest-ridden urine-drinking Persian Zoroastrian “culture” is disgusting.
@BenAdamsAgri So, in order to protect your business interests, you’re going to deliberately give us cancer and permanently damage our DNA (and the environment) by spraying huge quantities of toxic lethal chemicals on food we unwittingly eat .. thanks ..
@Iran_fight@vintageZHR You’re a sand negro no different from your cousin Afghans, Arabs, Jews, Gypsies, Kurds & Turks!
Hopefully, a present from your White American & Israeli masters will land on your head ..
@TheHughAnthony You’re a poor working-class https://t.co/lLEYLgT2F4
Your tawdry regional working-class accent grinds on the ears. You’re a pure state-school parasite product. You’re a loser living in a free council house on unemployment benefits that I fund. Deport back to Israel.
@kongkongda5588 Complete Western fabricated nonsense that you’ve mindless regurgitated. There is no evidence or proof for this childish race-based revisionist fabrication. Orientals, Whites, Arabs, Persians and Turks all share the same low-IQ infantile obsession with “race”.
To all those who mailed MPs in April - there’s been a change of education minister @lucympowell is now minister so 🙏 write to your MP again.
Ditto the amazing MPs who helped 1st time @stellacreasy@carolinenokes @nigelhuddlestonmp @markjsewards @gareththomasofficial @IainDale
@Nasir_Amany Ayub Khan: Pashtun
Musa Khan: Hazara
Yahya Khan: Qizilbash
Zia Ul Haq: Punjabi
Jahangir Karamat: Balochi
Pervez Musharraf: Muhajir
Raheel Sharif: Kashmiri
Pakistan is far from perfect but Pashtuns in Pakistan still have far more rights than non-Pashtuns in Afghanistan
@MENAUnleashed@Hanzpal2 May Allah protect & save our Children from the Arabs, Persians & Turks - for these are the barbaric & evil immoral cultureless sub-human races of Gog & Magog. Soulless & untrustworthy races with inward & outward hatred of Muslims & Islam, and worst than the Jews.
Alex Krainer (@NakedHedgie): The British Empire did not die in the 1950s. It went undead. London writes the paper. Washington drops the bomb. Policy Exchange scripted Iran—and Maduro—before October 7.
Alex Krainer:
“I call it the undead British Empire, because you think it doesn’t exist anymore, but there is a zombified form that still exists that still is the most pathogenic parasite on the face of the earth, and they always pretend that they are neutral. They can’t pretend in the case of Ukraine, but they pretend that they’re neutral with regard to the Yemeni conflict, with regard to the Iranian conflict and so forth, but they never are. I wager that wherever human blood is flowing in rivers, you will find British intelligence, the British Council, British NGOs, British charity organizations, very, very deeply involved. And the United States only enters the arena in a very visible way when the time comes to apply brute force. So the Americans will come with the big bombs and start dropping them. But usually by that time the British have been involved for years, if not decades. Syria, Myanmar, Somalia—they’re involved in all of these places, and they always attempt to be neutral. And when you read the strategy documents of places like Policy Exchange, Chatham House and so forth, you see that what’s happening in these different parts of the world is almost precisely the framework that was drawn up and decided in London. Even the Iran war. You’ll find a document called British Policy and the Iran Crisis. It’s like a monster 74-page write-up by Policy Exchange, written before 7 October. So it was written in July of 2023. And basically it sets the script for the whole Middle Eastern crisis that we have since October 7, 2023, including in one place specifying that before we can tackle Iran, we have to take out Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela. I’m not exaggerating. I’m not BSing here. That’s all spelled out in those documents.”
Pascal Lottaz:
“It’s really a very good observation, because the narrative also in our bubble usually is that what happened is that there was a tag-team kind of moment, right—when the British Empire basically overextended, the United States managed to break it and force it to sell off, and basically there was this handover moment that happened in the ’50s and ’60s. One of the examples being, for instance, the first Iran coup d’état, Mossadegh, who was toppled with the MI6, but it was also the first time the CIA was really involved, and the CIA learned the playbook from the MI6, and then they used that and implemented that in Latin America over and over and over again, and worldwide and so on. But it’s basically a handover. But you’re saying, like, no, it’s not a handover. It’s actually still a cooperation of the brute thug on the other side of the Atlantic and the British gentleman on this side that still does this snobbish kind of tea-drinking while Evel Knievel kind of thing.”
This effectively happened - Sunnism’s so-called Umayyad Caliphate was a corrupt racist crypto-Arab Christian imperialist gangster empire based on persecuting & genociding (i) Holy Prophet’s Ahl al-Bayt (a) & (ii) non-Arabs, particularly non-Arab Muslims. Those who know, know this
An alternate timeline where the Ghassanids established a national church known as ‘The Church of Arabia�� based in Bostra. It would have an Arabic liturgy and an Arab Patriarch with authority over all Arab Christians. Zealous & organized, they would certainly try conquering Arabia
This is by far the most disturbing thing I’ve ever seen on X in a long time.Made my blood boil these Jews routinely shoot Palestinian children and prevent ambulances from reaching them to ensure death occurs.Truly Saudis are a cursed nation.
In my graduate seminar on tribes and tribalism, we read Yossef Rapoport’s Becoming Arab, a genuinely thought-provoking book.
Its central arguments is that the supposedly ancient and continuous “Arabness” of Egypt and Greater Syria is, to a large extent, a later historical construction. As local populations (especially Copts and Jews) gradually converted to Islam, much later than the first centuries of Islam and for pragmatic rather than coercive reasons, they also increasingly came to describe and perform themselves as “Arab” through how they dressed, what they read, and, most fascinatingly, how they spoke Arabic.
Putting aside a few mild criticisms I have of the book and its main argument (for instance, there is virtually no discussion of how these communities understood and described themselves before they became “Arab”), I still think it is a must-read for anyone interested in the formation of ethnic, cultural, and social identities.
And there is definitely a huge need for a similarly ambitious study of “becoming Turk,” not taking Turkishness as a timeless or self-evident identity, but asking when, how, and under what historical circumstances people came to understand and describe themselves as “Turk.”
Sunnism’s so-called Umayyad Caliphate was a racist & corrupt crypto-Arab Christian imperialist gangster empire based on persecuting & genociding both the (i) Holy Prophet’s Ahl al-Bayt (a) and (ii) non-Arabs, in particular non-Arab Muslims.
Those who know, know this.
This is the problem with Sunni Islam today, particularly in America/Europe: the goal, especially in America/Europe, is to destroy ethnic solidarity with fellow Arabs, to have them subserve their racial interests to that of the ‘Ummah’. It’s why Arabs in America are complacent and don’t engage in the kind of racial unity you see other groups do: such as Jews.
They go to mosques that are racially mixed and they sermons from Pakistani, Indonesian, and (God forbid) Gulf Arab Imams that talk about ‘the ummah’, they talk about how they have to ‘unite as Muslims’, but they don’t at all address their ethnic concerns and needs, and this is intentional. It’s meant to prevent Arabs of the Levant, regardless of their religion, from uniting as a coherent group to fight Jewish power and influence politics in the Levant.
It’s how they were able to convince them that Bashar Al-Assad was an evil dictator that was a threat to Islam. It’s how they’re able to convince Arabs that Iran, Hizb’Allah, and Ansar Allah are not allies or friends, but ‘kufar’ that are ‘two sides of the same coin’. It’s how they get them to accept the current Syrian regimes’ persecution of Alawites, and to look the other way when they persecute Christians, Druze, Shiite, etc.
It’s how they’re able to get Arabs of the Levant to understand that the arbitrary boundaries created by the Sykes-Picot agreement that lead to the modern states of the Levant are indeed arbitrary and were created to serve British/French (and ultimately Jewish) interests, but then at the same time they’re hesitant to engage into the political struggle to liberate themselves from these colonial shackles because that would mean engaging in politics with Shiites, Druze, Alawites, and Christians.
It’s how they’re able to convince Arabs (and you see this with guys like Daniel Haqiqatjou) that rebelling against the Ottoman Empire was evil and wrong, because ‘ya haram see how we betrayed the caliphate’. The biggest frustration I have with Arabs, especially Palestinians, is that they have little to no understanding of their history prior to 1948: they couldn’t tell you about the heroes who tried to liberate us from the Turkish yoke: Daher Al-Umar, Qasim al-Ahmad, and Faisal I bin Ali Al-Hashimi.
In fact it’s how they’re able to convince Arabs that actually the Turks are our friends and the Ottoman Empire was a glorious empire of Islam when in fact they were our oppressors, especially come the 18th century, and the modern Turkish state seeks to dominate Syria politically and economically.
Unless Levant arabs unite as a racial group, we will always be subjugated. We will end up being nothing more but janissaries for the Turks, and pay pigs to the Saudi state.